Food limitation explains most clutch size variation in the Nazca booby

被引:63
|
作者
Clifford, LD [1 ]
Anderson, DJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Wake Forest Univ, Dept Biol, Reynolda Stn, Winston Salem, NC 27109 USA
关键词
egg production; egg size; nutrient availability; Sula granti; supplemental feeding;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2656.2001.00521.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
1. Natural selection is expected to optimize clutch size, but intrapopulation variation is maintained in many bird species. The Nazca booby provides a simple system in which to investigate clutch size evolution because clutch size and brood size are decoupled due to obligate siblicide. The indirect effect of brood size on clutch size evolution can therefore be eliminated. 2. In Nazca boobies, second eggs provide insurance against the failure of the first egg or early death of the first hatchling, but approximately half of all females lay only one egg. We tested the hypothesis that one-egg clutches result from food limitation by providing female Nazca boobies with supplemental food. 3. A higher proportion of supplemented females produced two-egg clutches than did control females. Supplemented females produced larger second-laid eggs than did control females, but not first-laid eggs. Laying date and laying interval were not affected. 4. Comparisons of clutch size and egg volume between years indicated that the supplemental feeding experiment was not conducted in a year with a poor natural food supply. Thus supplemented females produced larger clutch sizes despite apparently normal natural food levels. 5. This experiment nearly completes our understanding of clutch size variation in the Nazca booby, and indicates that food limitation and the costs of egg-laying should be considered carefully in studies of clutch size evolution.
引用
收藏
页码:539 / 545
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Latitudinal variation in clutch size-lay date regressions in Tachycineta swallows: effects of food supply or demography?
    Winkler, David W.
    Ringelman, Kevin M.
    Dunn, Peter O.
    Whittingham, Linda
    Hussell, David J. T.
    Clark, Robert G.
    Dawson, Russell D.
    Johnson, L. Scott
    Rose, Alexandra
    Austin, Suzanne H.
    Robinson, W. Douglas
    Lombardo, Michael P.
    Thorpe, Patrick A.
    Shutler, Dave
    Robertson, Raleigh J.
    Stager, Maria
    Leonard, Marty
    Horn, Andrew G.
    Dickinson, Janis
    Ferretti, Valentina
    Massoni, Viviana
    Bulit, Florencia
    Reboreda, Juan C.
    Liljesthroem, Marcela
    Quiroga, Martin
    Rakhimberdiev, Eldar
    Ardia, Daniel R.
    ECOGRAPHY, 2014, 37 (07) : 670 - 678
  • [32] EFFECT OF ENERGY INPUT ON VARIATION IN CLUTCH SIZE AND OFFSPRING SIZE IN A VIVIPAROUS REPTILE
    SEIGEL, RA
    FORD, NB
    FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, 1992, 6 (04) : 382 - 385
  • [33] Seasonal and interannual components of intrapopulation variation in clutch size and egg size of a darter
    Heins, DC
    Baker, JA
    Guill, JM
    ECOLOGY OF FRESHWATER FISH, 2004, 13 (04) : 258 - 265
  • [34] BETWEEN AND WITHIN CLUTCH VARIATION OF EGG SIZE IN GREATER RHEAS
    Fernandez, Gustavo J.
    Reboreda, Juan C.
    WILSON JOURNAL OF ORNITHOLOGY, 2008, 120 (04): : 674 - 682
  • [35] CLUTCH SIZE VARIATION AND PATTERNS OF ATTRITION IN FECUNDITY OF WILLOW PTARMIGAN
    MARTIN, K
    HANNON, SJ
    ROCKWELL, RF
    ECOLOGY, 1989, 70 (06) : 1788 - 1799
  • [36] The Worldwide Variation in Avian Clutch Size across Species and Space
    Jetz, Walter
    Sekercioglu, Cagan H.
    Boehning-Gaese, Katrin
    PLOS BIOLOGY, 2008, 6 (12) : 2650 - 2657
  • [37] ATRESIA AS A SOURCE OF VARIATION IN CLUTCH SIZE IN SCELOPORUS-MUCRONATUS
    CUMMINS, CP
    FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, 1995, 9 (02) : 351 - 353
  • [38] Geographic variation in clutch size and a realized benefit of aggregative feeding
    Fordyce, JA
    Nice, CC
    EVOLUTION, 2004, 58 (02) : 447 - 450
  • [39] Patterns of egg and clutch size variation in the Montagu's Harrier
    Arroyo, B
    Leroux, A
    Bretagnolle, V
    JOURNAL OF RAPTOR RESEARCH, 1998, 32 (02) : 136 - 142
  • [40] CLUTCH SIZE VARIATION IN PASSERINE BIRDS - THE NEST PREDATION HYPOTHESIS
    SLAGSVOLD, T
    OECOLOGIA, 1982, 54 (02) : 159 - 169