The Network Structure of Nanotechnology Research Output of Turkey: A Co-authorship and Co-word Analysis Study

被引:0
|
作者
Darvish, Hamid [1 ]
Tonta, Yasar [2 ]
机构
[1] Kastamonu Univ, Fac Arts & Sci, Dept Informat Management, Kastamonu, Turkey
[2] Hacettepe Univ, Dept Informat Management, TR-06800 Ankara, Turkey
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This paper aims to assess the diffusion of nanotechnology knowledge within the Turkish scientific community using co-citation and co-word analysis techniques. We retrieved a total of 10,062 records of nanotechnology papers authored by Turkish researchers between 2000 and 2011 from Web of Science (WoS) and divided the data set into two 6-year periods. We identified the most prolific and collaborative top 15 universities in each period based on their network properties. We then created co-authorship networks of Turkish nanotechnology researchers in each period and identified the most prolific and collaborative top 15 authors on the basis of network centrality coefficients. Finally, we used co-word analysis to identify the major nanotechnology research fields in Turkey on the basis of the co-occurrence of words in the titles of papers. Findings show that nanotechnology research in Turkey continues to increase due to researchers collaborating with their colleagues. Turkish researchers tend to collaborate within their own groups or universities and the overall connectedness of the network is thus low. Their publication and collaboration patterns conform to Lotka's law. They work mainly on nanotechnology applications in Materials Sciences, Chemistry and Physics, among others. This is commensurate, more or less, with the global trends in nanotechnology research and development.
引用
收藏
页码:732 / 743
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Co-authorship network analysis in health research: method and potential use
    Fonseca e Fonseca, Bruna de Paula
    Sampaio, Ricardo Barros
    de Araujo Fonseca, Marcus Vinicius
    Zicker, Fabio
    HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2016, 14
  • [22] The Effect of Co-authorship Network on Research Performance of Scholars: A Correlation Analysis
    Wang Chuan-yi
    Chengzhe
    Chen, Chen
    IIP'17: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT INFORMATION PROCESSING, 2017,
  • [23] High performance computing research activity: Co-authorship network analysis
    Ahn, Sul-Ah
    Jung, Youngim
    ICIC Express Letters, Part B: Applications, 2015, 6 (05): : 1437 - 1441
  • [24] Co-authorship network analysis in health research: method and potential use
    Bruna de Paula Fonseca e Fonseca
    Ricardo Barros Sampaio
    Marcus Vinicius de Araújo Fonseca
    Fabio Zicker
    Health Research Policy and Systems, 14
  • [25] Research groups of oncology co-authorship network in China
    Yu, Qi
    Shao, Hongfang
    Duan, Zhiguang
    SCIENTOMETRICS, 2011, 89 (02) : 553 - 567
  • [26] Scientific collaboration in co-authorship research: a method based on network analysis
    Sampaio, Ricardo Barros
    de Souza Sacerdote, Helena Celia
    Fonseca Fonseca, Bruna de Paula
    Cabral Fernandes, Jorge Henrique
    PERSPECTIVAS EM CIENCIA DA INFORMACAO, 2015, 20 (04): : 79 - 92
  • [27] Research groups of oncology co-authorship network in China
    Qi Yu
    Hongfang Shao
    Zhiguang Duan
    Scientometrics, 2011, 89 : 553 - 567
  • [28] FROM TRANSLATION TO NETWORK - THE CO-WORD ANALYSIS
    CALLON, M
    COURTIAL, JP
    TURNER, WA
    BAUIN, S
    SCIENTOMETRICS, 1983, 5 (01) : 78 - 78
  • [29] Study of co-authorship network of papers in the Journal of Research in Medical Sciences using social network analysis
    Zare-Farashbandi, Firoozeh
    Geraei, Ehsan
    Siamaki, Saba
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2014, 19 (01): : 41 - 46
  • [30] Research on the Semantic Measurement in Co-word Analysis
    Zhou, Liqin
    Ba, Zhichao
    Fan, Hao
    Zhang, Bin
    TRANSFORMING DIGITAL WORLDS, ICONFERENCE 2018, 2018, 10766 : 409 - 419