A comparison of methods to compute the point of force application in handrim wheelchair propulsion: a technical note

被引:0
|
作者
Sabick, MB [1 ]
Zhao, KD [1 ]
An, KN [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Dept Orthoped, Orthopaed Biomech Lab, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
来源
关键词
biomechanics; upper limb; wheelchair;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Several methods are available for computing the location of the point of force application (PFA) in manual wheelchair propulsion using kinetic data. We compared five different techniques for computing the PFA location in analysis of data from five wheelchair users propelling their own wheelchairs using their normal propulsion style. The effects of the assumptions used in the calculations on the resulting location of the PFA, handrim force and moment components, and mechanical efficiency (e) were quantified. When kinetic data were used to locate the PFA, the most consistent and stable results were obtained using the assumptions that components of the handrim moment about the anteriorly directed and vertically directed axes were negligible. Some assumptions led to unsolvable equations at points during the propulsion cycle, demonstrating that they were inappropriate. All PFA values calculated with kinetic data were unstable at the beginning and end of the propulsion phase. While differences exist due to individual technique, assuming handrim moment components about the anterior-posterior, vertical, and/or both axes resulted in the most representative results.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 68
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Sprint performance and force application of tennis players during manual wheelchair propulsion with and without holding a tennis racket
    Alberca, Ilona
    Chenier, Felix
    Astier, Marjolaine
    Watelain, Eric
    Vallier, Jean-Marc
    Pradon, Didier
    Faupin, Arnaud
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (02):
  • [22] The Influence Of Push Frequency On Force Application During Steady-State Hand-rim Wheelchair Propulsion
    Goosey-Tolfrey, Vicky L.
    Lenton, John P.
    Fowler, Neil
    van der Woude, Lucas
    Nicholson, Graham
    [J]. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2006, 38 (05): : S395 - S396
  • [23] Technical note: comparison of methods for threshold selection for extreme sea levels
    Caballero-Megido, C.
    Hillier, J.
    Wyncoll, D.
    Bosher, L.
    Gouldby, B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT, 2018, 11 (02): : 127 - 140
  • [24] TECHNICAL NOTE - COMPARISON OF IN-VITRO AND IN-SITU DIGESTIBILITY METHODS
    VAREL, VH
    KREIKEMEIER, KK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1995, 73 (02) : 578 - 582
  • [25] Technical note: A comparison of 2 methods of assessing lameness prevalence in tiestall herds
    Gibbons, Jenny
    Haley, Derek B.
    Cutler, Janet Higginson
    Nash, Clemence
    Heyerhoff, Jessica Zaffino
    Pellerin, Doris
    Adam, Steve
    Fournier, Alain
    de Passille, Anne Marie
    Rushen, Jeffrey
    Vasseurll, Elsa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2014, 97 (01) : 350 - 353
  • [26] Technical note: Comparison of two methods to quantify exercise energy expenditure in trotters
    Fortier, J.
    Deley, G.
    Julliand, V.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2015, 93 (03) : 1145 - 1148
  • [27] Technical note: Comparison of biomarker and molecular biological methods for estimating methanogen abundance
    McCartney, C. A.
    Bull, I. D.
    Waters, S. M.
    Dewhurst, R. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2013, 91 (12) : 5724 - 5728
  • [28] Technical note: A problem for comparison of numerical methods for radiation from vibrating panels
    Farstad, JE
    Lee, MR
    [J]. NOISE CONTROL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 1996, 44 (05) : 256 - 260
  • [29] Technical Note: Rod phantom analysis for comparison of PET detector sampling and reconstruction methods
    Wollenweber, Scott D.
    Kemp, Brad J.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (11) : 6175 - 6185
  • [30] Technical note -: A comparison of methods used to measure eating and ruminating activity in confined dairy cattle
    Kononoff, PJ
    Lehman, HA
    Heinrichs, AJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2002, 85 (07) : 1801 - 1803