Some test examples of 2D and 3D contact problems involving Coulomb friction and large slip

被引：14
|
作者：
Feng, ZQ [1 ]
机构：
[1] Polytech Inst Sevenans, Dept Mech Engn, F-90010 Belfort, France
来源：
MATHEMATICAL AND COMPUTER MODELLING | 1998年 / 28卷 / 4-8期
关键词：
contact; friction; finite element; large slip; benchmark;
D O I：
10.1016/S0895-7177(98)00136-8
中图分类号：
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号：
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要：
In this paper, we propose three test examples of two- and three-dimensional contact problems with Coulomb friction and large slip. These examples are: (1) the contact between a 2D elastic slab and a rigid plate, (2) the contact between two semicircular rings, and (3) the contact between a 3D elastic block and a rigid surface. The finite element method is used for spatial discretization of solids and the frictional contact problems are modeled by means of the bipotential approach. Numerical results of all test examples are reported as detailed as possible for eventual comparison with other methods. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：469 / 477
页数：9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] On the integral equation formulations of some 2D contact problems
    Junghanns, P.
    Monegato, G.
    Strozzi, A.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2010, 234 (09) : 2808 - 2825
  • [22] NUMERICAL SOLUTIONS OF 2D AND 3D SLAMMING PROBLEMS
    Yang, Q.
    Qiu, W.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MARITIME ENGINEERING, 2011, 153 : A89 - A97
  • [23] A numerical dynamic behaviour model for 3D contact problems with friction
    Pop, Nicolae
    Vladareanu, Luige
    Popescu, Ileana Nicoleta
    Ghita, Constantin
    Gal, Alexandru
    Cang, Shuang
    Yu, Hongnian
    Bratu, Vasile
    Deng, Mingcong
    COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS SCIENCE, 2014, 94 : 285 - 291
  • [24] 2D AND 3D COMPUTATIONS OF LOSSY EIGENVALUE PROBLEMS
    SCHMITT, D
    STEFFEN, B
    WEILAND, T
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 1994, 30 (05) : 3578 - 3581
  • [25] Comparisons of the Semi-Smooth Newton Method for Solving Contact Problems in 2D and 3D
    Motyckova, Kristina
    Kucera, Radek
    Markopoulos, Alexandros
    Satek, Vaclav
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NUMERICAL ANALYSIS AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS 2016 (ICNAAM-2016), 2017, 1863
  • [26] 2D or 3D?
    Mills, R
    COMPUTER-AIDED ENGINEERING, 1996, 15 (08): : 4 - 4
  • [27] Existence results for the time-incremental elastic contact problem with Coulomb friction in 2D
    Ballard, Patrick
    Iurlano, Flaviana
    MATHEMATICAL MODELS & METHODS IN APPLIED SCIENCES, 2024, 34 (12): : 2217 - 2263
  • [28] A Unified 2D/3D Large-Scale Software Environment for Nonlinear Inverse Problems
    Da Silva, Curt
    Herrmann, Felix
    ACM TRANSACTIONS ON MATHEMATICAL SOFTWARE, 2019, 45 (01):
  • [29] 2D or not 2D That is the Question, but 3D is the, answer
    Cronin, Paul
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2007, 14 (07) : 769 - 771
  • [30] A DMLPG refinement technique for 2D and 3D potential problems
    Mazzia, Annamaria
    Pini, Giorgio
    Sartoretto, Flavio
    CMES - Computer Modeling in Engineering and Sciences, 2015, 108 (04): : 239 - 262
12345