Novel Integrated Multi-Criteria Model for Supplier Selection: Case Study Construction Company

被引:84
|
作者
Stevic, Zeljko [1 ]
Pamucar, Dragan [2 ]
Vasiljevic, Marko [1 ]
Stojic, Gordan [3 ]
Korica, Sanja [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ East Sarajevo, Fac Transport & Traff Engn, Vojvode Misica 52, Doboj 74000, Bosnia & Herceg
[2] Univ Def Belgrade, Dept Logist, Pavla Jurisica Sturma 33, Belgrade 11000, Serbia
[3] Univ Novi Sad, Fac Tech Sci, Trg Dositeja Obradovica 6, Novi Sad 21000, Serbia
[4] Univ Union Nikola Tesla, Fac Ecol & Environm Protect, Cara Dusana 62-64, Belgrade 11000, Serbia
来源
SYMMETRY-BASEL | 2017年 / 9卷 / 11期
关键词
construction; rough number; EDAS; DEMATEL; MCDM; supply chain; DESIGN CONCEPT EVALUATION; DECISION-MAKING APPROACH; ROUGH SET-THEORY; MULTIPLE CRITERIA; FUZZY DEMATEL; VENDOR SELECTION; RISK-ASSESSMENT; MCDM APPROACH; HYBRID MODEL; ARAS-F;
D O I
10.3390/sym9110279
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Supply chain presents a very complex field involving a large number of participants. The aim of the complete supply chain is finding an optimum from the aspect of all participants, which is a rather complex task. In order to ensure optimum satisfaction for all participants, it is necessary that the beginning phase consists of correct evaluations and supplier selection. In this study, the supplier selection was performed in the construction company, on the basis of a new approach in the field of multi-criteria model. Weight coefficients were obtained by DEMATEL (Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory) method, based on the rough numbers. Evaluation and the supplier selection were made on the basis of a new Rough EDAS (Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution) method, which presents one of the latest methods in this field. In order to determine the stability of the model and the applicability of the proposed Rough EDAS method, an extension of the COPRAS and MULTIMOORA method by rough numbers was also performed in this study, and the findings of the comparative analysis were presented. Besides the new approaches based on the extension by rough numbers, the results are also compared with the Rough MABAC (MultiAttributive Border Approximation area Comparison) and Rough MAIRCA (MultiAttributive Ideal-Real Comparative Analysis). In addition, in the sensitivity analysis, 18 different scenarios were formed, the ones in which criteria change their original values. At the end of the sensitivity analysis, SCC (Spearman Correlation Coefficient) of the obtained ranges was carried out, confirming the applicability of the proposed approaches.
引用
收藏
页数:34
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Optimizing construction supplier selection in conflict-affected regions: a hybrid multi-criteria framework
    Hallak, Jamil
    [J]. OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT RESEARCH, 2024,
  • [32] A New Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model for Sustainable Supplier Selection Based on a Novel Grey WISP and Grey BWM Methods
    Ulutas, Alptekin
    Topal, Ayse
    Pamucar, Dragan
    Stevic, Zeljko
    Karabasevic, Darjan
    Popovic, Gabrijela
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (24)
  • [33] An integrated intuitionistic fuzzy set and stochastic multi-criteria acceptability analysis approach for supplier selection
    Ilbas, Ahmet
    Gurdere, Atilla
    Boran, Fatih Emre
    [J]. NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS, 2023, 35 (05): : 3937 - 3953
  • [34] A Novel Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model: Interval Rough SAW Method for Sustainable Supplier Selection
    Stevic, Zeljko
    Durmic, Elmina
    Gajic, Mladen
    Pamucar, Dragan
    Puska, Adis
    [J]. INFORMATION, 2019, 10 (10)
  • [35] Sustainable supplier selection in the textile dyeing industry: An integrated multi-criteria decision analytics approach
    Rahman, Md Mahfujur
    Bari, A. B. M. Mainul
    Ali, Syed Mithun
    Taghipour, Amirhossein
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION & RECYCLING ADVANCES, 2022, 15
  • [36] An integrated intuitionistic fuzzy set and stochastic multi-criteria acceptability analysis approach for supplier selection
    Ahmet İlbaş
    Atilla Gürdere
    Fatih Emre Boran
    [J]. Neural Computing and Applications, 2023, 35 : 3937 - 3953
  • [37] MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING FOR SUPPLIER SELECTION: A LITERATURE CRITIQUE
    Manucharyan, Hayk
    [J]. INDEPENDENT JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT & PRODUCTION, 2021, 12 (01): : 329 - 352
  • [38] BIDDING DECISION MAKING FOR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY USING A MULTI-CRITERIA PROSPECT MODEL
    Cheng, Min-Yuan
    Hsiang, Chia-Chi
    Tsai, Hsing-Chih
    Do, Hoang-Linh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2011, 17 (03) : 424 - 436
  • [39] MULTI-CRITERIA SUPPLIER SELECTION: AN ELECTRE-AHP APPLICATION
    Soner, Selin
    Onut, Semih
    [J]. SIGMA JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND NATURAL SCIENCES-SIGMA MUHENDISLIK VE FEN BILIMLERI DERGISI, 2006, 24 (04): : 110 - 120
  • [40] An extended hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision model for sustainable and resilient supplier selection
    Afrasiabi, Ahmadreza
    Tavana, Madjid
    Di Caprio, Debora
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (25) : 37291 - 37314