A double-blind evaluation of moexipril versus hydrochlorothiazide in hypertension

被引:0
|
作者
Mroczek, WJ
Stimpel, M
机构
关键词
angiotensin; angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE); ACE inhibitors; hydrochlorothiazide; hypertension;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Moexipril is the prodrug of a new long-acting nonpeptide, nonsulfhydryl angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor. After once-daily oral administration, moexipril in doses of 7.5 mg, 15 mg, or 30 mg demonstrates potent and specific competitive inhibition of ACE. Maximum reductions in blood pressure are seen within 3 to 6 hours of administration, and the antihypertensive effect persists for up to 24 hours. Two hundred thirty-eight patients with mild to moderate hypertension entered a single-blind placebo period. Of these, 200 patients subsequently entered a double-blind parallel study comparing moexipril 7.5 mg and 15 mg, hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg, and placebo once a day for 12 weeks. At the last predose measurement during the double-blind period, reductions in mean sitting diastolic blood pressure were 7.9 and 8.3 mm Hg with moexipril 7.5 mg and 15 mg, 3.1 mm Hg with placebo, and 8.8 mm Hg with HCTZ. Reductions were statistically significant at each 2-week measurement for all groups compared with placebo, except at week 10. Adverse effects were comparable in all drug groups and in the placebo group. in this double-blind study, the antihypertensive effect of both moexipril doses was comparable to that of HCTZ 25 mg daily. Moexipril 7.5 mg and 15 mg given once daily to patients with mild to moderate hypertension produced prompt, clinically important reductions in elevated blood pressure.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 87
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] TIAPAMIL AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE - A DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF 2 ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AGENTS
    STORM, TL
    BADSKJAER, J
    HAMMER, R
    KOGLER, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1987, 27 (01): : 18 - 21
  • [42] PINDOLOL IN HYPERTENSION - DOUBLE-BLIND TRIAL
    FELTHAM, PM
    TURNER, AS
    WATSON, OF
    DUNLOP, DJ
    PEEL, JS
    [J]. NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1972, 76 (484) : 167 - &
  • [43] DOUBLE-BLIND STUDY OF TREATMENT OF HYPERTENSION
    GRENFELL, RF
    BRIGGS, AH
    HOLLAND, WC
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1961, 176 (02): : 124 - &
  • [44] NITRENDIPINE VERSUS HYDRALAZINE IN THE TREATMENT OF HYPERTENSION - A DOUBLE-BLIND RANDOMIZED PARALLEL STUDY
    DEEDWANIA, P
    ANDREW, H
    THAO, T
    POONIA, M
    RENAUT, P
    [J]. CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1984, 32 (01): : A35 - A35
  • [45] Fosinopril versus enalapril in the treatment of hypertension: A double-blind study in 195 patients
    Hansson, L
    Forslund, T
    Hoglund, C
    Istad, H
    LederballePedersen, O
    Kristinsson, A
    Segaard, E
    Svensson, A
    Aarynen, M
    Wahrenberg, H
    Wennersten, G
    Kjellstrom, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY, 1996, 28 (01) : 1 - 5
  • [46] ENALAPRIL VERSUS CAPTOPRIL - A DOUBLE-BLIND MULTICENTER COMPARISON IN ESSENTIAL-HYPERTENSION
    RUMBOLDT, Z
    MARINKOVIC, M
    DRINOVEC, J
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY RESEARCH, 1988, 8 (03) : 181 - 188
  • [47] DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARATIVE TRIAL OF CAPTOPRIL VERSUS METHYLDOPA IN MILD AND MODERATE HYPERTENSION
    BHAT, OM
    MITRA, DK
    PATEL, K
    OKE, VG
    RAJKOTWALA, VA
    RAGHU, CN
    [J]. CURRENT THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 1986, 40 (01): : 92 - 98
  • [48] Eprosartan versus enalapril in elderly patients with hypertension:: A double-blind, randomized trial
    Ruilope, L
    Jäger, B
    Prichard, B
    [J]. BLOOD PRESSURE, 2001, 10 (04) : 223 - 229
  • [49] PIRETANIDE IN THE TREATMENT OF ESSENTIAL-HYPERTENSION - A DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON VERSUS PLACEBO
    VERHO, M
    RANGOONWALA, B
    BELOSO, M
    MAASS, L
    BENDER, R
    GARDUNO, D
    [J]. DRUGS UNDER EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1986, 12 (05) : 385 - 391
  • [50] DOUBLE-BLIND EVALUATION OF TRIMEPRAZINE
    LONDON, ID
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY, 1959, 80 (02) : 220 - 221