Approximate weighting method for multiattribute decision problems with imprecise parameters

被引:19
|
作者
Ahn, Byeong Seok [1 ]
机构
[1] Chung Ang Univ, Coll Business & Econ, 221 Heukseok, Seoul 156756, South Korea
关键词
Multiattribute decision analysis; Incomplete information; Extreme points; and Approximate weights; LINEAR PARTIAL INFORMATION; INCOMPLETE INFORMATION; ESTABLISHING DOMINANCE; PRIORITY DERIVATION; ATTRIBUTE WEIGHTS; CRITERIA; PREFERENCE; RANKING; ALTERNATIVES; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.omega.2016.11.006
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
A multiattribute decision problem with imprecise parameters refers to one in which at least one of the parameters such as attribute weights and value scores is not represented by precise numerical values. Some well-known types of incomplete attribute weights are chosen and analyzed to find their extreme points. In doing so, we show that their coefficients matrix, by itself or by the change of variables, belongs to a class of M-matrix which enables us to find its extreme points readily due to the inverse-positive property. The knowledge of extreme points not only helps us to prioritize alternatives but also supports iterative exploration of decision-maker's preference by investigating modified extreme points caused by additional preference information. A wide range of eligible attribute weights, however, often fail to result in the best alternative or a complete ranking of alternatives. To address this situation, we consider an approximate weighting method, so called the minimizing squared deviations from extreme points (MSD) which locates the attribute weights at the barycenter of a weight set. Accordingly, the MSD approach extends the rank order centroid (ROC) weighting method which is known to outperform other approximate weighting methods in case of ranked attribute weights. The evidence of the MSD's superiority over a linear program-based weighting method is verified via simulation analysis under different forms of incomplete attribute weights. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 95
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] SENSITIVITY OF MULTIATTRIBUTE DECISION-MODELS TO ALTERNATIVE SPECIFICATIONS OF WEIGHTING PARAMETERS
    ASHTON, RH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 1980, 8 (03) : 341 - 359
  • [2] The weighting method's impact on the weighting process in decision making problems
    Tzioutziou, A.
    Xenidis, Y.
    [J]. SAFETY AND RELIABILITY - SAFE SOCIETIES IN A CHANGING WORLD, 2018, : 373 - 380
  • [3] IMP: A decision aid for multiattribute evaluation using imprecise weight estimates
    Jessop, Alan
    [J]. OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2014, 49 : 18 - 29
  • [4] Decision making with imprecise parameters
    Celikyilmaz, Asli
    Turksen, I. Burhan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 2010, 51 (08) : 869 - 882
  • [5] A decision support system for multiattribute utility evaluation based on imprecise assignments
    Jiménez, A
    Ríos-Insua, S
    Mateos, A
    [J]. DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2003, 36 (01) : 65 - 79
  • [6] A lexicographical compromise method for multiple criteria group decision problems with imprecise information
    Contreras, I.
    Marmol, A. M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2007, 181 (03) : 1530 - 1539
  • [7] A weighting method for approximate nonlinear system identification
    Enqvist, Martin
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 46TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL, VOLS 1-14, 2007, : 4149 - 4154
  • [8] Partially observable Markov decision processes with imprecise parameters
    Itoh, Hideaki
    Nakamura, Kiyohiko
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2007, 171 (8-9) : 453 - 490
  • [9] A New Method for Intuitionistic Fuzzy Multiattribute Decision Making
    Gupta, Pankaj
    Lin, Chin-Teng
    Mehlawat, Mukesh Kumar
    Grover, Nishtha
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN CYBERNETICS-SYSTEMS, 2016, 46 (09): : 1167 - 1179
  • [10] A METHOD OF MULTIATTRIBUTE DECISION-MAKING WITH INCOMPLETE INFORMATION
    WEBER, M
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1985, 31 (11) : 1365 - 1371