The Brazilian Federal Supreme Court and the normalization of barbarity

被引：6

作者：

Flauzina, Ana ^{[1
]}

Pires, Thula ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Fed Bahia, Salvador, BA, Brazil

[2] Pontificia Univ Catolica Rio de Janeiro, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

来源：

DIREITO E PRAXIS | 2020年 / 11卷 / 02期

关键词：

Racism; Sexism; Legal Colonialism;

D O I：

10.1590/2179-8966/2020/50270

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

The paper aims to explain the legal-political vocabulary that informs the decisions of the Brazilian Supreme Court in a prison issue, giving prominence to the dimensions of race, gender, class and sexuality. In particular, it seeks to show the judicial action in the reproduction of the black genocide with decisive impacts for women and how the Supreme Court acts as a chancellor of barbarism installed in the criminal justice system.

引用

页码：1211 / 1237

页数：27

共 50 条

[21] 'Benchmarking' a Supreme Court and Federal Court Judge in Australia
Bartlett, Francesca
Douglas, Heather
ONATI SOCIO-LEGAL SERIES, 2018, 8 (09): : 1355 - 1385
[22] EARLY HISTORY OF THE FEDERAL SUPREME COURT
Bikle, Henry Wolf
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW REVIEW AND AMERICAN LAW REGISTER, 1923, 71 (03): : 297 - 298
[23] THE SUPREME-COURT AND THE FEDERAL SYSTEM
COX, A
CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW, 1962, 50 (05) : 800 - 820
[24] FEDERAL TAXATION AND THE SUPREME-COURT
LOWNDES, CLB
SUPREME COURT REVIEW, 1960, : 222 - 257
[25] Early History of the Federal Supreme Court
不详
LAW QUARTERLY REVIEW, 1923, 39 (153): : 126 - 127
[26] EARLY HISTORY OF THE FEDERAL SUPREME COURT
Haines, Charles Grove
ILLINOIS LAW REVIEW, 1923, 17 (06): : 483 - 487
[27] Early history of the Federal Supreme Court
不详
CORNELL LAW QUARTERLY, 1923, 8 (02): : 194 - 195
[28] Federal Appeals Court Responses to Supreme Court Precedent
Kassow, Benjamin J.
Fix, Michael P.
JUSTICE SYSTEM JOURNAL, 2022, 43 (03) : 339 - 352
[29] EARLY HISTORY OF THE FEDERAL SUPREME COURT
Cox, Theodore S.
VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW, 1922, 9 (02) : 166 - 167
[30] EARLY HISTORY OF THE FEDERAL SUPREME COURT
Lange, Ruth R.
CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW, 1922, 11 (01) : 62 - 62

← 1 2 3 4 5 →