Understanding Public Opinions from Geosocial Media

被引:17
|
作者
Zhang, Shanqi [1 ]
Feick, Rob [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Waterloo, Dept Geog & Environm Management, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
[2] Univ Waterloo, Sch Planning, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
关键词
geosocial media; topic modelling; text analysis; public sentiment; user-generated content; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION-SYSTEMS; SOCIAL MEDIA; CITIZEN PARTICIPATION; EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS; DECISION-MAKING; E-GOVERNMENT; GIS; PLACE; ENGAGEMENT; FACEBOOK;
D O I
10.3390/ijgi5060074
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Increasingly, social media data are linked to locations through embedded GPS coordinates. Many local governments are showing interest in the potential to repurpose these firsthand geo-data to gauge spatial and temporal dynamics of public opinions in ways that complement information collected through traditional public engagement methods. Using these geosocial data is not without challenges since they are usually unstructured, vary in quality, and often require considerable effort to extract information that is relevant to local governments' needs from large data volumes. Understanding local relevance requires development of both data processing methods and their use in empirical studies. This paper addresses this latter need through a case study that demonstrates how spatially-referenced Twitter data can shed light on citizens' transportation and planning concerns. A web-based toolkit that integrates text processing methods is used to model Twitter data collected for the Region of Waterloo (Ontario, Canada) between March 2014 and July 2015 and assess citizens' concerns related to the planning and construction of a new light rail transit line. The study suggests that geosocial media can help identify geographies of public perceptions concerning public facilities and services and have potential to complement other methods of gauging public sentiment.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Measurement of public opinions on security: the case from Malaysia
    Sidek, Noor Zahirah Mohd
    Shaharudin, Mohd Rizaimy
    Abdullah, Wan Nailah
    Abd Hamid, Nur Zainie
    Noor, Norazam Mohd
    Arsad, Ab. Rahaman
    CRIME LAW AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2024, 82 (02) : 387 - 413
  • [42] Public understanding of the politics of global warming in the news media: the hostile media approach
    Kim, Kyun Soo
    PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2011, 20 (05) : 690 - 705
  • [43] Public concepts of CCS: Understanding of the Dutch general public and its reflection in the media
    de Best-Waldhober, Marjolein
    Brunsting, Suzanne
    Paukovic, Mia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2012, 11 : S139 - S147
  • [44] PUBLIC OPINIONS ABOUT PUBLIC WELFARE
    OGREN, EH
    SOCIAL WORK, 1973, 18 (01) : 101 - 107
  • [45] Understanding Public Sentiments, Opinions and Topics about COVID-19 using Twitter
    Kwan, Jolin Shaynn-Ly
    Lim, Kwan Hui
    2020 IEEE/ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN SOCIAL NETWORKS ANALYSIS AND MINING (ASONAM), 2020, : 623 - 626
  • [46] Scientists' opinions and attitudes towards citizens' understanding of science and their role in public engagement activities
    Llorente, Carolina
    Revuelta, Gema
    Carrio, Mar
    Porta, Miquel
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (11):
  • [47] The Limits of Legitimacy: Dissenting Opinions, Media Coverage, and Public Responses to Supreme Court Decisions
    LaRowe, Nicholas
    PERSPECTIVES ON POLITICS, 2018, 16 (01) : 242 - 243
  • [48] The Limits of Legitimacy: Dissenting Opinions, Media Coverage and Public Responses to Supreme Court Decisions
    Siwach, Twinkle
    POLITICAL STUDIES REVIEW, 2017, 15 (03) : 497 - 498
  • [49] Spatio-temporal analysis of meta-data semantics of market shares over large public geosocial media data
    Almaslukh, Abdulaziz
    Magdy, Amr
    Rey, Sergio J.
    JOURNAL OF LOCATION BASED SERVICES, 2018, 12 (3-4) : 215 - 230
  • [50] The Limits of Legitimacy: Dissenting Opinions, Media Coverage, and Public Responses to Supreme Court Decisions
    Hazelton, Morgan L. W.
    POLITICAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2017, 132 (01) : 170 - 171