The mean ten-year results of metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing arthroplasty

被引:12
|
作者
Amstutz, H. C. [1 ]
Le Duff, M. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] St Vincents Med Ctr, Joint Replacement Inst, Los Angeles, CA 90057 USA
来源
BONE & JOINT JOURNAL | 2018年 / 100B卷 / 11期
关键词
BONE-MINERAL DENSITY; SURFACE ARTHROPLASTY; FOLLOW-UP; ACETABULAR COMPONENT; ION CONCENTRATIONS; METAPHYSEAL STEM; CONTACT PATCH; WEAR ANALYSIS; REPLACEMENT; YOUNG;
D O I
10.1302/0301-620X.100B11.BJJ-2017-1459.R2
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims This study presents the long-term survivorship, risk factors for prosthesis survival, and an assessment of the long-term effects of changes in surgical technique in a large series of patients treated by metal-on-metal (MoM) hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA). Patients and Methods Between November 1996 and January 2012, 1074 patients (1321 hips) underwent HRA using the Conserve Plus Hip Resurfacing System. There were 787 men (73%) and 287 women (27%) with a mean age of 51 years (14 to 83). The underlying pathology was osteoarthritis (OA) in 1003 (75.9%), developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in 136 (10.3%), avascular necrosis in 98 (7.4%), and other conditions, including inflammatory arthritis, in 84 (6.4%). Results The mean follow-up time was 10.5 years (1 to 20). Using revision for any reason as the endpoint, the overall survivorship at 15 years was 89.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 86.8 to 91.4). There was a substantial increase between the first and second generation of surgical technique (86.6% vs 90.1%; p = 0.05). Men with idiopathic OA had a 15-year survivorship of 94.5% and women, 82.2% (p = 0.001); gender was not a risk factor after stratification by component size and aetiology. Using revision for excessive wear (ion levels > 7 mu g/l associated with symptoms or adverse local tissue reactions) as the endpoint, the 15-year survivorship was 98.5%. Risk factors for revision for all modes of failure were an underlying pathology of hip dysplasia, a contact patch to rim (CPR) distance of 7 mm or less, an age at surgery of 55 years or less, and a femoral component size of 46 mm or less. Specific risk factors for aseptic failure of the femoral component were early surgical technique, a cementless metaphyseal stem, and a body mass index of 24 kg/m(2) or less. \ Conclusion HRA is a viable concept; metal-on-metal bearings are well suited for this procedure when a well-designed device is properly implanted. The best results were obtained in men with OA, but survivorship was better for other underlying pathologies and for women after changes were made to the technique of implantation. Lifetime durability is a possible outcome for many patients despite a high level of activity.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:1424 / 1433
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing
    Quesada, Mario J.
    Marker, David R.
    Mont, Michael A.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2008, 23 (07): : 69 - 73
  • [22] Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing
    Ebied, A
    Journeaux, S
    CURRENT ORTHOPAEDICS, 2002, 16 (06): : 420 - 425
  • [23] Total hip arthroplasty in advanced osteonecrosis: The short-term results by metal-on-metal hip resurfacing
    Madadi, Firooz
    Eajazi, Alireza
    Kazemi, Seyyed Morteza
    Harandi, Armin Aalami
    Madadi, Firoozeh
    Sharifzadeh, Seyyed Reza
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2011, 17 (02): : CR78 - CR82
  • [24] Midterm results with Birmingham Hip Resurfacing/Synergy stem modular metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty
    Hosny, Hazem A. H.
    Srinivasan, Sreebala C. M.
    Keenan, Jonathan
    Fekry, Helmy
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA BELGICA, 2013, 79 (04): : 386 - 391
  • [25] Sex as a Patient Selection Criterion for Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty
    Amstutz, Harlan C.
    Wisk, Lauren E.
    Le Duff, Michel J.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2011, 26 (02): : 198 - 208
  • [26] Management Guidelines for Metal-on-metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty: A Strategy on Followup
    Nakano, Naoki
    Volpin, Andrea
    Bartlett, Jonathan
    Khanduja, Vikas
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2017, 51 (04) : 414 - 420
  • [27] Revision of metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip - The influence of malpositioning of the components
    De Haan, R.
    Campbell, P. A.
    Su, E. P.
    De Smet, K. A.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2008, 90B (09): : 1158 - 1163
  • [28] Management Guidelines for Metal-on-metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty: A Strategy on Followup
    Naoki Nakano
    Andrea Volpin
    Jonathan Bartlett
    Vikas Khanduja
    Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 2017, 51 : 414 - 420
  • [29] Hip Resurfacing Versus Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty Are Metal Ion Levels Different?
    Kuzyk, Paul R. T.
    Sellan, Michael
    Olsen, Michael
    Schemitsch, Emil H.
    BULLETIN OF THE HOSPITAL FOR JOINT DISEASES, 2011, 69 : S5 - S11
  • [30] Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty A review of periprosthetic biological reactions
    Mabilleau, Guillaume
    Kwon, Young-Min
    Pandit, Hemant
    Murray, David W.
    Sabokbar, Afsie
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2008, 79 (06) : 734 - 747