Valuing the effect of land use change on landscape services on the urban-rural fringe

被引:6
|
作者
Zhou, Ting [1 ]
Kennedy, Erin [2 ]
Koomen, Eric [1 ]
van Leeuwen, Eveline S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Spatial Econ, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Consulting Div, Metab, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Wageningen Univ, Urban Econ Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
landscape services; economic valuation; land-use change; urban-rural fringe; the Netherlands; OF-THE-ART; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; CONTINGENT VALUATION; BENEFIT TRANSFER; DECISION-MAKING; COVER CHANGES; IMPACT; SOIL; CONTROVERSIES; OPPORTUNITIES;
D O I
10.1080/09640568.2020.1726732
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The urban-rural fringe is a dynamic environment where urban expansion limits the provision of landscape services. Economic valuation of these services is proposed to quantify the impact of urbanisation and inform planners of the potential losses that attribute to these land-use changes. However, most evaluation methods remain controversial regarding shortcomings in providing reliable results. This study applies market price, contingent valuation and value transfer methods and compares their performance in assessing the economic impact of land-use changes on the urban-rural fringe of the Amstelland (the Netherlands). Results with these applied methods differ greatly due to their respective advantages in revealing use values or non-use values of landscape services and dependence on land-use change. Thus, results are sensitive to value types, the scarcity of landscape services, scale of the study area, and involved stakeholders. This paper reflects on the strengths and weaknesses of these methods in different planning contexts.
引用
收藏
页码:2425 / 2445
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Economic analysis of the land using efficiency about urban-rural fringe - A case of Guangzhou city
    Pang, YS
    Chen, JY
    [J]. ORIENT ACADEMIC FORUM SPECIAL, 2004, : 67 - 75
  • [42] Integrating land development size, pattern, and density to identify urban-rural fringe in a metropolitan region
    Peng, Jian
    Liu, Qinghua
    Blaschke, Thomas
    Zhang, Zimo
    Liu, Yanxu
    Hu, Yi'na
    Wang, Man
    Xu, Zihan
    Wu, Jiansheng
    [J]. LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2020, 35 (09) : 2045 - 2059
  • [43] Space use by resident and transient coyotes in an urban-rural landscape mosaic
    Mitchell, Numi
    Strohbach, Michael W.
    Pratt, Ralph
    Finn, Wendy C.
    Strauss, Eric G.
    [J]. WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 2015, 42 (06) : 461 - 469
  • [44] Land-use change in the 'edgelands': Policies and pressures in London's rural-urban fringe
    Gant, Robert L.
    Robinson, Guy M.
    Fazal, Shahab
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2011, 28 (01) : 266 - 279
  • [45] The effect of urban-rural construction land transition on ecosystem services: A theoretical framework and empirical evidence for China
    Xing, Lu
    Hu, Mingsheng
    Xue, Minggao
    [J]. HABITAT INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 124
  • [46] URBAN-RURAL CLASS CONFLICT IN OREGON LAND-USE PLANNING
    MEDLER, J
    MUSHKATEL, A
    [J]. WESTERN POLITICAL QUARTERLY, 1979, 32 (03): : 338 - 349
  • [47] Different responses of bees and hoverflies to land use in an urban-rural gradient show the importance of the nature of the rural land use
    Verboven, Hans A. F.
    Uyttenbroeck, Roel
    Brys, Rein
    Hermy, Martin
    [J]. LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2014, 126 : 31 - 41
  • [48] Urban-rural integrated development and land use transitions: A perspective of land system science
    Long, Hualou
    Chen, Kunqiu
    [J]. Dili Xuebao/Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76 (02): : 295 - 309
  • [49] Peri-Urban China: Land Use, Growth, and Integrated Urban-Rural Development
    Verdini, Giulio
    [J]. CHINA INFORMATION, 2020, 34 (02) : 301 - 302
  • [50] A comparative analysis of urban and rural construction land use change and driving forces: Implications for urban-rural coordination development in Wuhan, Central China
    Liu, Yaolin
    Luo, Ti
    Liu, Zhongqiu
    Kong, Xuesong
    Li, Jiwei
    Tan, Ronghui
    [J]. HABITAT INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 47 : 113 - 125