Electrophysiological evidence for both perceptual and postperceptual selection during the attentional blink

被引:40
|
作者
Giesbrecht, Barry [1 ]
Sy, Jocelyn L. [1 ]
Elliott, James C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Dept Psychol, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1162/jocn.2007.19.12.2005
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
When two masked targets are presented in rapid succession, correct identification of the first target (TI) leads to a dramatic impairment in identification of the second target (T2). Several studies of this so-called attentional blink (AB) phenomenon have provided behavioral and physiological evidence that T2 is processed to the semantic level, despite the profound impairment in T2 report. These findings have been interpreted as an example of perception without awareness and have been explained by models that assume that T2 is processed extensively even though it does not gain access into consciousness. The present study reports two experiments that test this assumption. In Experiment 1, the perceptual load of the T1 task was manipulated and T2 was a word that was either related or unrelated to a context word presented at the beginning of each trial. The event-related potential (ERP) technique was used to isolate the context-sensitive N400 component evoked by the T2 word. The ERP data revealed that there was a complete suppression of the N400 during the AB when the perceptual load was high, but not when perceptual load was low. Experiment 2 replicated the high-load condition of Experiment 1 while ruling out two alternative explanations for the reduction of the N400 during the AB. The results of both experiments demonstrate that word meanings are not always accessed during the AB and are consistent with studies that suggest that attention can act to select information at multiple stages of processing depending on concurrent task demands.
引用
收藏
页码:2005 / 2018
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Sources of the attentional blink during rapid serial visual presentation: Perceptual interference and retrieval competition
    Maki, WS
    Couture, T
    Frigen, K
    Lien, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1997, 23 (05) : 1393 - 1411
  • [42] Hemispheric interactions during "attentional blink"
    Kavcic, V
    Snapp, M
    Doty, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2002, : 150 - 150
  • [43] No evidence for a prolonged attentional blink in developmental dyslexia
    McLean, Gregor M. T.
    Castles, Anne
    Coltheart, Veronika
    Stuart, Geoffrey W.
    [J]. CORTEX, 2010, 46 (10) : 1317 - 1329
  • [44] Electrophysiological correlates of attended and unattended word processing within the attentional blink
    Rolke, B
    Heil, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 19 (02) : 140 - 140
  • [45] Attentional switching in spatial and nonspatial domains: Evidence from the attentional blink
    Visser, TAW
    Bischof, WF
    Di Lollo, V
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1999, 125 (04) : 458 - 469
  • [46] Evidence for distinct attentional bottlenecks in attention switching and attentional blink tasks
    Peterson, MS
    Juola, JF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 127 (01): : 6 - 26
  • [47] Perceptual grouping operates independently of attentional selection: Evidence from hemispatial neglect
    Sarah Shomstein
    Ruth Kimchi
    Maxim Hammer
    Marlene Behrmann
    [J]. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2010, 72 : 607 - 618
  • [48] Post-perceptual processing during the attentional blink is modulated by inter-trial task expectancies
    Sy, Jocelyn L.
    Elliott, James C.
    Giesbrecht, Barry
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 7
  • [49] Perceptual load modulates the processing of distractors presented at task-irrelevant locations during the attentional blink
    Elliott, James C.
    Giesbrecht, Barry
    [J]. ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2010, 72 (08) : 2106 - 2114
  • [50] The attentional blink: Past, present, and future of a blind spot in perceptual awareness
    Martens, Sander
    Wyble, Brad
    [J]. NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2010, 34 (06): : 947 - 957