Progress in shock wave/boundary layer interactions

被引:332
|
作者
Gaitonde, Datta V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
Shock boundary layer interactions; Separated flows; Viscous-inviscid interactions; TURBULENT-BOUNDARY-LAYER; LARGE-EDDY SIMULATION; DIRECT NUMERICAL-SIMULATION; LOW-FREQUENCY UNSTEADINESS; COMPRESSION-RAMP; INDUCED SEPARATION; GROUND TEST; WAVE; FLOW; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.paerosci.2014.09.002
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Recent advances in shock wave boundary layer interaction research are reviewed in four areas: (i) understanding low frequency unsteadiness, (ii) heat transfer prediction capability, (iii) phenomena in complex (multi-shock boundary layer) interactions and (iv) flow control techniques. Substantial success has been achieved in describing the phenomenology of low frequency unsteadiness, including correlations and coherent structures in the separation bubble, through complementary experimental and numerical studies on nominally 2-D interactions. These observations have been parlayed to propose underlying mechanisms based on oscillation, amplification and upstream boundary layer effects. For heat transfer prediction capability, systematic studies conducted under the auspices of AFOSR and RTO-AVT activities have shown that for axisymmetric laminar situations, heat transfer rates can be measured, and in many cases predicted, reasonably accurately even in the presence of high-temperature effects. Efforts have quantified uncertainty of Reynolds averaged turbulence models, and hybrid methods have been developed to at least partially address deficiencies. Progress in complex interactions encompass two of the major phenomena affected by SBLI in scramjet flowpaths: unstart and mode transition from ramjet (dual mode) to scramjet. Control studies have attempted to leverage the better understanding of the fundamental phenomena with passive and active techniques, the latter exploiting the superior properties of newer actuators. Objectives include reduction in size of the separation region, surface loads and modulation of spectral content. Finally, SBLI studies have benefited handsomely from successful ground and flight test campaigns associated with the HIFiRE-1 and HIFiRE-2 campaigns, results from which are woven into the discussion, as are limitations in current capability and understanding. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:80 / 99
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Advances in CFD prediction of shock wave turbulent boundary layer interactions
    Knight, D
    Yan, H
    Panaras, AG
    Zheltovodov, A
    [J]. PROGRESS IN AEROSPACE SCIENCES, 2003, 39 (2-3) : 121 - 184
  • [32] Effect of dimples on glancing shock wave turbulent boundary layer interactions
    Kontis, K.
    Lada, C.
    Zare-Behtash, H.
    [J]. SHOCK WAVES, 2008, 17 (05) : 323 - 335
  • [33] A Review on Asymmetry Characteristics of Confined Shock Wave/Boundary Layer Interactions
    Bo Sun
    Zhuo Chang-Fei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2020, 23 (02): : 261 - 270
  • [34] CONTROL OF SHOCK-WAVE BOUNDARY-LAYER INTERACTIONS BY BLEED
    CHYU, WJ
    RIMLINGER, MJ
    SHIH, TIP
    [J]. AIAA JOURNAL, 1995, 33 (07) : 1239 - 1247
  • [35] Micro-vortex generators for shock wave/boundary layer interactions
    Panaras, Argyris G.
    Lu, Frank K.
    [J]. PROGRESS IN AEROSPACE SCIENCES, 2015, 74 : 16 - 47
  • [36] Scaling for steady and traveling shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interactions
    Toure, P. S. R.
    Schuelein, E.
    [J]. EXPERIMENTS IN FLUIDS, 2020, 61 (07)
  • [37] Instabilities in oblique shock wave/laminar boundary-layer interactions
    Guiho, F.
    Alizard, F.
    Robinet, J. -Ch.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2016, 789 : 1 - 35
  • [38] Analytical reconstruction of axisymmetric curved shock wave/boundary layer interactions
    Cheng, Jianrui
    Zhang, Tao
    Shi, Chongguang
    Da, Xingya
    Zhu, Chengxiang
    You, Yancheng
    [J]. PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 2024, 36 (04)
  • [39] Surface pressure measurements in shock wave boundary-layer interactions
    Lee, Y
    Garg, S
    Settles, GS
    [J]. KSME INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 1997, 11 (02): : 164 - 172
  • [40] Research progress of shock wave/boundary layer interaction controls induced by bump
    Tian S.
    Jin L.
    Du Z.
    Zhong X.
    Huang W.
    Liu Y.
    [J]. Hangkong Xuebao/Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44 (18):