Effect of bolus injection versus continuous infusion of furosemide on diuresis and neurohormonal activation in patients with severe congestive heart failure

被引:31
|
作者
Aaser, E [1 ]
Gullestad, L [1 ]
Tollofsrud, S [1 ]
Lundberg, J [1 ]
Hall, C [1 ]
Djoseland, O [1 ]
Kjekshus, J [1 ]
Forfang, K [1 ]
机构
[1] KAROLINSKA INST,INST PHYSIOL & PHARMACOL,STOCKHOLM,SWEDEN
关键词
antidiuretic hormone; big-endothelin; epinephrine; neuropeptide Y; norepinephrine; pro-ANF;
D O I
10.3109/00365519709099409
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Previous studies have demonstrated that continuous infusion of furosemide results in increased diuresis and natriuresis compared with bolus administration of the drug in patients with severe heart failure. We reasoned that continuous infusion of furosemide caused less activation of neurohumoral mechanisms, since other studies have shown that bolus administration of furosemide may activate this system. We therefore tested the hypothesis that continuous administration of furosemide would increase water and sodium excretion due to less activation of neurohormones. Eight patients with severe heart failure were studied during continuous infusion over 24 h and bolus injections of furosemide twice daily in a randomized cross-over study. Bolus administration of furosemide increased diuresis and natriuresis significantly in the first 4 h after administration compared with continuous administration, but this was later reversed, resulting in similar 24 h total output. The neurohormones measured at baseline were all markedly elevated. Neither regimens of furosemide caused any further significant changes in neurohumoral response except that pro-ANF decreased more during the first 8 h after bolus administration compared to continuous infusion. This study:has demonstrated that bolus administration of furosemide in conventional doses is equally effective as continuous intravenous infusion in patients with severe heart failure. This may be due to maximal neurohormonal activation in severe heart failure (NYHA III-IV) which could not be further activated by bolus administration.
引用
收藏
页码:361 / 367
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Continuous Versus Intermittent Infusion of Furosemide in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure
    Thomson, Margaret R.
    Nappi, Jean M.
    Dunn, Steven P.
    Hollis, Ian B.
    Rodgers, Jo E.
    Van Bakel, Adrian B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2010, 16 (03) : 188 - 193
  • [22] CONTINUOUS INFUSION VERSUS INTERMITTENT BOLUS FUROSEMIDE FOR ACUTE DECOMPENSATED HEART FAILURE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Shastri, Pinang
    Burmeister, Cameron
    Tomcho, Jeremy
    Patel, Mitra
    Elzanaty, Ahmed
    Bhuta, Sapan
    Patel, Neha
    Sajdeya, Omar
    Mhanna, Mohammed
    Ghazaleh, Sami
    Beran, Azizullah
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 77 (18) : 616 - 616
  • [23] Effect of a Single Subcutaneous Infusion of Furosemide Compared with Intravenous Bolus on Vital Signs in Patients with Heart Failure
    Mohr, John
    Myers, Rene
    Udelson, James E.
    Bensimhon, Daniel
    Russell, Stuart D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2018, 24 (08) : S15 - S16
  • [24] THE ROLE OF NEUROHORMONAL ACTIVATION IN THE PATHOPHYSIOLOGY AND PROGNOSIS OF PATIENTS WITH CONGESTIVE-HEART-FAILURE
    KUBO, SH
    [J]. CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE, 1993, 4 (01) : 4 - 15
  • [25] Continuous Infusion versus Intermittent Bolus Injection of Furosemide in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Ng, Ka Ting
    Velayit, Aslinah
    Khoo, Delton Kah Yeang
    Ismail, Amirah Mohd
    Mansor, Marzida
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2018, 32 (05) : 2303 - 2310
  • [26] Continuous infusion versus bolus injection of furosemide in critically ill patients. A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zangrillo, Alberto
    Cabrini, Luca
    Monti, Giacomo
    Stefano, Turi
    Moizo, Elena
    Vinciguerra, Federico
    Frau, Giovanna
    Biondi-Zoccai, Giuseppe G.
    [J]. SIGNA VITAE, 2011, 6 (02) : 58 - 63
  • [27] Continuous infusion or bolus injection of loop diuretics for patients admitted for severe acute heart failure: Is one strategy better than the other?
    Caetano, Francisca
    Mota, Paula
    Almeida, Ines
    Fernandes, Andreia
    Botelho, Ana
    Marques, Antonio Leitao
    [J]. REVISTA PORTUGUESA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2015, 34 (02) : 95 - 102
  • [28] Continuous infusion versus bolus injection of furosemide in pediatric patients after cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized studies
    Zangrillo, Alberto
    Cabrini, Luca
    Biondi-Zoccai, Giuseppe G. L.
    Monti, Giacomo
    Turi, Stefano
    Sheiban, Imad
    Bignami, Elena
    Landoni, Giovanni
    [J]. SIGNA VITAE, 2012, 7 (01) : 17 - 22
  • [29] The effect of dobutamine on neurohormonal and cytokine profiles in patients with decompensated congestive heart failure
    Aronson, D
    Burger, AJ
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2001, 22 : 397 - 397
  • [30] INTERMITTENT ADMINISTRATION OF FUROSEMIDE VS CONTINUOUS INFUSION PRECEDED BY A LOADING DOSE FOR CONGESTIVE-HEART-FAILURE
    LAHAV, M
    REGEV, A
    RAANANI, P
    THEODOR, E
    [J]. CHEST, 1992, 102 (03) : 725 - 731