Predicting Spontaneous Stone Passage in Prepubertal Children: A Single Institution Cohort

被引:15
|
作者
Dangle, Pankaj [1 ]
Ayyash, Omar [2 ]
Shaikh, Humza [1 ]
Stephany, Heidi A. [1 ]
Cannon, Glenn M. [1 ]
Schneck, Francis X. [1 ]
Ost, Michael C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Childrens Hosp Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Div Pediat Urol,Med Ctr, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Childrens Hosp Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Med Ctr, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
URETERAL STONES;
D O I
10.1089/end.2015.0565
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: No method currently exists for predicting which young child with a renal or ureteral stone will require surgery as opposed to pass the stone. Our goals were to analyze practice patterns at a major pediatric center and to identify factors that predicted spontaneous stone passage. Method: A retrospective review of all prepubertal patients (<= 11 years) presenting to our institution from January 2005 to July 2014 with symptomatic nephrolithiasis was performed. Demographic data and stone details were reviewed, including anatomic location, size, and outcomes. Spontaneous stone passage was determined by parental report and/or stone absence on imaging obtained within 6 months after initial diagnosis. Results: A total of 119 eligible patients were identified, with an average age of 88.7 months (4-143). Forty eight (40.3%) patients spontaneously passed their stone and the remaining 59.7% required endoscopic intervention. Overall, 79.0% had symptomatic presentation (flank pain, hematuria) and 39.5% of patients were obstructing stones. Symptomatic presentation was more common with ureteral (86.5%) than with renal (66.7%) stones, but was not associated with increased passage of stones in general (p-value 0.1765). Of the 48 patients who spontaneously passed stones, 11 (24.4%) were renal stones compared with 37 (50.0%) ureteral stones. The average size of spontaneously passed stones was 3.5 mm (2-8) for renal and 3.4 mm (1-7) for ureteral stones. Based on logistic regression, the single most important predictor of stone passage was stone size (p-value <0.001). The odds of passage were 3.1 times higher for ureteral stones compared with renal stones (p = 0.0070) when not controlling for size. Conclusion: In prepubertal patients, ureteral stones with an average size of 3.5mm or less are more likely to pass spontaneously. Based on this information, watchful waiting is a reasonable option in clinically stable nonseptic patients with renal/ureteral stones of this size.
引用
收藏
页码:945 / 949
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Radiological signs of stone impaction add no value in predicting spontaneous stone passage
    Popiolek, Marcin
    Liden, Mats
    Georgouleas, Petros
    Sahlen, Klara
    Sundqvist, Pernilla
    Jendeberg, Johan
    UROLITHIASIS, 2024, 52 (01)
  • [2] Inflammatory serum markers predicting spontaneous ureteral stone passage
    Abou Heidar, Nassib
    Labban, Muhieddine
    Bustros, Gerges
    Nasr, Rami
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEPHROLOGY, 2020, 24 (03) : 277 - 283
  • [3] Inflammatory serum markers predicting spontaneous ureteral stone passage
    Nassib Abou Heidar
    Muhieddine Labban
    Gerges Bustros
    Rami Nasr
    Clinical and Experimental Nephrology, 2020, 24 : 277 - 283
  • [4] Evaluation of the clinical significance of radiological signs of stone impaction in predicting spontaneous stone passage
    Popiolek, M. M.
    Sahlen, K.
    Liden, M.
    Sundqvist, P.
    Wagenius, M.
    Jendeberg, J.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2024, 85 : S775 - S775
  • [5] What is the role of inflammatory markers in predicting spontaneous ureteral stone passage?
    Senel, Cagdas
    Aykanat, Ibrahim Can
    Asfuroglu, Ahmet
    Keten, Tanju
    Balci, Melih
    Aslan, Yilmaz
    Tuncel, Altug
    AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 2022, 53 (05) : 448 - 453
  • [6] Can serum procalcitonin levels be useful in predicting spontaneous ureteral stone passage?
    Cilesiz, Nusret Can
    Ozkan, Arif
    Kalkanli, Arif
    Eroglu, Ali
    Gezmis, Cem Tugrul
    Simsek, Berkan
    Arslan, Burak
    BMC UROLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [7] Can serum procalcitonin levels be useful in predicting spontaneous ureteral stone passage?
    Nusret Can Cilesiz
    Arif Ozkan
    Arif Kalkanli
    Ali Eroglu
    Cem Tuğrul Gezmis
    Berkan Simsek
    Burak Arslan
    BMC Urology, 20
  • [8] Spontaneous passage of a pancreatic duct stone
    Rhee, J
    Scheiman, J
    Inadomi, J
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2003, 57 (02) : 278 - 280
  • [9] Patient Reported Outcomes Predicting Spontaneous Stone Passage May Not Have Acceptable Accuracy
    Stern, Joshua M.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 204 (03): : 530 - 530
  • [10] Nomogram predicting the probability of spontaneous stone passage in patients presenting with acute ureteric colic
    Gao, Chuanyu
    Peters, Max
    Kurver, Piet
    Anbarasan, Thineskrishna
    Jayaraajan, Keerthanaa
    Manning, Todd
    Cashman, Sophia
    Nambiar, Arjun
    Cumberbatch, Marcus
    Lamb, Benjamin W.
    Pickard, Robert
    Erotocritou, Paul
    Smith, Daron
    Kasivisvanathan, Veeru
    Shah, Taimur T.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 130 (06) : 823 - 831