Identifying the landscape of developmental toxicity new approach methodologies

被引:6
|
作者
Becker, Richard A. [1 ]
Bianchi, Enrica [2 ]
LaRocca, Jessica [2 ]
Marty, Mary Sue [3 ]
Mehta, Vatsal [4 ]
机构
[1] Amer Chem Council, 700 Second St, Washington, DE 20002 USA
[2] Corteva Agrisci, Indianapolis, IN USA
[3] Dow Chem Co USA, Midland, MI 48674 USA
[4] Procter &Gamble Co, Mason, OH USA
来源
BIRTH DEFECTS RESEARCH | 2022年 / 114卷 / 17期
关键词
developmental toxicity; literature review; new approach methods; scoping report; Tableau; visualization; ZEBRAFISH EMBRYOS; CHEMICALS; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1002/bdr2.2075
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: The dynamics and complexities of in utero fetal development create significant challenges in transitioning from lab animal-centric developmental toxicity testing methods to assessment strategies based on new approach methodologies (NAMs). Nevertheless, considerable progress is being made, stimulated by increased research investments and scientific advances, such as induced pluripotent stem cell-derived models. To help identify developmental toxicity NAMs for toxicity screening and potential funding through the American Chemistry Council's Long-Range Research Initiative, a systematic literature review was conducted to better understand the current landscape of developmental toxicity NAMs. Methods: Scoping review tools were used to systematically survey the literature (2010-2021; similar to 18,000 references identified), results and metadata were then extracted, and a user-friendly interactive dashboard was created. Results: The data visualization dashboard, developed using Tableau (R) software, is provided as a free, open-access web tool. This dashboard enables straightforward interactive queries and visualizations to identify trends and to distinguish and understand areas or NAMs where research has been most, or least focused. Conclusions: Herein, we describe the approach and methods used, summarize the benefits and challenges of applying the systematic-review techniques, and highlight the types of questions and answers for which the dashboard can be used to explore the many different facets of developmental toxicity NAMs.
引用
收藏
页码:1123 / 1137
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluating In Silico and In Vitro Approaches for Identifying Developmental and Reproductive Toxicity in the Workplace
    Lewandowski, T.
    Shubin, S. Pacheco
    Mohar, I.
    Cohen, J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY, 2018, 37 (01) : 83 - 84
  • [32] EXPLORATION OF METHODOLOGIES FOR LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT. Approach to an own methodology design
    Aponte-Garcia, Gloria
    Maria Escobar-Ocampo, Lina
    Augusto Molina-Saldarriaga, Cesar
    [J]. BITACORA URBANO TERRITORIAL, 2018, 28 (01): : 43 - 58
  • [33] New Approach Methodologies for assessing repeated-dose systemic toxicity: an outlook on progress made, gaps and challenges
    Ouedraogo, G.
    Detroyer, A.
    Riu, A.
    Gregoire, S.
    Gautier, F.
    Noel-Voisin, A.
    Bury, D.
    [J]. TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2023, 384 : S258 - S259
  • [34] IDENTIFYING TOXICANTS - NETACS TOXICITY-BASED APPROACH
    BURKHARD, LP
    ANKLEY, GT
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1989, 23 (12) : 1438 - 1443
  • [35] Comparison of resource classification methodologies with a new approach
    Arik, A
    [J]. APPLICATION OF COMPUTERS AND OPERATIONS RESEARCH IN THE MINERAL INDUSTRY, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 57 - 64
  • [36] New Approach Methodologies in Immunotoxicology: Challenges and Opportunities
    Maddalon, Ambra
    Iulini, Martina
    Melzi, Gloria
    Corsini, Emanuela
    Galbiati, Valentina
    [J]. ENDOCRINE METABOLIC & IMMUNE DISORDERS-DRUG TARGETS, 2023, 23 (14) : 1681 - 1698
  • [37] New approach methodologies to evaluate botanical safety
    Embry, M.
    Mitchell, C.
    [J]. TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2022, 368 : S227 - S228
  • [38] NEW METHODOLOGIES IN ENGINEERING TEACHING: A MULTIDISCIPLINARY APPROACH
    Oliveira, N. M. F.
    Urbina, L.
    Souza, W. C., Jr.
    Pinto, T.
    [J]. 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION (ICERI2017), 2017, : 8584 - 8589
  • [39] A Different Approach to Validating Screening Assays for Developmental Toxicity
    Daston, George P.
    Chapin, Robert E.
    Scialli, Anthony R.
    Piersma, Aldert H.
    Carney, Edward W.
    Rogers, John M.
    Friedman, Jan M.
    [J]. BIRTH DEFECTS RESEARCH PART B-DEVELOPMENTAL AND REPRODUCTIVE TOXICOLOGY, 2010, 89 (06) : 526 - 530
  • [40] A PRACTICAL APPROACH FOR IMPROVING THE PREDICTABILITY OF RISK FOR DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICITY
    KIMMEL, CA
    [J]. TERATOLOGY, 1981, 23 (02) : A46 - A46