Water resource management and public preferences for water ecosystem services: A choice experiment approach for inland river basin management

被引:85
|
作者
Khan, Imran [1 ]
Zhao, Minjuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwest A&F Univ, Coll Econ & Management, 3 Taicheng Rd, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Assessment of river ecosystem; Willingness to pay; Choice experiment; Mixed logit model; Multinomial logit model; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; SPATIAL HETEROGENEITY; CONTINGENT VALUATION; SHIYANG RIVER; SUZHOU CREEK; FRESH-WATER; RESTORATION; STREAM; CHALLENGES; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.339
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The concept of ecosystem services provides a valuable approach for linking humans and nature and for supporting the protection of natural ecosystems. River water services, which influence public health and daily routines, have both social and ecological benefits to a surrounding area. However, river networks and their services have suffered extensive destruction due to urbanization and industrialization, especially in China. An assessment of river system benefits and recognition of public preferences are crucial for sustainable river management and effective river system restoration. The objective of this study was to assess a household's willingness to pay using a choice experiment (CE) with mixed logit and multinomial logit models. This technique was applied to evaluate a respondent's preferences regarding water service attributes such as upper basin, middle basin and lower basin ecological water distribution; water quality; and payment and the possible source of heterogeneity in these attributes. The estimated likelihood ratio test demonstrated that random parameter logit model (RPL) models had considerably more explanatory power than multinomial logit (MNL) models. It was also revealed that the RPL-II model was the most powerful among all the models, demonstrating the capability of that model to predict the choices of the respondents. Furthermore, the findings show that water quality was the most preferred river attribute, and households were willing to pay more for the water quality attribute that derives the highest marginal value. Household income level, residential location, education level, and sex were the main factors influencing willingness to pay. These assessments provide guidance, policy recommendations and a reference for researchers and policy makers to improve and enhance current river water services in the future. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:821 / 831
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Environmental water requirements and sustainable water resource management in the Haihe River Basin of North China
    Wei, Yanchang
    Miao, Hong
    Ouyang, Zhiyun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND WORLD ECOLOGY, 2008, 15 (02): : 113 - 121
  • [32] Integrated Water Resource Management and Energy Requirements for Water Supply in the Copiapo River Basin, Chile
    Suarez, Francisco
    Munoz, Jose F.
    Fernandez, Bonifacio
    Dorsaz, Jean-Marc
    Hunter, Christian K.
    Karavitis, Christos A.
    Gironas, Jorge
    WATER, 2014, 6 (09): : 2590 - 2613
  • [33] Ecosystem services and integrated water resource management: Different paths to the same end?
    Cook, Brian R.
    Spray, Christopher J.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2012, 109 : 93 - 100
  • [34] Water allocation for ecosystem management of the Missouri River
    Hesse, LW
    REGULATED RIVERS-RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT, 1995, 11 (3-4): : 299 - 311
  • [35] Climate services for sustainable resource management: The water-energy-land nexus in the Tarlung river basin (Romania)
    Tudose, Nicu Constantin
    Cheval, Sorin
    Ungurean, Cezar
    Broekman, Annelies
    Sanchez-Plaza, Anabel
    Cremades, Roger
    Mitter, Hermine
    Kropf, Bernadette
    Davidescu, Serban Octavian
    Dinca, Lucian
    Cacovean, Horia
    Marin, Mirabela
    Miksa, Katarzyna
    Pereira, Paulo
    LAND USE POLICY, 2022, 119
  • [36] Hydrological Modelling with the Tank Model for Water Resource Management of Nilwala River Basin
    Wickramarachchi, M.
    Wijesekera, N. T. S.
    ENGINEER-JOURNAL OF THE INSTITUTION OF ENGINEERS SRI LANKA, 2022, 55 (01): : 85 - 94
  • [37] ASSESSMENT OF INTEGRATED WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT SUSTAINABILITY OF ACEH MEUREUDU RIVER BASIN
    Masthura, Lely
    Wignyosukarto, Budi Santoso
    Sujono, Joko
    Nurrochmad, Fatchan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMATE, 2021, 21 (85): : 32 - 43
  • [38] A WEAP Model for Water Resource and Environmental Management in Moyang River Basin, China
    Xiao, Luanhui
    Qin, Huapeng
    Yu, Xiangying
    Cheng, Xiang
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 35TH IAHR WORLD CONGRESS, VOLS I AND II, 2013, : 3032 - 3038
  • [39] Strategic Study of Integral Water Resource and Environment Management of Haihe River Basin
    Che Hongjun
    Zhang Hui
    Tang Kewang
    RIVER BASIN RESEARCH AND PLANNING APPROACH, 2009, : 3 - 8
  • [40] Multi-region Negotiation Game for Water Resource Management of River Basin
    Ji, Fenghui
    2008 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, NETWORKING AND MOBILE COMPUTING, VOLS 1-31, 2008, : 8163 - 8166