Bridging the Gap Between CP-OFDM and ZP-OFDM for the Provision of Ultra-Low Latency Services in 5G

被引:4
|
作者
Ayadi, Raouia [1 ]
Kammoun, Ines [2 ]
Siala, Mohamed [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Carthage, Sup Com, MEDIATRON Lab, Ariana 2083, Tunisia
[2] Univ Sfax, ENIS, LETI Lab, Sfax 3038, Tunisia
来源
IEEE SYSTEMS JOURNAL | 2020年 / 14卷 / 01期
关键词
Cyclic prefix-orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (CP-OFDM); filter bank multicarrier (FBMC); flexible zero padding (FZP); intercarrier interference (ICI); intersymbol interference (ISI); latency; ping-pong optimized pulse shaping (POPS); signal to interference plus noise ratio (SINR); waveform design; zero padding (ZP) OFDM; fifth-generation (5G); DESIGN;
D O I
10.1109/JSYST.2019.2924249
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In this paper, we introduce and characterize a new filter bank multicarrier (FBMC) architecture, based on flexible zero padding (FZP), suitable for applications obeying stringent latency requirements. FZP conveniently distributes zeros between transmit (Tx) and receive (Rx) waveforms, and covers cyclic prefix (CP) and zero padding (ZP) as special extremal cases, providing, in this way, a bridge between classical CP-orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) and ZP-OFDM. It has the merit of being the only possible architecture that guarantees optimum confined and autonomous transmission and reception of each OFDM symbol within the symbol period, leading to a minimized latency. We assess the best achievable signal-to-interference-plus-noise-ratio (SINR) performances, of all possible FBMC configurations, obeying the FZP architecture, through a systematic optimization of their Tx and Rx waveforms, using the ping-pong optimized pulse shaping (POPS) algorithm. We also assess the whole communication link performance, in terms of raw and coded bit error rate (BER), for several representative FZP configurations. It turns out that the medium alternative between CP and ZP, which evenly distributes FZP between the Tx and Rx waveforms, does not provide a significant improvement in signal-to-interference ratio (SIR) and BER, for slightly time dispersive channels, but brings more robustness to time synchronization errors. The conducted study shows that conventional CP-OFDM remains an interesting alternative since it leads to an insignificant degradation in SIR, compared to the optimal FZP configuration, while providing a decorrelated noise at the receiver, beneficial for short coded packets.
引用
收藏
页码:603 / 613
页数:11
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [21] Reducing operational costs of ultra-reliable low latency services in 5G
    Varga, Jozsef
    Hilt, Attila
    Biro, Jozsef
    Rotter, Csaba
    Jaro, Gabor
    [J]. INFOCOMMUNICATIONS JOURNAL, 2018, 10 (04): : 37 - 45
  • [22] A new lower cost UL split option for ultra-low latency 5G fronthaul
    Touati, Hadjer
    Castel-Taleb, Hind
    Jouaber, Badii
    Akbarzadeh, Sara
    [J]. 2020 16TH INTERNATIONAL WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS & MOBILE COMPUTING CONFERENCE, IWCMC, 2020, : 1872 - 1878
  • [23] A Framework for TSN-enabled Virtual Environments for Ultra-Low Latency 5G Scenarios
    Garbugli, Andrea
    Rosa, Lorenzo
    Foschini, Luca
    Corradi, Antonio
    Bellavista, Paolo
    [J]. IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATIONS (ICC 2022), 2022, : 5023 - 5028
  • [24] Towards Zero Downtime Edge Application Mobility for Ultra-Low Latency 5G Streaming
    Vasilakos, Xenofon
    Featherstone, Walter
    Uniyal, Navdeep
    Bravalheri, Anderson
    Muqaddas, Abubakar Siddique
    Solhjoo, Navid
    Warren, Daniel
    Moazzeni, Shadi
    Nejabati, Reza
    Simeonidou, Dimitra
    [J]. 2020 IEEE CLOUD SUMMIT, 2020, : 25 - 32
  • [25] MIRA!: An SDN-based Framework for Cross-Domain Fast Migration of Ultra-Low Latency 5G Services
    Addad, Rami Akrem
    Dutra, Diego Leonel Cadette
    Taleb, Tarik
    Bagaa, Miloud
    Flinck, Hannu
    [J]. 2018 IEEE GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE (GLOBECOM), 2018,
  • [26] Radio Interface Design for Ultra-Low Latency Millimeter-Wave Communications in 5G Era
    Levanen, Toni
    Pirskanen, Juho
    Valkama, Mikko
    [J]. 2014 GLOBECOM WORKSHOPS (GC WKSHPS), 2014, : 1420 - 1426
  • [27] The Four-C Framework for High Capacity Ultra-Low Latency in 5G Networks: A Review
    Kelechi, Anabi Hilary
    Alsharif, Mohammed H.
    Ramly, Athirah Mohd
    Abdullah, Nor Fadzilah
    Nordin, Rosdiadee
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2019, 12 (18)
  • [28] Ultra-reliable low latency services: 5G architecture and operational alternatives with cost analysis
    Kiess, Wolfgang
    Lang, Ekkehard
    Hoffmann, Klaus
    Morper, Hans-Jochen
    Varga, Jozsef
    [J]. 2019 IEEE WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKING CONFERENCE (WCNC), 2019,
  • [29] Towards Fully Secure 5G Ultra-Low Latency Communications: A Cost-Security Functions Analysis
    Bordel, Borja
    Alcarria, Ramon
    Chung, Joaquin
    Kettimuthu, Rajkumar
    Robles, Tomas
    Armuelles, Ivan
    [J]. CMC-COMPUTERS MATERIALS & CONTINUA, 2023, 74 (01): : 855 - 880
  • [30] Ultra-Low Latency (ULL) Networks: The IEEE TSN and IETF DetNet Standards and Related 5G ULL Research
    Nasrallah, Ahmed
    Thyagaturu, Akhilesh S.
    Alharbi, Ziyad
    Wang, Cuixiang
    Shao, Xing
    Reisslein, Martin
    ElBakoury, Hesham
    [J]. IEEE COMMUNICATIONS SURVEYS AND TUTORIALS, 2019, 21 (01): : 88 - 145