Synthesizing Core Outcome Sets for outcomes research in cohort studies: a systematic review

被引:5
|
作者
Musgrove, Erica [1 ,2 ]
Gasparini, Loretta [1 ,2 ]
McBain, Katie [1 ,2 ]
Clifford, Susan A. [1 ,2 ]
Carter, Simon A. [1 ,3 ]
Teede, Helena [4 ,5 ]
Wake, Melissa [1 ,2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Murdoch Childrens Res Inst, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Dept Paediat, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Sydney Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Monash Univ, Sch Publ Hlth & Preventat Med, Monash Ctr Hlth Res & Implementat, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[5] Monash Hlth, Monash Endocrinol & Diabet Units, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[6] Univ Auckland, Liggins Inst, Auckland, New Zealand
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词
CLINICAL-TRIALS; VASCULAR MALFORMATIONS; HEALTH; DIAGNOSIS; EPILEPSY; ORIGINS; DISEASE; BIRTH; CARE;
D O I
10.1038/s41390-021-01801-2
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Background Life course studies are designed to "collect once, use multiple times" for observational and, increasingly, interventional research. Core Outcome Sets (COS) are minimum sets developed for clinical trials by multi-stakeholder consensus methodologies. We aimed to synthesize published COS that might guide outcomes selection for early life cohorts with an interventional focus. Methods We searched PubMed, Medline, COMET, and CROWN for COS published before January 2021 relevant to four life stages (pregnancy, newborns, children <8 years, and parents (adults aged 18-50 years)). We synthesized core outcomes into overarching constructs. Results From 46 COS we synthesized 414 core outcomes into 118 constructs. "Quality of life", "adverse events", "medication use", "hospitalization", and "mortality" were consistent across all stages. For pregnancy, common constructs included "preterm birth", "delivery mode", "pre-eclampsia", "gestational weight gain", "gestational diabetes", and "hemorrhage"; for newborns, "birthweight", "small for gestational age", "neurological damage", and "morbidity" and "infection/sepsis"; for pediatrics, "pain", "gastrointestinal morbidity", "growth/weight", "breastfeeding", "feeding problems", "hearing", "neurodevelopmental morbidity", and "social development"; and for adults, "disease burden", "mental health", "neurological function/stroke", and "cardiovascular health/morbidity". Conclusion This COS synthesis generated outcome constructs that are of high value to stakeholders (participants, health providers, services), relevant to life course research, and could position cohorts for trial capabilities. Impact We synthesized existing Core Outcome Sets as a transparent methodology that could prioritize outcomes for lifecourse cohorts with an interventional focus. "Quality of life", "adverse events", "medication use", "hospitalization", and "mortality" are important outcomes across pregnancy, newborns, childhood, and early-to-mid-adulthood (the age range relevant to parents). Other common outcomes (such as "birthweight", "cognitive function/ability", "psychological health") are also highly relevant to lifecourse research. This synthesis could assist new early life cohorts to pre-select outcomes that are of high value to stakeholders (participants, health providers, services), are relevant to lifecourse research, and could position them for future trials and interventional capability.
引用
收藏
页码:936 / 945
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] CORE OUTCOME SETS AND DENTAL PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES
    Lamont, Thomas J.
    Clarkson, Jan E.
    JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED DENTAL PRACTICE, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [42] A review of core outcome sets (COS) developed for different settings finds there is a subset of outcomes relevant for both research and routine care
    Kearney, Anna
    Williamson, Paula R.
    Dodd, Susanna
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2024, 173
  • [43] A review of patient and carer participation and the use of qualitative research in the development of core outcome sets
    Jones, Janet E.
    Jones, Laura L.
    Keeley, Thomas J. H.
    Calvert, Melanie J.
    Mathers, Jonathan
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (03):
  • [44] Abortion research that matters: Using core outcomes to enable systematic review
    Mark, Alice
    Henderson, Jillian
    Rodriguez, Maria
    Edelman, Alison
    CONTRACEPTION, 2022, 116 : 1 - 3
  • [45] Core outcome sets in cancer and their approaches to identifying and selecting patient-reported outcome measures: a systematic review
    Ramsey, Imogen
    Eckert, Marion
    Hutchinson, Amanda D.
    Marker, Julie
    Corsini, Nadia
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES, 2020, 4 (01)
  • [46] Core outcome sets in cancer and their approaches to identifying and selecting patient-reported outcome measures: a systematic review
    Imogen Ramsey
    Marion Eckert
    Amanda D. Hutchinson
    Julie Marker
    Nadia Corsini
    Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 4
  • [47] Harmonisation of research outcomes for meaningful translation to practice: The role of Core Outcome Sets and the CROWN Initiative
    Daly, J. Oliver
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2018, 58 (01): : 15 - 16
  • [48] Variation in the outcome reported by studies of interventions for atypical endometrial hyperplasia: a systematic review (the first step in the development of CRUK-funded Core Outcome Sets)
    Tan, A.
    Rivas, C.
    Yorke, S.
    Khan, K.
    Rogozinska, E.
    Brockbank, E.
    Manchanda, R.
    Cooper, N.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2019, 126 : 85 - 85
  • [49] Core outcome sets will improve the quality of obstetrics research
    Williamson, P.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2014, 121 (10) : 1196 - 1196
  • [50] Progress on core outcome sets for critical care research
    Blackwood, Bronagh
    Marshall, John
    Rose, Louise
    CURRENT OPINION IN CRITICAL CARE, 2015, 21 (05) : 439 - 444