Current Research Priorities in Healthcare Simulation Results of a Delphi Survey

被引:6
|
作者
Anton, Nicholas [1 ]
Calhoun, Aaron C. [2 ]
Stefanidis, Dimitrios [1 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Dept Surg, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] Univ Louisville, Dept Pediat, Louisville, KY 40292 USA
关键词
Healthcare simulation; research priorities; research agenda; Delphi methodology; EDUCATION;
D O I
10.1097/SIH.0000000000000564
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction In 2011 and 2017, the Society for Simulation in Healthcare Research Committee convened summits to develop a forward-thinking agenda for simulation research. After the second summit, the Society for Simulation in Healthcare Research Committee sought expert opinion on the most important research questions in healthcare simulation. This study used systematic methodology to develop a prioritized research agenda for healthcare simulation. Methods A modified Delphi approach was conducted in 3 survey rounds. During round 1, individuals with expertise in healthcare simulation research were recruited to submit important research questions. Submitted questions were reviewed and duplicates were removed. Remaining questions were synthesized into a concise, high-level list for further rating. During round 2, these reformulated questions were distributed to the same experts who ranked their importance on a 5-point Likert scale. Average question importance ratings were calculated and shared during round 3, and a final vote was taken to identify the highest priority items. Results Seventeen experts submitted 74 questions, which were reduced to 21 reformulated items. Variability in expert responses decreased significantly across survey rounds, indicating that consensus had been achieved. The top 3 research question identified by the experts were related to (1) the impact of system level simulation interventions on system efficiency, patient safety, and patient outcomes; (2) the return on investment of simulation for healthcare systems, and (3) whether a dose-response relationship exists between simulation training and performance/patient outcomes. Conclusions The agenda developed in this study may help guide and focus researcher efforts and funding agency decisions, ultimately helping advance the field.
引用
收藏
页码:E1 / E7
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Consensus research priorities for cerebral palsy: a Delphi survey of consumers, researchers, and clinicians
    McIntyre, Sarah
    Novak, Iona
    Cusick, Anne
    [J]. DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINE AND CHILD NEUROLOGY, 2010, 52 (03): : 270 - 275
  • [22] Identifying the research priorities of healthcare professionals in UK vascular surgery: modified Delphi approach
    Smith, G. E.
    Long, J.
    Wallace, T.
    Carradice, D.
    Chetter, I. C.
    [J]. BJS OPEN, 2021, 5 (02):
  • [23] Priorities for sweetpotato research in developing countries: Results of a survey
    Fuglie, Keith O.
    [J]. HORTSCIENCE, 2007, 42 (05) : 1200 - 1206
  • [24] Priorities for potato research in developing countries: Results of a survey
    Fuglie, Keith O.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POTATO RESEARCH, 2007, 84 (05) : 353 - 365
  • [25] Priorities for potato research in developing countries: Results of a survey
    Keith O. Fuglie
    [J]. American Journal of Potato Research, 2007, 84 : 353 - 365
  • [26] Core competences in genetics for healthcare professionals: results of a review and a Delphi survey
    Tognetto, A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2017, 27 : 444 - 444
  • [27] Identification of translational dermatology research priorities in the UK: results of an electronic Delphi exercise
    Healy, E.
    Brown, S. J.
    Langan, S. M.
    Nicholls, S. G.
    Shams, K.
    Reynolds, N. J.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2015, 173 (05) : 1191 - 1198
  • [28] Results of an e-Delphi exercise on translational dermatology research priorities in the UK
    Shams, K.
    Brown, S.
    Langan, S.
    Nicholls, S.
    Healy, E.
    Reynolds, N.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2015, 172 (05) : E39 - E39
  • [29] Identifying patient safety research priorities in Estonia: results of a Delphi consensus study
    Freimann, Tiina
    Polluste, Kaja
    Calsbeek, Hilly
    Kangasniemi, Mari
    Lember, Margus
    Orrego, Carola
    Vall-Roque, Helena
    van Tuijl, Anne
    Starkopf, Joel
    [J]. BMJ OPEN QUALITY, 2022, 11 (03)
  • [30] An International Delphi Survey on Exercise Priorities in CKD
    Labib, Mary
    Bohm, Clara
    MacRae, Jennifer M.
    Bennett, Paul N.
    Wilund, Kenneth R.
    McAdams-DeMarco, Mara
    Jhamb, Manisha
    Mustata, Stefan
    Thompson, Stephanie
    [J]. KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL REPORTS, 2021, 6 (03): : 657 - 668