The weighting method's impact on the weighting process in decision making problems

被引:0
|
作者
Tzioutziou, A. [1 ]
Xenidis, Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Dept Civil Engn, Thessaloniki, Greece
关键词
INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; RISK-AVERSION; AMBIGUITY; AGGREGATION; PERFORMANCE; CONSENSUS; ATTITUDE; MODEL;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Assigning values to weights in a multi-criteria decision making problem is critical, since it introduces the decision maker's perception and preference over the importance and value of the decision problem's criteria and alternatives, respectively. This paper investigates theoretically and experimentally the impact of the applied weighting method on the decision maker's determination of weights. The research develops a methodology to evaluate the impact that a weighting method may have on the decision maker's attitude concerning the assignment of weighting values, comprising; a) a psychometric test revealing the decision maker's attitude against risk and ambiguity with a new modeling approach based on a psychometric function and b) an assignment of weighting values by the decision maker with different weighting methods. The results demonstrate that the expression and particularly the ranking of decision maker's attitudinal preference are affected by the weighting method and this impact is measurable through the proposed methodology.
引用
收藏
页码:373 / 380
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Impact of Weighting Methods and Behavioral Attitudes on the Weighting Process in Decision-Making
    Tzioutziou, Anastasia
    Xenidis, Yiannis
    [J]. ASCE-ASME JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY IN ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PART B-MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 6 (01):
  • [2] Weighting on waiting: Willpower and attribute weighting models of decision making
    Harris, Alison
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 2020, 44
  • [3] CRITERION WEIGHTING IN MULTICRITERIA DECISION MAKING
    Ozturk, Derya
    Batuk, Fatmagul
    [J]. SIGMA JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND NATURAL SCIENCES-SIGMA MUHENDISLIK VE FEN BILIMLERI DERGISI, 2007, 25 (01): : 86 - 98
  • [4] UNIT WEIGHTING SCHEMES FOR DECISION MAKING
    EINHORN, HJ
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 1975, 13 (02): : 171 - 192
  • [5] Approximate weighting method for multiattribute decision problems with imprecise parameters
    Ahn, Byeong Seok
    [J]. OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2017, 72 : 87 - 95
  • [6] Weighting individual opinions in group decision making
    Garcia-Lapresta, Jose Luis
    [J]. MODELING DECISIONS FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, 4617 : 92 - +
  • [7] Weighting waiting in collective decision-making
    Robert Planqué
    Anna Dornhaus
    Nigel R. Franks
    Tim Kovacs
    James A. R. Marshall
    [J]. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2007, 61 : 347 - 356
  • [8] Weighting waiting in collective decision-making
    Planque, Robert
    Dornhaus, Anna
    Franks, Nigel R.
    Kovacs, Tim
    Marshall, James A. R.
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 2007, 61 (03) : 347 - 356
  • [9] Using the entropy weighting scheme in military decision making
    Fox, William P.
    Spence, Gregory
    Kitchen, Reed
    Powell, Steven
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DEFENSE MODELING AND SIMULATION-APPLICATIONS METHODOLOGY TECHNOLOGY-JDMS, 2020, 17 (04): : 409 - 418
  • [10] Aggregating and Weighting Expert Knowledge in Group Decision Making
    Jongsawat, Nipat
    Premchaiswadi, Wichian
    [J]. ADVANCED INTELLIGENT COMPUTING THEORIES AND APPLICATIONS, 2010, 93 : 138 - 146