An adaptive genetic fuzzy multi-path routing protocol for wireless ad-hoc networks

被引:0
|
作者
Liu, H [1 ]
Li, J [1 ]
Zhang, YQ [1 ]
Pan, Y [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgia State Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Atlanta, GA 30302 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The inherent uncertainty in wireless mobile ad hoc networks (MANET), due to nodal mobility, unstable links, and limited resources, frequently renders routing paths unusable. Thus, recurrent route discoveries detrimentally affect network performance. The most promising solution is to use multiple redun(1)dant paths for routing. However, selecting an optimal path set is a NP hard problem. Most current multi-path routing protocols do not concentrate on the uncertainty in MANET. They choose an "optimal" multi-path set by considering only one single route selection parameter, such as the least number of intermediate hops or the maximal remaining battery power. As a result, they miss the correlations among the multiple route selection parameters. This paper proposes the Genetic Fuzzy Multi-path Routing Protocol (GFMRP), which is a multi-path routing protocol based on fuzzy set theory and evolutionary computing. GFMRP naturally deals with the uncertainty in MANET and adaptively constructs a set of highly reliable paths by considering the interplays among multiple route selection parameters. GFMRP takes into account four important factors as the selection parameters; which are the energy consumption rate, queue occupancy rate, link stability, and the number of intermediate nodes. The performance of GFMRP is evaluated in terms of packet delivery ratio, average end-to-end delay, and the frequency of route rediscovery in ns2 context. Simulation results demonstrate that GFMRP is well suited to the ad hoc environment and outperforms DSR, SMR and SBMR.
引用
收藏
页码:468 / 475
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] An AIAD-Based Adaptive Routing Protocol in Ad-Hoc Wireless Networks
    Hong, Youn-Sik
    Lee, Ki-Young
    [J]. NETWORK AND PARALLEL COMPUTING, 2008, 5245 : 1 - +
  • [32] Adaptive geographical routing in wireless ad-hoc networks
    Huang, H
    [J]. VTC2004-FALL: 2004 IEEE 60TH VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-7: WIRELESS TECHNOLOGIES FOR GLOBAL SECURITY, 2004, : 2749 - 2753
  • [33] New Multi-path Routing Protocol in Ad Hoc Network
    Zhang, Chaoyi
    Zhao, Yandong
    [J]. APPLIED MATHEMATICS & INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2013, 7 (06): : 2499 - 2507
  • [34] Improved rank-based multi-path routing in mobile ad-hoc networks
    Jian, MS
    Lin, CT
    [J]. 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY, VOLS 1 AND 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, : 1249 - 1254
  • [35] Adaptive Routing Protocol in Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks Using Genetic Algorithm
    Shah, Nishit
    El-Ocla, Hosam
    Shah, Pearly
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2022, 10 : 132949 - 132964
  • [36] UMDR: Multi-Path Routing Protocol for Underwater Ad Hoc Networks with Directional Antenna
    Yang, Jianmin
    Liu, Songzuo
    Liu, Qipei
    Qiao, Gang
    [J]. 2017 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATION, IMAGE AND SIGNAL PROCESSING (CCISP 2017), 2018, 960
  • [37] An Improved Node-Disjoint Multi-path Routing protocol in ad hoc networks
    Qin, Zhen
    Li, Lemin
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE INFORMATION COMPUTING AND AUTOMATION, VOLS 1-3, 2008, : 874 - 877
  • [38] Power and Delay-aware Multi-path Routing Protocol for Ad Hoc Networks
    Othmen, Salwa
    Belghith, Aymen
    Zarai, Faouzi
    Obaidat, Mohammad S.
    Kamoun, Lotfi
    [J]. 2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER, INFORMATION AND TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS (CITS), 2014,
  • [39] Multi-path routing protocols in wireless mobile ad hoc networks: A quantitative comparison
    Parissidis, Georgios
    Lenders, Vincent
    May, Martin
    Plattner, Bernhard
    [J]. NEXT GENERATION TELETRAFFIC AND WIRED/ WIRELESS ADVANCED NETWORKING, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 4003 : 313 - 326
  • [40] A Secure Prioritized Trust Based Multi-path Routing Protocol for Ad Hoc Networks
    Garg, Poonam K.
    Misra, M.
    [J]. RECENT TRENDS IN NETWORKS AND COMMUNICATIONS, 2010, 90 : 411 - 420