The mean ten-year results of metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing arthroplasty

被引:12
|
作者
Amstutz, H. C. [1 ]
Le Duff, M. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] St Vincents Med Ctr, Joint Replacement Inst, Los Angeles, CA 90057 USA
来源
BONE & JOINT JOURNAL | 2018年 / 100B卷 / 11期
关键词
BONE-MINERAL DENSITY; SURFACE ARTHROPLASTY; FOLLOW-UP; ACETABULAR COMPONENT; ION CONCENTRATIONS; METAPHYSEAL STEM; CONTACT PATCH; WEAR ANALYSIS; REPLACEMENT; YOUNG;
D O I
10.1302/0301-620X.100B11.BJJ-2017-1459.R2
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims This study presents the long-term survivorship, risk factors for prosthesis survival, and an assessment of the long-term effects of changes in surgical technique in a large series of patients treated by metal-on-metal (MoM) hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA). Patients and Methods Between November 1996 and January 2012, 1074 patients (1321 hips) underwent HRA using the Conserve Plus Hip Resurfacing System. There were 787 men (73%) and 287 women (27%) with a mean age of 51 years (14 to 83). The underlying pathology was osteoarthritis (OA) in 1003 (75.9%), developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in 136 (10.3%), avascular necrosis in 98 (7.4%), and other conditions, including inflammatory arthritis, in 84 (6.4%). Results The mean follow-up time was 10.5 years (1 to 20). Using revision for any reason as the endpoint, the overall survivorship at 15 years was 89.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 86.8 to 91.4). There was a substantial increase between the first and second generation of surgical technique (86.6% vs 90.1%; p = 0.05). Men with idiopathic OA had a 15-year survivorship of 94.5% and women, 82.2% (p = 0.001); gender was not a risk factor after stratification by component size and aetiology. Using revision for excessive wear (ion levels > 7 mu g/l associated with symptoms or adverse local tissue reactions) as the endpoint, the 15-year survivorship was 98.5%. Risk factors for revision for all modes of failure were an underlying pathology of hip dysplasia, a contact patch to rim (CPR) distance of 7 mm or less, an age at surgery of 55 years or less, and a femoral component size of 46 mm or less. Specific risk factors for aseptic failure of the femoral component were early surgical technique, a cementless metaphyseal stem, and a body mass index of 24 kg/m(2) or less. \ Conclusion HRA is a viable concept; metal-on-metal bearings are well suited for this procedure when a well-designed device is properly implanted. The best results were obtained in men with OA, but survivorship was better for other underlying pathologies and for women after changes were made to the technique of implantation. Lifetime durability is a possible outcome for many patients despite a high level of activity.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:1424 / 1433
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ten-year results of a double-heat-treated metal-on-metal hip resurfacing
    Daniel, J.
    Ziaee, H.
    Kamali, A.
    Pradhan, C.
    Band, T.
    McMinn, D. J. W.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2010, 92B (01): : 20 - 27
  • [2] Metal-on-Metal Hips: Ten-Year Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of the ADEPT Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing and Modular Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Mancino, Fabio
    Finsterwald, Michael A.
    Jones, Christopher W.
    Prosser, Gareth H.
    Yates, Piers J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (03)
  • [3] Clinical and Radiographic Results of Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing with a Minimum Ten-Year Follow-up
    Amstutz, Harlan C.
    Le Duff, Michel J.
    Campbell, Patricia A.
    Gruen, Thomas A.
    Wisk, Lauren E.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2010, 92A (16): : 2663 - 2671
  • [4] Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty
    Shimmin, Andrew
    Beaule, Paul E.
    Campbell, Pat
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2008, 90A (03): : 637 - 654
  • [5] Five- to Ten-Year Outcomes for Modular Metal-On-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Bernasek, Thomas L.
    Polikandriotis, John A.
    Levering, Melissa F.
    Dalury, David F.
    Fisher, David A.
    Adler, Michael J.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2013, 28 (07): : 1231 - 1234
  • [6] Hip resurfacing and metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty
    Beverland, David E.
    Spencer, Robert F.
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 21 (03) : 277 - 278
  • [7] Metal ion levels following resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip SERIAL RESULTS OVER A TEN-YEAR PERIOD
    deSouza, R. M.
    Parsons, N. R.
    Oni, T.
    Dalton, P.
    Costa, M.
    Krikler, S.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2010, 92B (12): : 1642 - 1647
  • [8] Complications After Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty
    Amstutz, Harlan C.
    Le Duff, Michel J.
    Campbell, Patricia A.
    Wisk, Lauren E.
    Takamura, Karren M.
    ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2011, 42 (02) : 207 - +
  • [9] Surface arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of the hip -: Hemiresurfacing versus metal-on-metal hybrid resurfacing
    Beaulé, PE
    Amstutz, HC
    Le Duff, M
    Dorey, F
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2004, 19 (08): : 54 - 58
  • [10] Michael Mont on metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty
    Mont, MA
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2004, 27 (10) : 1047 - 1048