共 50 条
Long-term safety and efficacy in patients with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures treated with adjunctive lacosamide: Results from a phase III open-label extension trial
被引:74
|作者:
Husain, Aatif
[1
]
Chung, Steve
[2
]
Faught, Edward
[3
]
Isojarvi, Jouko
[4
]
McShea, Cindy
[4
]
Doty, Pamela
[4
]
机构:
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Barrow Neurol Inst, Phoenix, AZ 85013 USA
[3] Emory Univ, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[4] UCB Pharma, Raleigh, NC USA
来源:
关键词:
Lacosamide;
Open-label;
Long-term;
Safety;
Efficacy;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL;
REFRACTORY EPILEPSY;
CLINICAL-TRIALS;
THERAPY;
TOLERABILITY;
D O I:
10.1111/j.1528-1167.2012.03407.x
中图分类号:
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Purpose: To evaluate the long-term (up to 5 years exposure) safety and efficacy of lacosamide as adjunctive therapy in patients with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures taking one to three concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in open-label extension trial SP756 (NCT00522275). Methods: Patients who completed the double-blind trial SP754 (NCT00136019) were eligible to participate in this open-label extension trial (SP756). At the conclusion of trial SP754, patients had transitioned to lacosamide 200 mg/day. Subsequent dosage adjustments of lacosamide (100-800 mg/day) and/or concomitant AEDs were allowed to optimize tolerability and seizure reduction. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), vital signs, body weight, clinical laboratory data, electrocardiography studies, and seizure frequency were evaluated. Key Findings: A total of 308 patients received open-label lacosamide and 138 patients (44.8%) completed the longterm trial. The median modal dose (defined as the daily lacosamide dose a patient received for the longest duration during the treatment period) was 500 mg/day. The percentages of patients with lacosamide exposure >1, >2, >3, or >4 years were 75%, 63%, 54%, and 29%, respectively. Primary reasons for discontinuation were lack of efficacy (26%) and adverse events (11%). Common TEAEs (15%) were dizziness, headache, contusion, nausea, convulsion, nasopharyngitis, fall, vomiting, and diplopia. TEAEs that led to discontinuation in 1.0% of patients were dizziness (1.6%) and convulsion (1.0%). The median percent reductions from baseline of trial SP754 in 28-day seizure frequency were 53.4%, 55.2%, 58.1%, and 62.5%, respectively, for 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year completers. The 50% responder rates were 52.8%, 56.5%, 58.7%, and 62.5% for 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year completers, respectively. Seven of eight patients on lacosamide monotherapy for 12 months were deemed 50% responders. Of patients exposed to lacosamide 2 years, 3.1% remained seizure-free for a period 2 years. Significance: Long-term (up to 5 years) lacosamide treatment was generally well tolerated. The safety profile of lacosamide observed in this trial is consistent with that established in previous double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. Although the open-label trial design limits the analysis of efficacy, long-term reduction in seizure frequency and maintenance of efficacy was observed.
引用
收藏
页码:521 / 528
页数:8
相关论文