Combined brachytherapy and ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy for intermediate-risk prostate cancer: Comparison of toxicity outcomes using a high-dose-rate (HDR) versus low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy boost

被引:5
|
作者
Kollmeier, Marisa A. [1 ,4 ]
Gorovets, Daniel [1 ]
Flynn, Jessica [2 ]
McBride, Sean [1 ]
Brennan, Victoria [1 ]
Beaudry, Joel [3 ]
Cohen, Gilad [3 ]
Damato, Antonio [3 ]
Zhang, Zhigang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zelefsky, Michael J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, New York, NY USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, New York, NY USA
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Med Phys, New York, NY USA
[4] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065 USA
关键词
LDR brachytherapy; HDR brachytherapy; Gu toxicity; Ultra-hypofractionated external beam radiotherapy; Stereotactic radiotherapy; EXTERNAL-BEAM RADIATION; ASCENDE-RT; THERAPY; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.brachy.2022.04.006
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: To compare toxicity profiles of low-dose rate (LDR) and high-dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy boost combined with ultra-hypofractionated external beam radiation therapy (UH-EBRT). MATERIALS/METHODS: 99 patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer underwent an HDR ( n = 59) or LDR ( n = 40) boost combined with UH-EBRT (5 Gy x 5) . HDR (Ir-192) was delivered a single dose (15 Gy) and LDR (Pd-103) prescription dose was 100 Gy. Median baseline IPSS was 5 for both cohorts. Median follow-up was 29.3mos. Cumulative incidences were calculated for toxicity. Fisher exact tests were used to evaluate associations. RESULTS: Overall incidence of grade 2 genitourinary toxicity for the entire cohort at 12 and 24 months was 21% and 29%, respectively. The incidence of grade 2 genitourinary toxicity at 12 and 24 months was higher for LDR cohort compared with HDR cohort (45% vs 5.1% and 55% vs 11%; p < 0.001). On MVA, only treatment regimen (LDR versus HDR) was associated with grade 2+ genitourinary toxicity ( p < 0.001). Two patients experienced grade 2 rectal toxicity in each cohort. No grade > 3 toxicities were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Both LDR and HDR brachytherapy combined with UH-EBRT had favorable toxicity profiles, but significantly less grade 2 + genitourinary toxicity was observed in patients receiving HDR. (C) 2022 American Brachytherapy Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:599 / 604
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Toxicity and early treatment outcomes in low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer managed by high-dose-rate brachytherapy as a monotherapy
    Ghadjar, Pirus
    Keller, Tamara
    Rentsch, Cyrill A.
    Isaak, Bernhard
    Behrensmeier, Frank
    Stroux, Andrea
    Thalmann, George N.
    Aebersold, Daniel M.
    [J]. BRACHYTHERAPY, 2009, 8 (01) : 45 - 51
  • [22] A PROSPECTIVE COST COMPARISON BETWEEN HIGH-DOSE-RATE AND LOW-DOSE-RATE PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY
    Verbeek, Albert
    Martell, Kevin
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 174 : S54 - S55
  • [23] Low-dose-rate or high-dose-rate brachytherapy in treatment of prostate cancer - between options
    Skowronek, Janusz
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2013, 5 (01) : 33 - 41
  • [24] Treatment patterns of high-dose-rate and low-dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for prostate cancer
    Barnes, Justin
    Kennedy, William R.
    Fischer-Valuck, Benjamin W.
    Baumann, Brian C.
    Michalski, Jeff M.
    Gay, Hiram A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2019, 11 (04) : 320 - 328
  • [25] A dosimetric comparison of high dose rate (HDR) and low dose-rate (LDR) prostate brachytherapy.
    Al-Hebshi, A
    Morton, G
    Sankreacha, R
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2004, 72 : S36 - S36
  • [26] Current controversies in high-dose-rate versus low-dose-rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer
    Stewart, Alexandra J.
    Viswanathan, Akila N.
    [J]. CANCER, 2006, 107 (05) : 908 - 915
  • [27] Response to 'Unexpected lower biochemical control of high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost than low-dose-rate brachytherapy boost for clinically localized prostate cancer'
    Slevin, Finbar
    Rodda, Sree Lakshmi
    Bownes, Peter
    Murray, Louise
    Bottomley, David
    Melody, Clare
    Adiotomre, Ese
    Al-Qaisieh, Bashar
    Dugdale, Emma
    Hulson, Oliver
    Mason, Joshua
    Smith, Jonathan
    Henry, Ann M.
    [J]. CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 24 : 52 - 52
  • [28] OUR EXPERIENCE IN LOW-DOSE-RATE BRACHYTHERAPY PREVIOUSLY TO START THE HIGH-DOSE-RATE BRACHYTHERAPY BOOST TECHNIQUE BREAST CANCER
    Castro, J. E.
    Gonzalez Patino, E.
    Salvador Garrido, N.
    Luna Vega, V.
    Varela Pazos, A.
    Anido Herranz, U.
    Lobato Busto, R.
    Porto Vazquez, C.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2008, 88 : S201 - S201
  • [29] Toxicity and quality of life after high-dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer
    Aluwini, Shafak
    Busser, Wendy M. H.
    Alemayehu, Wendimagegn Ghidey
    Boormans, Joost L.
    Kirkels, Wim J.
    Jansen, Peter P.
    Praag, John O.
    Bangma, Chris H.
    Kolkman-Deurloo, Inger-Karine K.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2015, 117 (02) : 252 - 257
  • [30] Comparing the Cost-Effectiveness of Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy, High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy, and Hypofactionated Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Low-/Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer
    Lanni, T.
    Krauss, D.
    Marvin, K. S.
    Gustafson, G.
    Ye, H.
    Chen, P.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2014, 90 : S587 - S588