APPLICATIONS OF FUZZY MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHODS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING: A STATE-OF-THE-ART SURVEY

被引:20
|
作者
Wen, Zhi [1 ]
Liao, Huchang [1 ]
Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras [2 ]
Antuchevicienc, Jurgita [3 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Business Sch, Chengdu 610064, Peoples R China
[2] Vilnius Gediminas Tech Univ, Inst Sustainable Construct, Vilnius, Lithuania
[3] Vilnius Gediminas Tech Univ, Dept Construct Management & Real Estate, Vilnius, Lithuania
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
civil engineering; multiple criteria decision making; fuzzy set; fuzzy multiple criteria decision making; literature review; LINGUISTIC TERM SETS; CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS; RISK-ASSESSMENT; MODEL; SELECTION; MULTICRITERIA; AHP; ENVIRONMENT; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.3846/jcem.2021.15252
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
A variety of fuzzy multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) models have been proposed to solve complicated decision-making problems. Many applications have been achieved, especially in the field of civil engineering. To analyze the developments about the fuzzy MCDM methods and their applications in civil engineering in recent years and further explore the future research directions, this study conducts a state of the art survey in which 52 journal papers focusing on the applications of fuzzy MCDM models in civil engineering from 2016 to 2020 are reviewed. We respectively classify these articles according to research problems and research methods. Through the literature review, we get findings in terms of the most concerned decision-making problem, the most widely-used evaluation criterion and the most popular fuzzy MCDM model. Furthermore, we present four aspects of research challenges and corresponding future research directions in the field of civil engineering, which may be helpful for researchers and practitioners to further investigate.
引用
收藏
页码:358 / 371
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Multiple-criteria decision-making sorting methods: A survey
    Alvarez, Pavel Anselmo
    Ishizaka, Alessio
    Martinez, Luis
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2021, 183
  • [22] Survey of methods to visualize alternatives in multiple criteria decision making problems
    Kaisa Miettinen
    [J]. OR Spectrum, 2014, 36 : 3 - 37
  • [23] A FUZZY APPROACH TO THE MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION MAKING
    Sevcik, Vitezslav
    [J]. MENDEL 2008, 2008, : 198 - 202
  • [24] Cognitively Inspired Multi-attribute Decision-making Methods Under Uncertainty: a State-of-the-art Survey
    Hangyao Wu
    Zeshui Xu
    [J]. Cognitive Computation, 2022, 14 : 511 - 530
  • [25] Cognitively Inspired Multi-attribute Decision-making Methods Under Uncertainty: a State-of-the-art Survey
    Wu, Hangyao
    Xu, Zeshui
    [J]. COGNITIVE COMPUTATION, 2022, 14 (02) : 511 - 530
  • [26] A state-of-the-art survey on spherical fuzzy sets
    Ozceylan, Eren
    Ozkan, Baris
    Kabak, Mehmet
    Dagdeviren, Metin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2022, 42 (01) : 195 - 212
  • [27] State-of-the-art: Multi criteria decision making variables on solar PV business potential
    Idris, Abdul Malik Sadat
    Dhewanto, Wawan
    Anggoro, Yudo
    [J]. ENERGY REPORTS, 2022, 8 : 613 - 624
  • [28] State-of-the-art review on multi-criteria decision-making in the transport sector
    Yannis, George
    Kopsacheili, Angeliki
    Dragomanovits, Anastasios
    Petraki, Virginia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING-ENGLISH EDITION, 2020, 7 (04) : 413 - 431
  • [29] State-of-the-art review on multi-criteria decision-making in the transport sector
    George Yannis
    Angeliki Kopsacheili
    Anastasios Dragomanovits
    Virginia Petraki
    [J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering(English Edition), 2020, 7 (04) : 413 - 431
  • [30] State-of-the-Art Structural Health Monitoring in Civil Engineering
    Zinno, Raffaele
    Obrien, Eugene J.
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2023, 13 (21):