Availability of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Among US and Pakistani Doctors in COVID-19 Pandemic

被引:49
|
作者
Ahmed, Jawad [1 ]
Malik, Farheen [1 ]
Bin Arif, Taha [1 ]
Majid, Zainab [1 ]
Chaudhary, Muhammad A. [2 ,3 ]
Ahmad, Junaid [4 ]
Malik, Mehreen [5 ]
Khan, Taj M. [6 ]
Khalid, Muhammad [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Dow Univ Hlth Sci, Internal Med, Karachi, Pakistan
[2] WellSpan Good Samaritan Hosp, Family Med, Lebanon, NH USA
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Ctr Surg & Publ Hlth, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Liaquat Univ Med & Hlth Sci, Internal Med, Jamshoro, Pakistan
[5] Aga Khan Univ, Anesthesiol, Karachi, Pakistan
[6] Texas Childrens Hosp, Baylor Coll Med, Pediat, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[7] Kansas City Univ Med & Biosci, Cardiol, Joplin, MO USA
[8] Ascens Via Christi Hosp, Cardiol, Pittsburg, KS USA
关键词
covid-19; personal protective equipment; ppe; healthcare workers; stop transmission; doctors; physicians; infection; sars-cov-2; pandemic; WORKERS;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.8550
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has put an excessive strain on healthcare systems across the globe, causing a shortage of personal protective equipment (PPE). PPE is a precious commodity for health personnel to protect them against infections. We investigated the availability of PPE among doctors in the United States (US) and Pakistan. Methods A cross-sectional study, including doctors from the US and Pakistan, was carried out from April 8 to May 5, 2020. An online self-administered questionnaire was distributed to doctors working in hospitals in the US and Pakistan after a small pilot study. All analysis was done using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 23.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Results After informed consent, 574 doctors (60.6% from Pakistan and 39.4% from the US) were included in the analysis. The majority of the participants were females (53.3%), and the mean age of the participants was 35.3 +/- 10.3 years. Most doctors (47.7%) were from medicine and allied fields. Among the participants, 87.6% of doctors from the US reported having access to masks/N95 respirators, 79.6% to gloves, 77.9% to face-shields or goggles, and 50.4% to fullsuit/gown. Whereas, doctors in Pakistan reported to have poor availability of PPE with only 37.4% having access to masks/N95 respirator, 34.5% to gloves, 13.8% to face-shields or goggles, and 12.9% to full-suit/gown. The reuse of PPE was reported by 80.5% and 60.3% physicians from the US and Pakistan, respectively. More doctors from Pakistan (50.6%) reported that they had been forced to work without PPE compared to doctors in the US (7.1%). Conclusion There is a lack of different forms of PPE in the US and Pakistan. Doctors from both countries reported that they had been forced to work without PPE. Compared to the US, more doctors from Pakistan reported having faced discrimination in receiving PPE.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Personal protective equipment (PPE) pollution driven by the COVID-19 pandemic in coastal environment, Southeast Coast of India
    Gunasekaran, Kannan
    Mghili, Bilal
    Saravanakumar, Ayyappan
    MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2022, 180
  • [22] Personal protective equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic: a reply
    Cook, T. M.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2020, 75 (08) : 1121 - 1122
  • [23] Pharmacological Prophylaxis and Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Practices in Gynecological Cancer Surgery During COVID-19 Pandemic
    Pooja Singh
    Geetu Bhandoria
    Amita Maheshwari
    Indian Journal of Gynecologic Oncology, 2021, 19
  • [24] Sourcing Personal Protective Equipment During the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Livingston, Edward
    Desai, Angel
    Berkwits, Michael
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2020, 323 (19): : 1912 - 1914
  • [25] Personal protective equipment (PPE) pollution driven by the COVID-19 pandemic in coastal environment, Southeast Coast of India
    Gunasekaran, Kannan
    Mghili, Bilal
    Saravanakumar, Ayyappan
    MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2022, 180
  • [26] Pharmacological Prophylaxis and Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Practices in Gynecological Cancer Surgery During COVID-19 Pandemic
    Singh, Pooja
    Bhandoria, Geetu
    Maheshwari, Amita
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2021, 19 (01)
  • [27] The use of personal protective equipment in the COVID-19 pandemic era
    Smereka, Jacek
    Szarpark, Lukasz
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2020, 38 (07): : 1529 - 1530
  • [28] Personal protective equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic: a comment
    Murphy, J. H.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2020, 75 (08) : 1121 - 1121
  • [29] Isolation Requirements and Personal Protective Equipment in the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Rabold, Erica
    Rovnan, Helene
    DuMont, Tiffany
    CRITICAL CARE NURSING QUARTERLY, 2020, 43 (04) : 407 - 412
  • [30] Donning and doffing of personal protective equipment (PPE) for angiography during the COVID-19 crisis
    John, Thadathilankal-Jess
    Hassan, Karim
    Weich, Hellmuth
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2020, 41 (19) : 1786 - 1787