Hypersensitivity to DNA damage in antephase as a safeguard for genome stability

被引:19
|
作者
Feringa, Femke M. [1 ,2 ]
Krenning, Lenno [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Koch, Andre [1 ,2 ]
van den Berg, Jeroen [1 ,2 ]
van den Broek, Bram [1 ,2 ]
Jalink, Kees [1 ,2 ]
Medema, Rene H. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Netherlands Canc Inst, Div Cell Biol 1, Plesmanlaan 121, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Netherlands Canc Inst, Canc Genom Ctr, Plesmanlaan 121, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Royal Netherlands Acad Arts & Sci KNAW, Hubrecht Inst, NL-3584 CT Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, NL-3584 CT Utrecht, Netherlands
来源
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 2016年 / 7卷
关键词
ANAPHASE-PROMOTING COMPLEX/CYCLOSOME; EARLY MITOTIC INHIBITOR-1; CELL-CYCLE; SEGREGATION ERRORS; MITOSIS; ACTIVATION; EMI1; G2; DESTRUCTION; CHECKPOINT;
D O I
10.1038/ncomms12618
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Activation of the DNA-damage response can lead to the induction of an arrest at various stages in the cell cycle. These arrests are reversible in nature, unless the damage is too excessive. Here we find that checkpoint reversibility is lost in cells that are in very late G2, but not yet fully committed to enter mitosis (antephase). We show that antephase cells exit the cell cycle and enter senescence at levels of DNA damage that induce a reversible arrest in early G2. We show that checkpoint reversibility critically depends on the presence of the APC/C inhibitor Emi1, which is degraded just before mitosis. Importantly, ablation of the cell cycle withdrawal mechanism in antephase promotes cell division in the presence of broken chromosomes. Thus, our data uncover a novel, but irreversible, DNA-damage response in antephase that is required to prevent the propagation of DNA damage during cell division.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] DNA topoisomerases and genome stability
    Wang, JC
    [J]. FASEB JOURNAL, 1997, 11 (09): : A1300 - A1300
  • [22] Applications of RNA interference for studies in DNA damage processing, genome stability, mutagenesis, and cancer
    Bedford, JS
    Liber, HL
    [J]. SEMINARS IN CANCER BIOLOGY, 2003, 13 (04) : 301 - 308
  • [23] PC4 promotes genome stability and DNA repair through binding of ssDNA at DNA damage sites
    Mortusewicz, O.
    Evers, B.
    Helleday, T.
    [J]. ONCOGENE, 2016, 35 (06) : 761 - 770
  • [24] PC4 promotes genome stability and DNA repair through binding of ssDNA at DNA damage sites
    O Mortusewicz
    B Evers
    T Helleday
    [J]. Oncogene, 2016, 35 : 761 - 770
  • [25] Interplay between DNA replication stress, chromatin dynamics and DNA-damage response for the maintenance of genome stability
    Mognato, Maddalena
    Burdak-Rothkamm, Susanne
    Rothkamm, Kai
    [J]. MUTATION RESEARCH-REVIEWS IN MUTATION RESEARCH, 2021, 787
  • [26] Guardians of the genome: DNA damage and repair
    Wu, Qian
    [J]. GUARDIANS OF THE GENOME: DNA DAMAGE AND REPAIR, 2020, 64 (05): : 683 - 685
  • [27] Hypersensitivity to DNA damage in plant stem cell niches
    Fulcher, Nick
    Sablowski, Robert
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2009, 106 (49) : 20984 - 20988
  • [28] Coupling DNA Damage and Repair: an Essential Safeguard during Programmed DNA Double-Strand Breaks?
    Betermier, Mireille
    Borde, Valerie
    de Villartay, Jean-Pierre
    [J]. TRENDS IN CELL BIOLOGY, 2020, 30 (02) : 87 - 96
  • [29] The DNA damage response acts as a safeguard against harmful DNA-RNA hybrids of different origins
    Barroso, Sonia
    Herrera-Moyano, Emilia
    Munoz, Sergio
    Garcia-Rubio, Maria
    Gomez-Gonzalez, Belen
    Aguilera, Andres
    [J]. EMBO REPORTS, 2019, 20 (09)
  • [30] DYRK2 maintains genome stability via neddylation of cullins in response to DNA damage
    Kawamura, Akira
    Yoshida, Saishu
    Aoki, Katsuhiko
    Shimoyama, Yuya
    Yamada, Kohji
    Yoshida, Kiyotsugu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE, 2022, 135 (11)