Carbon Trading or Carbon Tax? A Computable General Equilibrium-Based Study of Carbon Emission Reduction Policy in China

被引:7
|
作者
Shen, Jing [1 ]
Zhao, Changheng [2 ]
机构
[1] Hubei Univ Educ, Big Data Modeling & Intelligent Comp Res Inst, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[2] Lanzhou Univ, Sch Econ, Lanzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
CGE model; carbon trading policy; carbon tax policy; mixed policy; carbon reduction policies; ECONOMIC-IMPACTS; MARKET;
D O I
10.3389/fenrg.2022.906847
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
To solve the environmental problems caused by climate change, the Paris Agreement urges China to accelerate the pace of CO2 emission reduction. Carbon trading and carbon tax have been considered the key instruments in reducing CO2 emissions. The focus of this article is not only to examine the impact of carbon trading and the carbon tax policy on China's macroeconomy but also to study the "carbon trading-carbon tax" mixed policy and make a comparative analysis based on the computable general equilibrium (CGE) model. We found that the mixed policy is more favorable to China's macroeconomy than a single carbon emission reduction policy and is conducive to improving people's welfare. If a carbon tax is carried out, a relatively mild and low carbon tax rate should be adopted to achieve China's carbon emission reduction goal and have a favorable impact on the macroeconomy. The main purpose of this article is to provide a theoretical basis and policy advices for the Chinese government in formulating innovative carbon reduction policies.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Comparison between International Trading System of Carbon Tax and Carbon Emission
    Niu, Huayong
    [J]. 2015 2nd International Conference on Creative Education (ICCE 2015), Pt 2, 2015, 11 : 440 - 444
  • [42] Two Emission Reduction Scenarios of Single Carbon Tax or Combined With Carbon Trading and Their Impacts on National Economics
    Wang, Zhiqiang
    Zhou, Jun
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2016 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MECHANICAL MATERIALS AND MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING (MMME 2016), 2016, 79 : 401 - 406
  • [43] An integrated tax-subsidy policy for carbon emission reduction
    Galinato, Gregmar I.
    Yoder, Jonathan K.
    [J]. RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2010, 32 (03) : 310 - 326
  • [44] Emission Reduction Benefits and Economic Benefits of China's Pilot Policy on Carbon Emission Trading System
    Wang, Zhijia
    Liang, Lijuan
    Cheng, Dong
    Li, Hujun
    Zhang, Yongheng
    [J]. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2022, 2022
  • [45] Emission Reduction Benefits and Economic Benefits of China's Pilot Policy on Carbon Emission Trading System
    Wang, Zhijia
    Liang, Lijuan
    Cheng, Dong
    Li, Hujun
    Zhang, Yongheng
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2022, 2022
  • [46] CARBON TRADING MARKETS-BASED FOR CARBON EMISSION PROJECT MANAGEMENT IN CHINA
    Li, Feifei
    Xu, Zhe
    [J]. ICIM'2016: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT, 2016, : 780 - 785
  • [47] A mathematical/physics carbon emission reduction strategy for building supply chain network based on carbon tax policy
    Li, Xueying
    Peng, Ying
    Zhang, Jing
    [J]. OPEN PHYSICS, 2017, 15 (01): : 97 - 107
  • [48] A Comparative Study between Carbon Tax and Carbon Trading Scheme Based on DSGE
    Zhao, Lixiang
    Yang, Chuxiao
    [J]. ICEME 2019: 019 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-BUSINESS, MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS, 2019, : 1 - 5
  • [49] Correction: Computable general equilibrium analysis of neutral carbon trading scheme and revenue recycling impacts on income distribution in China
    Lingli Qi
    Lei Zhao
    Yongqiang Zhang
    Shiqi Jiang
    Xinyue Lin
    Yishuai Ren
    [J]. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11 (1):
  • [50] How carbon trading policy should be integrated with carbon tax policy—laboratory evidence from a model of the current state of carbon pricing policy in China
    Hanting Wang
    Yuxuan Li
    Guoqin Bu
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 23851 - 23869