Predicting Spontaneous Stone Passage in Prepubertal Children: A Single Institution Cohort

被引:15
|
作者
Dangle, Pankaj [1 ]
Ayyash, Omar [2 ]
Shaikh, Humza [1 ]
Stephany, Heidi A. [1 ]
Cannon, Glenn M. [1 ]
Schneck, Francis X. [1 ]
Ost, Michael C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Childrens Hosp Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Div Pediat Urol,Med Ctr, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Childrens Hosp Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Med Ctr, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
URETERAL STONES;
D O I
10.1089/end.2015.0565
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: No method currently exists for predicting which young child with a renal or ureteral stone will require surgery as opposed to pass the stone. Our goals were to analyze practice patterns at a major pediatric center and to identify factors that predicted spontaneous stone passage. Method: A retrospective review of all prepubertal patients (<= 11 years) presenting to our institution from January 2005 to July 2014 with symptomatic nephrolithiasis was performed. Demographic data and stone details were reviewed, including anatomic location, size, and outcomes. Spontaneous stone passage was determined by parental report and/or stone absence on imaging obtained within 6 months after initial diagnosis. Results: A total of 119 eligible patients were identified, with an average age of 88.7 months (4-143). Forty eight (40.3%) patients spontaneously passed their stone and the remaining 59.7% required endoscopic intervention. Overall, 79.0% had symptomatic presentation (flank pain, hematuria) and 39.5% of patients were obstructing stones. Symptomatic presentation was more common with ureteral (86.5%) than with renal (66.7%) stones, but was not associated with increased passage of stones in general (p-value 0.1765). Of the 48 patients who spontaneously passed stones, 11 (24.4%) were renal stones compared with 37 (50.0%) ureteral stones. The average size of spontaneously passed stones was 3.5 mm (2-8) for renal and 3.4 mm (1-7) for ureteral stones. Based on logistic regression, the single most important predictor of stone passage was stone size (p-value <0.001). The odds of passage were 3.1 times higher for ureteral stones compared with renal stones (p = 0.0070) when not controlling for size. Conclusion: In prepubertal patients, ureteral stones with an average size of 3.5mm or less are more likely to pass spontaneously. Based on this information, watchful waiting is a reasonable option in clinically stable nonseptic patients with renal/ureteral stones of this size.
引用
收藏
页码:945 / 949
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Applying urinary ultrasound to predict the risk of spontaneous ureteral stone passage: a retrospective cohort study
    Wang, Chang
    Di, Min
    Qin, Junchang
    Wang, Fangming
    He, Tianyu
    Zhang, Ruifang
    BMC UROLOGY, 2024, 24 (01):
  • [22] Role of the systemic immune-inflammation index in predicting spontaneous stone passage in patients with renal colic
    Mutlu, Huseyin
    Sert, Ekrem Taha
    Kokulu, Kamil
    Kankilic, Nazim Abdulkadir
    POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE, 2024, 136 (03) : 325 - 330
  • [23] Role of white blood cell and neutrophil counts in predicting spontaneous stone passage in patients with renal colic
    Sfoungaristos, Stavros
    Kavouras, Adamantios
    Katafigiotis, Ioannis
    Perimenis, Petros
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 110 (8B) : E339 - E345
  • [24] Patient Reported Outcomes Predicting Spontaneous Stone Passage May Not Have Acceptable Accuracy EDITORIAL COMMENTS
    Maganty, Avinash
    Jackman, Stephen V.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 204 (03): : 529 - 529
  • [25] Spontaneous ureteral stone passage: a novel and comprehensive nomogram
    Abou Heidar, Nassib
    Labban, Muhieddine
    Najdi, Jad
    Al Shami, Anwar
    Nasrallah, Oussama
    Nasr, Rami
    MINERVA UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2022, 74 (01): : 102 - 109
  • [26] SPONTANEOUS PASSAGE OF A HUGE URETERAL STONE IN A BILHARZIAL PATIENT
    SHOKEIR, AA
    SHAMAA, MA
    ERAKY, I
    GAWAD, MA
    ISMAIL, T
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 1995, 29 (03): : 341 - 343
  • [27] TIME TO SPONTANEOUS STONE PASSAGE; CAN IT BE SAFELY PREDICTED?
    Sountoulidis, Petros
    Bantis, Athanasios
    Koletsas, Nikolaos
    Chachopoulos, Vasilios
    Theodosiou, Alexandros
    Koptsis, Michael
    Paschalidis, Konstantinos
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (04): : E511 - E511
  • [28] SPONTANEOUS URETERAL STONE PASSAGE IN THE PRESENCE OF A URETERAL STENT
    Kuebker, Joseph
    Robles, Jennifer
    Kramer, Jordan
    Miller, Nicole
    Herrell, S. Duke
    Hsi, Ryan
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (04): : E919 - E920
  • [29] Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Prepubertal Children: 22-Year Experience at a Single Institution With a Single Lithotriptor
    Landau, Ezekiel H.
    Shenfeld, Ofer Z.
    Pode, Dov
    Shapiro, Amos
    Meretyk, Shimon
    Katz, Giora
    Katz, Ran
    Duvdevani, Mordechai
    Hardak, Benjamin
    Cipele, Helio
    Hidas, Guy
    Yutkin, Vladimir
    Gofritt, Ofer N.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 182 (04): : 1835 - 1839
  • [30] Management of Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax in Children: A Single Institution Protocol Analysis
    Stewart, Shai
    Fraser, James A.
    Rentea, Rebecca M.
    Aguayo, Pablo
    Juang, David
    Fraser, Jason D.
    Snyder, Charles L.
    Hendrickson, Richard J.
    Oyetunji, Tolulope A.
    St. Peter, Shawn D.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2023, 58 (08) : 1446 - 1449