Evaluation of Various Pansharpening Methods Using Image Quality Metrics

被引:0
|
作者
Dhore, Ashish D. [1 ]
Veena, C. S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Technocrats Inst Technol, Dept Elect & Commun Engn, Bhopal, India
关键词
image fusion; multispectral (MS) image; panchromatic (PAN) image; remote sensing; special resolution; spectral resolution; pansharpening; SPECTRAL RESOLUTION IMAGES; FUSION; MULTIRESOLUTION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
The pansharpening has been a wide area of interest during these days because of its applications in remote sensing, geoscience. Day by day it is going deep, vast and interesting as well. The concept arises due to the fact that data provided by most earth observation satellites such as Ikonos, geoeye, quickbird and wordview2 are composed of several channels of multispectral image and single channel of panchromatic image. The pansharpening is derived from the fusion of these two images, which actually combines the characteristics of these two images. The image quality metrics provide the information about the special and spectral quality of the image. These special and spectral qualities are provided by the panchromatic and multispectral image. Most of the existing pan-sharpening quality assessment methods consider only the spectral quality and there are just few inventions which concentrate on these spatial characteristics. This paper presents a novel approach for spatial quality evaluation of pan-sharpening in high resolution satellite imagery. Obtained results clearly show the wide spatial discrepancy in quality of Pan-sharpened images, resulting from various pan-sharpening fusion methods which confirm the need for spatial quality valuation of fused products.
引用
收藏
页码:871 / 877
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Performance evaluation of image fusion quality metrics for the quality of different fusion methods
    Yu, Xianchuan
    Pei, Wenjing
    [J]. Hongwai yu Jiguang Gongcheng/Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2012, 41 (12): : 3416 - 3422
  • [2] An Evaluation of Image Quality Metrics
    [J]. J Photogr Sci, 1 (07):
  • [3] AN EVALUATION OF IMAGE QUALITY METRICS
    JACOBSON, RE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAPHIC SCIENCE, 1995, 43 (01): : 7 - 16
  • [4] Image quality metrics for the evaluation of print quality
    Pedersen, Marius
    Bonnier, Nicolas
    Hardeberg, Jon Y.
    Albregtsen, Fritz
    [J]. IMAGE QUALITY AND SYSTEM PERFORMANCE VIII, 2011, 7867
  • [5] Pansharpening and image quality interface
    Vijayaraj, V
    O'Hara, CG
    Younan, NH
    [J]. IGARSS 2004: IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1-7: SCIENCE FOR SOCIETY: EXPLORING AND MANAGING A CHANGING PLANET, 2004, : 2558 - 2560
  • [6] Analysis and Evaluation of Image Quality Metrics
    Samajdar, Tina
    Quraishi, Md Iqbal
    [J]. INFORMATION SYSTEMS DESIGN AND INTELLIGENT APPLICATIONS, VOL 2, 2015, 340 : 369 - 378
  • [7] Image fusion methods and comparisons based on various metrics
    Shandilya, Vijaya K.
    Ladhake, S. A.
    [J]. 2016 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND COMMUNICATION NETWORKS (CICN), 2016, : 290 - 293
  • [8] Impact of Pooling Methods on Image Quality Metrics
    Estrada, David Norman Diaz
    Pedersen, Marius
    [J]. 2022 ELEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING THEORY, TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS (IPTA), 2022,
  • [9] Color Image Database for Evaluation of Image Quality Metrics
    Ponomarenko, N.
    Lukin, V.
    Egiazarian, K.
    Astola, J.
    Carli, M.
    Battisti, F.
    [J]. 2008 IEEE 10TH WORKSHOP ON MULTIMEDIA SIGNAL PROCESSING, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2008, : 407 - +
  • [10] Ultrasound Transducer Quality Control and Performance Evaluation Using Image Metrics
    Sharawy, Amr A.
    Mohammed, Kamel K.
    Aouf, Mohamed
    Salem, Mohammed A. -M.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS AND INFORMATICS 2018, 2019, 845 : 26 - 39