Accuracy of retention model parameters obtained from retention data in liquid chromatography

被引:6
|
作者
Brau, Tyler [1 ]
Pirok, Bob [1 ,2 ]
Rutan, Sarah [3 ]
Stoll, Dwight [1 ]
机构
[1] Gustavus Adolphus Coll, Dept Chem, 800 West Coll Ave, St Peter, MN 56082 USA
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Vant Hoff Inst Mol Sci, NL-1090 GD Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Dept Chem, 1001 West Main St, Richmond, VA 23284 USA
关键词
gradient retention factor; linear solvent strength theory; Neue-Kuss; retention model; HYDROPHILIC-INTERACTION; OPTIMIZATION; PERFORMANCE; SEPARATIONS; SIMULATION; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1002/jssc.202100911
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
In liquid chromatography, it is often very useful to have an accurate model of the retention factor, k, over a wide range of isocratic elution conditions. In principle, the parameters of a retention model can be obtained by fitting either isocratic or gradient retention factor data. However, in spite of many of our own attempts to accurately predict isocratic k values using retention models trained with gradient retention data, this has not worked in our hands. In the present study, we have used synthetic isocratic and gradient retention data for small molecules under reversed-phase liquid chromatography conditions. This allows us to discover challenges associated with predicting isocratic k values without the confounding influences of experimental issues that are difficult to model or eliminate. The results indicate that it is not currently possible to consistently predict isocratic retention factors for small molecules with accuracies better than 10%, even when using synthetic gradient retention data. Two distinct challenges in fitting gradient retention data were identified: 1) a lack of 'uniqueness' in the parameters and 2) an inability to find the global optimum fit in a complex fitting landscape. Working with experimental data where measurement noise is unavoidable will only make the accuracy worse.
引用
收藏
页码:3241 / 3255
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Recent applications of retention modelling in liquid chromatography
    den Uijl, Mimi J.
    Schoenmakers, Peter J.
    Pirok, Bob W. J.
    van Bommel, Maarten R.
    JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE, 2021, 44 (01) : 88 - 114
  • [42] SOLUTE RETENTION IN MICELLAR LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHY
    LAVINE, BK
    WHITE, AJ
    HAN, JH
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY, 1991, 542 (01): : 29 - 40
  • [43] Reliability of the retention factor estimations in liquid chromatography
    Escuder-Gilabert, L
    Bermúdez-Saldaña, JM
    Villanueva-Camañas, RM
    Medina-Hernández, MJ
    Sagrado, S
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2004, 1033 (02) : 247 - 255
  • [44] Retention behavior of statins in microemulsion liquid chromatography
    Shi Jiehua
    Xue Zhu
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY, 2011, 29 (02) : 152 - 156
  • [45] Simulating retention in gas-liquid chromatography
    Martin, MG
    Siepmann, JI
    Schure, MR
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B, 1999, 103 (50): : 11191 - 11195
  • [46] SOLUTE RETENTION IN MICELLAR LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHY
    LAVINE, BK
    HAN, JH
    WARD, AJI
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1990, 199 : 161 - ANYL
  • [47] Thermodynamic description of retention mechanism in liquid chromatography
    Bogusław Buszewski
    Renata Gadzała-Kopciuch
    Monika Michel
    Accreditation and Quality Assurance, 2011, 16 : 237 - 244
  • [48] Performance and modelling of retention in microemulsion liquid chromatography
    Pankajkumar-Patel, N.
    Peris-Garcia, E.
    Schiopu, O.
    Ruiz-Angel, M. J.
    Baeza-Baeza, J. J.
    Garcia-Alvarez-Coque, M. C.
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2020, 1634
  • [49] Computational prediction of retention times of veterinary antibiotics obtained by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry
    Rojas, Cristian
    Sarmiento, Nicole
    Ayora, Emilia
    Pis Diez, Reinaldo
    JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, 2024, 104 (11) : 6724 - 6732
  • [50] ACCURACY IN MODELING OF RETENTION INDEXES IN GAS-CHROMATOGRAPHY
    DIMOV, NP
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY, 1986, 360 (01): : 25 - 32