Pollinator visitation to mass-flowering courgette and co-flowering wild flowers: Implications for pollination and bee conservation on farms

被引:10
|
作者
Knapp, Jessica L. [1 ]
Shaw, Rosalind F. [1 ]
Osborne, Juliet L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Exeter, Penryn Campus, Penryn TR10 9FE, Cornwall, England
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
Cucurbit; Pollination; Landscape; Bee conservation; AGRI-ENVIRONMENT SCHEMES; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; FORAGING RANGES; APIS-MELLIFERA; DIVERSITY; ABUNDANCE; BIODIVERSITY; CROPS; SIZE; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.baae.2018.09.003
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Managing the complex relationship between pollinators and their habitat requirements is of particular concern to growers of pollinator-dependent crop species, such as courgette (Cucurbita pepo). Naturally occurring wild flowers (i.e. agricultural weeds) offer a free, sustainable, and often underappreciated resource for pollinators, however, they may compete with crop flowers for visits. To understand the extent to which floral resources mediate pollinator visitation to courgette flowers and courgette fields, plant community and pollinator visitation data were collected at two spatial scales: field scale (in margins, and in the cropped area) and farm scale (500 m and 2000 m radii) for nine courgette fields across the UK. Apis mellifera (honeybees) and Bombus spp. (bumblebees) were the only pollinators observed to visit courgette flowers. Bumblebees were significantly more abundant on courgette flowers in fields with a greater species richness of wild flowers in the crop, whilst honeybees were significantly more abundant on courgette flowers in areas with less semi-natural habitat. For both honeybees and bumblebees, their abundance in field margins did not significantly reduce their abundance on courgette flowers, suggesting that wild flowers were not competing with courgette flowers for pollinator visitation. Although solitary bees were not observed to visit courgette flowers, their abundance and species richness in courgette fields were significantly greater with more semi-natural habitat and a greater species richness of wild flowers. Therefore, allowing uncultivated areas around the crop to be colonised by species-rich wild flowers is an effective way of boosting the abundance of bumblebees, which are important visitors to courgette flowers, as well as the abundance and species richness of solitary bees, thereby benefitting pollinator conservation. Crown Copyright (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier GmbH on behalf of Gesellschaft fur Okologie.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 94
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [21] Effects of an early mass-flowering crop on wild bee communities and traits in power line corridors vary with blooming plants and landscape context
    Du Clos, Brianne
    Drummond, Francis A.
    Loftin, Cynthia S.
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2022, 37 (10) : 2619 - 2634
  • [22] Effects of an early mass-flowering crop on wild bee communities and traits in power line corridors vary with blooming plants and landscape context
    Brianne Du Clos
    Francis A. Drummond
    Cynthia S. Loftin
    Landscape Ecology, 2022, 37 : 2619 - 2634
  • [23] Early-season mass-flowering crop cover dilutes wild bee abundance and species richness in temperate regions: A quantitative synthesis
    Riggi, L. G. A.
    Raderschall, C. A.
    Fijen, T. P. M.
    Scheper, J.
    Smith, H. G.
    Kleijn, D.
    Holzschuh, A.
    Aguilera, G.
    Badenhausser, I.
    Baensch, S.
    Beyer, N.
    Blitzer, E. J.
    Bommarco, R.
    Danforth, B.
    Gonzalez-Varo, J. P.
    Grab, H.
    Le Provost, G.
    Poveda, K.
    Potts, S. G.
    Rundloef, M.
    Steffan-Dewenter, I.
    Tscharntke, T.
    Vila, M.
    Westphal, C.
    Berggren, A.
    Lundin, O.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2024, 61 (03) : 452 - 464
  • [24] Visual signalling of nectar-offering flowers and specific morphological traits favour robust bee pollinators in the mass-flowering tree Handroanthus impetiginosus (Bignoniaceae)
    Schlindwein, Clemens
    Westerkamp, Christian
    Carvalho, Airton Torres
    Milet-Pinheiro, Paulo
    BOTANICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY, 2014, 176 (03) : 396 - 407