Water resource management and public preferences for water ecosystem services: A choice experiment approach for inland river basin management

被引:85
|
作者
Khan, Imran [1 ]
Zhao, Minjuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwest A&F Univ, Coll Econ & Management, 3 Taicheng Rd, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Assessment of river ecosystem; Willingness to pay; Choice experiment; Mixed logit model; Multinomial logit model; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; SPATIAL HETEROGENEITY; CONTINGENT VALUATION; SHIYANG RIVER; SUZHOU CREEK; FRESH-WATER; RESTORATION; STREAM; CHALLENGES; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.339
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The concept of ecosystem services provides a valuable approach for linking humans and nature and for supporting the protection of natural ecosystems. River water services, which influence public health and daily routines, have both social and ecological benefits to a surrounding area. However, river networks and their services have suffered extensive destruction due to urbanization and industrialization, especially in China. An assessment of river system benefits and recognition of public preferences are crucial for sustainable river management and effective river system restoration. The objective of this study was to assess a household's willingness to pay using a choice experiment (CE) with mixed logit and multinomial logit models. This technique was applied to evaluate a respondent's preferences regarding water service attributes such as upper basin, middle basin and lower basin ecological water distribution; water quality; and payment and the possible source of heterogeneity in these attributes. The estimated likelihood ratio test demonstrated that random parameter logit model (RPL) models had considerably more explanatory power than multinomial logit (MNL) models. It was also revealed that the RPL-II model was the most powerful among all the models, demonstrating the capability of that model to predict the choices of the respondents. Furthermore, the findings show that water quality was the most preferred river attribute, and households were willing to pay more for the water quality attribute that derives the highest marginal value. Household income level, residential location, education level, and sex were the main factors influencing willingness to pay. These assessments provide guidance, policy recommendations and a reference for researchers and policy makers to improve and enhance current river water services in the future. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:821 / 831
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Water management in the Jordan River Basin: Towards an ecosystem approach
    Al-Jayyousi, Odeh
    Bergkamp, Ger
    MANAGEMENT OF TRANSBOUNDARY RIVERS AND LAKES, 2008, : 105 - +
  • [2] Assessing water ecosystem services for water resource management
    Grizzetti, B.
    Lanzanova, D.
    Liquete, C.
    Reynaud, A.
    Cardoso, A. C.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2016, 61 : 194 - 203
  • [3] Hydrological modeling for the Piracicaba River basin to support water management and ecosystem services
    Lopes, Tarcio Rocha
    Folegatti, Marcos Vinicius
    Duarte, Sergio Nascimento
    Zolin, Cornelio Alberto
    Fraga Junior, Luciano Sobral
    Moura, Larissa Bretas
    Oliveira, Rubmara Ketzer
    Almeida Santos, Otavio Neto
    JOURNAL OF SOUTH AMERICAN EARTH SCIENCES, 2020, 103
  • [4] Integrating Ecosystem Services Into Water Resource Management: An Indicator-Based Approach
    Shaad, Kashif
    Souter, Nicholas J.
    Vollmer, Derek
    Regan, Helen M.
    Bezerra, Maira Ometto
    ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 69 (04) : 752 - 767
  • [5] Integrating Ecosystem Services Into Water Resource Management: An Indicator-Based Approach
    Kashif Shaad
    Nicholas J. Souter
    Derek Vollmer
    Helen M. Regan
    Maíra Ometto Bezerra
    Environmental Management, 2022, 69 : 752 - 767
  • [6] Review of River Basin Water Resource Management in China
    Zhang, Hong
    Jin, Gui
    Yu, Yan
    WATER, 2018, 10 (04)
  • [7] Whitewater: Decentralization of river basin water resource management
    Dinar, Ariel
    Kemper, Karin
    Blomquist, William
    Kurukulasuriya, Pradeep
    JOURNAL OF POLICY MODELING, 2007, 29 (06) : 851 - 867
  • [8] The Underground Water Resource Management of the Yellow River Basin
    Xiao Sujun
    Bi Liming
    He Hongmu
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1ST INTERNATIONAL YELLOW RIVER FORUM ON RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT, VOL I, 2003, : 11 - 16
  • [9] Integrated water resource management for Kaoping River Basin
    Lin C.E.
    Kao C.M.
    Surampalli R.Y.
    Lai Y.C.
    Lee M.S.
    Wu C.Y.
    Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management, 2010, 14 (02) : 151 - 156
  • [10] Water use efficiency and integrated water resource management for river basin
    Deng, Xiangzheng
    Singh, R. B.
    Liu, Junguo
    Gueneralp, Burak
    PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY OF THE EARTH, 2015, 89-90 : 1 - 2