Labor productivity and firm-level TFP with technology-specific production functions

被引:13
|
作者
Battisti, Michele [1 ,2 ]
Belloc, Filippo [3 ]
Del Gatto, Massimo [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Palermo, CeLEG LUISS Guido Carli, Palermo, Italy
[2] RCEA, Rimini, Italy
[3] Univ Siena, Siena, Italy
[4] Univ G dAnnunzio, LUISS Guido Carli, Chieti, Italy
[5] CRENoS, Cagliari, Italy
关键词
TFP; Technology adoption; Production function estimation; Mixture models; GROWTH; DISTORTIONS; MISALLOCATION; ALLOCATION; VARIABLES; SELECTION; TRADE;
D O I
10.1016/j.red.2019.07.003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We investigate the technological dimension of productivity, presenting an empirical methodology based on mixture models to disentangle the labor productivity differences associated with the firm's choice of technology (BTFP) and those related to the firm's ability to exploit the adopted technology (WTFP). The estimation endogenously determines the number of technologies (in the sector) and degree of technology sharing across firms (i.e., for each firm, the probability of using a given technology). By using comparable data for about 35,000 firms worldwide distributed across 22 (two-digit) sectors, we show BTFP to be at least as important as WTFP in explaining the labor productivity gaps across firms. Intra-sectoral and inter-sectoral heterogeneity is substantial and, even in sectors in which BTFP dominates on average, we find a considerable number of firms for which labor productivity is mostly determined by the ability to use the adopted technology. Hence, dissecting the labor productivity gaps is crucial to achieving more targeted innovation policies. The estimated number of technologies ranges from one (in only three industries) to five, being three in most cases. The suggested estimation strategy takes simultaneity into account. The BTFP measure is unaffected by omitted price bias. The presence of BTFP dispersion can be associated with the action of frictions preventing firms from switching to superior and more productive technologies. Eliminating BTFP does not eliminate misallocation. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 300
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Firm-level interactions between exporting and productivity: Industry-specific evidence
    David Greenaway
    Zhihong Yu
    [J]. Review of World Economics, 2004, 140 : 376 - 392
  • [42] Agglomeration economies and firm-level labor misallocation
    Fontagne, Lionel
    Santoni, Gianluca
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 19 (01) : 251 - 272
  • [43] Beyond the modern productivity paradox: The effect of robotics technology on firm-level total factor productivity in China
    Zhang, Yi
    Wang, Ting
    Liu, Chun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ASIAN ECONOMICS, 2024, 90
  • [44] Technology shocks and the Labor-Input response: Evidence from firm-level data
    Carlsson, Mikael
    Smedsaas, Jon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MONEY CREDIT AND BANKING, 2007, 39 (06) : 1509 - 1520
  • [45] Export Behavior and Firm Productivity in German Manufacturing: A Firm-Level Analysis
    Jens Matthias Arnold
    Katrin Hussinger
    [J]. Review of World Economics, 2005, 141 : 219 - 243
  • [46] Export behavior and firm productivity in German manufacturing: A firm-level analysis
    Arnold, JM
    Hussinger, K
    [J]. REVIEW OF WORLD ECONOMICS, 2005, 141 (02) : 219 - 243
  • [47] Exporting and Environmental Performance: A Firm-level Productivity Analysis
    Galdeano-Gomez, Emilio
    [J]. WORLD ECONOMY, 2010, 33 (01): : 60 - 88
  • [48] (Mis)alignment of productivity and wages: firm-level evidence
    Konings, Jozef
    Rycx, Francois
    Vandenberghe, Vincent
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANPOWER, 2016, 37 (02) : 190 - 196
  • [49] THE IMPACT OF TRAINING ON PRODUCTIVITY AND WAGES: FIRM-LEVEL EVIDENCE
    Konings, Jozef
    Vanormelingen, Stijn
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2015, 97 (02) : 485 - 497
  • [50] Agglomeration and productivity: evidence from firm-level data
    Martin Andersson
    Hans Lööf
    [J]. The Annals of Regional Science, 2011, 46 : 601 - 620