Critical barriers for software process improvement implementation: An empirical study

被引:0
|
作者
Niazi, M [1 ]
Wilson, D [1 ]
Zowghi, D [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Technol Sydney, Fac Informat Technol, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
关键词
software process improvement; empirical study; software engineering; critical barriers;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
In this paper we present findings from our recent empirical study of software process improvement (SPI) implementation critical barriers (CBs) in twenty-six Australian software companies. The objective of this study is to summarise the issues that play a negative role in the implementation of SPI programmes and to identify the key barriers. Through our empirical study we identified 5 barriers (organizational politics, lack of support, lack of formal methodology, lack of awareness and lack of resources) that are generally considered critical in undermining the SPI implementation process. We also report on a literature survey that identified 6 barriers (lack of resources, inexperienced staff/lack of knowledge, time pressure, organizational politics, SPI gets in the way of real work and staff turnover). We compared our empirical study results with the literature and confirmed the barriers identified by literature and also identified two new CBs lack of SPI awareness and lack of formal methodology which were not identified in the literature. Finally, we analysed CBs identified by different groups of practitioners and found the level of agreement across all practitioners about CBs that undermine SPI implementation. Our results also provide advice to SPI managers and practitioner on what critical barriers to address when developing SPI implementation strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:389 / 395
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Systematic literature review and empirical investigation of barriers to process improvement in global software development: Client-vendor perspective
    Khan, Arif Ali
    Keung, Jacky
    Niazi, Mahmood
    Hussain, Shahid
    Ahmad, Awais
    [J]. INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 87 : 180 - 205
  • [42] Systematic review of success factors and barriers for software process improvement in global software development
    Khan, Arif Ali
    Keung, Jacky
    [J]. IET SOFTWARE, 2016, 10 (05) : 125 - 135
  • [43] Barriers to Innovation in the Implementation of the Investment Strategy: an Empirical Study
    Plotnikova, Inna
    Korneva, Olga
    Ustuizhanina, Anna
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH PARADIGMS TRANSFORMATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCES 2014 (RPTSS-2014), 2015, 166 : 369 - 377
  • [44] Software Process Improvement Implementation Risks: A Qualitative Study Based on Software Development Maturity Models Implementations in Brazil
    Dutra, Eliezer
    Santos, Gleison
    [J]. PRODUCT-FOCUSED SOFTWARE PROCESS IMPROVEMENT, PROFES 2015, 2015, 9459 : 43 - 60
  • [45] Design and Implementation of Training Course for Software Process Improvement Engineers
    Kuno, Noriyoshi
    Nakajima, Tsuyoshi
    [J]. 2016 23RD ASIA-PACIFIC SOFTWARE ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (APSEC 2016), 2016, : 381 - 384
  • [47] Applying Grounded Theory to Understand Software Process Improvement Implementation
    Montoni, Mariano Angel
    Rocha, Ana Regina
    [J]. QUATIC 2010: SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THE QUALITY OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY, 2010, : 25 - 34
  • [48] Investigating the software fault profile of industrial projects to determine process improvement areas: An empirical study
    Borretzen, Jon Arvid
    Dyre-Hansen, Jostein
    [J]. SOFTWARE PROCESS IMPROVEMENT, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, 4764 : 212 - +
  • [49] Modelling software process variability: an empirical study
    Martinez-Ruiz, T.
    Garcia, F.
    Piattini, M.
    Muench, J.
    [J]. IET SOFTWARE, 2011, 5 (02) : 172 - 187
  • [50] Maintainability of software process models:: An empirical study
    García, F
    Piattini, M
    Ruiz, F
    Visaggio, CA
    [J]. NINTH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE AND REENGINEERING, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, : 246 - 255