Adjuvant CMFVP versus adjuvant CMFVP plus ovariectomy for premenopausal, node-positive, and estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients: A Southwest Oncology Group study

被引:29
|
作者
Rivkin, SE
Green, S
OSullivan, J
Cruz, AB
Abeloff, MD
Jewell, WR
Costanzi, JJ
Farrar, WB
Osborne, CK
机构
[1] PUGET SOUND ONCOL CONSORTIUM, SEATTLE, WA USA
[2] SW ONCOL GRP, CTR STAT, SEATTLE, WA USA
[3] UNIV TEXAS, HLTH SCI CTR, SAN ANTONIO, TX USA
[4] UNIV TEXAS, MED BRANCH, GALVESTON, TX 77550 USA
[5] UNIV KANSAS, MED CTR, KANSAS CITY, KS 66103 USA
[6] JOHNS HOPKINS ONCOL CTR, BALTIMORE, MD USA
[7] OHIO STATE UNIV, CTR HLTH, COLUMBUS, OH 43210 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.1996.14.1.46
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine whether the addition of surgical ovariectomy to standard chemotherapy prolongs disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival in premenopausal patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive operable breast cancer with positive axillary nodes. Patients and Methods: Three hundred fourteen premenopausal patients with ER-positive, node-positive breast cancer were enrolled between July 1979 and July 1989. patients were stratified according to number of involved nodes and type of primary surgery and randomized to receive either of the following: (1) cyclophosphamide 60 mg/m(2)/d by mouth for 1 year, methotrexate 15 mg/m(2) intravenously (IV) weekly for 1 year, fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m(2) IV weekly for 1 year, vincristine .625 mg/m(2) IV weekly for the first 10 weeks, and prednisone weeks 1 to 10 with doses decreasing from 30 mg/ m(2) to 2.5 mg/m(2) (CMFVP); or (2) bilateral ovariectomy followed by CMFVP. Results: The median follow-up rime is 7.7 years and the maximum 13.2 years. Treatment arms ore not significantly different with respect to either survival or DFS (one-sided log-rank, P=.55 and .70, respectively), The 7-year survival rate is 71% on the CMFVP arm and 73% on CMFVP plus ovariectomy, No significant differences were observed in node or receptor level subsets. Conclusion: We conclude that, in this study, the addition of ovariectomy did not improve results over chemotherapy alone in the treatment of premenopausal women with node-positive, ER-positive, operable breast cancer, Our sample size was too small to detect a small improvement, The death hazards ratio of CMFVP/CMFVP plus ovariectomy was 1.22 (95% confidence interval [Cl], .79 to 1.89).
引用
收藏
页码:46 / 51
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Selection of adjuvant chemotherapy for treatment of node-positive breast cancer
    Trudeau, M
    Charbonneau, F
    Gelmon, K
    Laing, K
    Latreille, J
    Mackey, J
    McLeod, D
    Pritchard, K
    Provencher, L
    Verma, S
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2005, 6 (11): : 886 - 898
  • [42] SHORT-COURSE FAC-M VERSUS 1 YEAR OF CMFVP IN NODE-POSITIVE, HORMONE RECEPTOR-NEGATIVE BREAST-CANCER - AN INTERGROUP STUDY
    BUDD, GT
    GREEN, S
    OBRYAN, RM
    MARTINO, S
    ABELOFF, MD
    RINEHART, JJ
    HAHN, R
    HARRIS, J
    TORMEY, D
    OSULLIVAN, J
    OSBORNE, CK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1995, 13 (04) : 831 - 839
  • [43] Prospective Study of the Effect of the 21-Gene Assay on Adjuvant Clinical Decision-Making in Japanese Women With Estrogen Receptor-Positive, Node-Negative, and Node-Positive Breast Cancer
    Yamauchi, Hideko
    Nakagawa, Chizuko
    Takei, Hiroyuki
    Chao, Calvin
    Yoshizawa, Carl
    Yagata, Hiroshi
    Yoshida, Atsushi
    Hayashi, Naoki
    Hell, Susanne
    Nakamura, Seigo
    [J]. CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2014, 14 (03) : 191 - 197
  • [44] HER-2 expression and response to tamoxifen in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: A Southwest Oncology Group Study
    Elledge, RM
    Green, S
    Ciocca, D
    Pugh, R
    Allred, DC
    Clark, GM
    Hill, J
    Ravdin, P
    O'Sullivan, J
    Martino, S
    Osborne, CK
    [J]. CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 1998, 4 (01) : 7 - 12
  • [45] Adjuvant denosumab in postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer
    Lippman, Marc
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2019, 20 (03): : 312 - 313
  • [46] Adjuvant chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer patients: Which is the reference today?
    Fumoleau, P
    Bonneterre, J
    Luporsi, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (06) : 1190 - 1191
  • [47] Cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil versus tamoxifen plus ovarian suppression as adjuvant treatment of estrogen receptor-positive pre-/perimenopausal breast cancer patients: Results of the Italian Breast Cancer Adjuvant Study Group 02 Randomized Trial
    Boccardo, F
    Rubagotti, A
    Amoroso, D
    Mesiti, M
    Romeo, D
    Sismondi, P
    Giai, M
    Genta, F
    Pacini, P
    Distante, V
    Bolognesi, A
    Aldrighetii, D
    Farris, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (14) : 2718 - 2727
  • [48] Cost effectiveness of TAC versus FAC in adjuvant treatment of node-positive breast cancer
    Mittmann, N.
    Verma, S.
    Koo, M.
    Alloul, K.
    Trudeau, M.
    [J]. CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2010, 17 (01) : 7 - 16
  • [49] Determination of angiogenesis adds information to estrogen receptor status in predicting the efficacy of adjuvant tamoxifen in node-positive breast cancer patients
    Gasparini, G
    Fox, SB
    Verderio, P
    Bonoldi, E
    Bevilacqua, P
    Boracchi, P
    Dante, S
    Marubini, E
    Harris, AL
    [J]. CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 1996, 2 (07) : 1191 - 1198
  • [50] Weekly epirubicin plus tamoxifen versus tamoxifen alone as adjuvant treatment of operable, node-positive, elderly breast cancer patients
    Alliot, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (18) : 4237 - 4238