Federal funding of endoscopic research in the United States: 1972-2002

被引:4
|
作者
Wallace, MB
Hurlstone, P
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Jacksonville, FL USA
[2] Royal Hallamshire Hosp, Gastrointestinal & Liver Unit, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0016-5107(03)02353-8
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Funding for research is critical to the determination of appropriate applications for endoscopy in clinical practice. We sought to evaluate trends in funding provided by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) for endoscopic research from 1972 through 2002. Methods: The NIH database of funded biomedical projects for the years 1972 through 2002 was searched using the Computerized Retrieval of Information on Scientific Projects (CRISP) and the keyword "endoscopy." Grants were included if a start date, title, and/or specific aims were available. Grants were classified as primary endoscopy if the title or specific aim had an endoscopy focus. Endoscopy funding was compared with other nonendoscopic funding for the same period. Results: From 1972 through 2002, 133 endoscopy-related grant applications were funded and 98 met inclusion criteria. Funding for endoscopic research increased from one grant (1972-1982) to 4 grants (1983-1992) to 93 grants (1993-2002), a 2325% increase for the 1993-2002 decade alone. Despite this increase, there were substantially fewer funded endoscopy-related applications compared with liver disease (61,804 grants), Helicobacter pylori (866 grants), and cardiac catheterization (1547 grants). Among endoscopic grants, colorectal cancer projects accounted for the largest portion (34%), followed by advanced optical technologies (18%) and Barrett's esophagus(17%). Conclusions: Funding for endoscopic research by the NIH has increased dramatically over the past 30 years, but it still lags behind funding in other fields. Projects focused on colorectal cancer, Barrett's esophagus, and optical technologies were most common among those funded, and the National Cancer Institute was the primary source of funding.
引用
收藏
页码:831 / 835
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] What justifies the United States ban on federal funding for nonreproductive cloning?
    Thomas V. Cunningham
    [J]. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 2013, 16 : 825 - 841
  • [32] Grant opportunities in the United States: funding for oncology research
    King, J. C.
    [J]. EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2009, 7 (02): : 83 - 83
  • [33] Public funding for Alzheimer disease research in the United States
    Richard J Hodes
    [J]. Nature Medicine, 2006, 12 : 770 - 773
  • [34] Research Funding at Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine in the United States
    Suminski, Richard R.
    May, Linda E.
    Guillory, V. James
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC ASSOCIATION, 2012, 112 (10): : 665 - 672
  • [35] Public funding for Alzheimer disease research in the United States
    Hodes, Richard J.
    [J]. NATURE MEDICINE, 2006, 12 (07) : 770 - 773
  • [36] Competitive grants and the funding of agricultural research in the United States
    Rubenstein, KD
    Heisey, PW
    Klotz-Ingram, C
    Frisvold, GB
    [J]. REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2003, 25 (02): : 352 - 368
  • [37] UNITED-STATES FUNDING OF TROPICAL DISEASE RESEARCH
    不详
    [J]. LANCET, 1985, 2 (8466): : 1256 - 1256
  • [38] The funding of academic research: The United States as a problematic model
    Feller, I
    [J]. TOWARDS AN AGENDA FOR AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH IN EUROPE, 2000, : 47 - 52
  • [39] Spatial and temporal changes in forest cover in Turkey's Artvin Forest, 1972-2002
    Keles, S.
    Sivrikaya, F.
    Cakir, G.
    Baskent, E. Z.
    Kose, S.
    [J]. POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2008, 17 (04): : 491 - 501
  • [40] 《日本文化在中国的传播与影响1972-2002》出版
    艾中华
    [J]. 当代亚太, 2004, (09) : 62 - 62