Prey abundance and the strength of interference in a foraging shorebird

被引:93
|
作者
Triplet, P
Stillman, RA [1 ]
Goss-Custard, JD
机构
[1] Inst Terr Ecol, Furzebrook Res Stn, Wareham BH20 5AS, Dorset, England
[2] RN Baie de Somme, SMACOPI, F-80100 Abbeville, France
关键词
cockle Cerastoderma edule; foraging behaviour; interference competition; kleptoparasitism; oystercatcher Haematopus ostralegus;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2656.1999.00280.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Interference is an important component of food competition but is often difficult to detect and measure in natural animal populations. Although interference has been shown to occur between oystercatchers Mytilus edulis L., feeding on mussels Mytilus edulis L., four previous studies have not detected interference between oystercatchers feeding on cockles Cerastoderma edule L. In contrast, this study detected interference between cockle-feeding oystercatchers in the Bale de Somme, France. Prey stealing (kleptoparasitism), one of the main causes of interference between mussel-feeders, also occurred between oystercatchers in the Bale de Somme. The kleptoparasitism rate was related to the natural variation in the food supply, tending to be higher when cockles were rare. Feeding rate was negatively related to competitor density, so providing evidence for interference, but, as in mussel-feeders, only above a threshold density of about 50-100 birds ha(-1). The strength of interference at a fixed competitor density was related to the cockle food supply, usually being greater when cockles were rare. Previous studies probably failed to detect interference between cockle-feeders because competitor densities were too low, or cockles were too abundant, or because they were not conducted during late winter when interference is most intense. The study shows that natural variation in the food supply can influence the strength of interference within an animal population and provides support for those behaviour-based interference models which predict that the strength of interference will be greatest when competitor densities are high and prey scarce.
引用
收藏
页码:254 / 265
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] TIMING OF SHOREBIRD MIGRATION IN RELATION TO PREY DEPLETION
    SCHNEIDER, DC
    HARRINGTON, BA
    AUK, 1981, 98 (04): : 801 - 811
  • [32] Low prey abundance leads to less efficient foraging behavior in Steller sea lions
    Goundie, Elizabeth T.
    Rosen, David A. S.
    Trites, Andrew W.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MARINE BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY, 2015, 470 : 70 - 77
  • [33] Biases in the field estimation of shorebird prey sizes
    Lee, NM
    Hockey, PAR
    JOURNAL OF FIELD ORNITHOLOGY, 2001, 72 (01) : 49 - 61
  • [34] Predator search pattern and the strength of interference through prey depression
    Stillman, RA
    Goss-Custard, JD
    Alexander, MJ
    BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 2000, 11 (06) : 597 - 605
  • [35] Anthropogenic noise impairs foraging for cryptic prey via cross-sensory interference
    Halfwerk, Wouter
    van Oers, Kees
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 287 (1924)
  • [36] RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PREY ABUNDANCE AND FORAGING SITE SELECTION BY SEMIPALMATED SANDPIPERS ON A BAY OF FUNDY MUDFLAT
    WILSON, WH
    JOURNAL OF FIELD ORNITHOLOGY, 1990, 61 (01) : 9 - 19
  • [37] A role for liming as a conservation intervention? Earthworm abundance is associated with higher soil pH and foraging activity of a threatened shorebird in upland grasslands
    McCallum, Heather M.
    Wilson, Jeremy D.
    Beaumont, David
    Sheldon, Rob
    O'Brien, Mark G.
    Park, Kirsty J.
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 223 : 182 - 189
  • [38] Tree Swallow (Tachycineta bicolor) foraging responses to agricultural land use and abundance of insect prey
    Stanton, R. L.
    Morrissey, C. A.
    Clark, R. G.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 2016, 94 (09) : 637 - 642
  • [39] Correlated evolution of prey chemical discrimination with foraging, lingual morphology and vomeronasal chemoreceptor abundance in lizards
    William E. Cooper
    Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 1997, 41 : 257 - 265
  • [40] ON PREY MOBILITY, PREY RANK, AND FORAGING GOALS
    Ugan, Andrew
    Simms, Steven
    AMERICAN ANTIQUITY, 2012, 77 (01) : 179 - 185