A Simple Mantel-Haenszel Type Test for Noninferiority

被引:2
|
作者
Koti, Kallappa M. [1 ]
机构
[1] US FDA, 4300 Montgomery Rd, Little Rock, AR 72223 USA
来源
关键词
2 x 2 contingency tables; Dichotomous response; Good outcome; Historical data; Hypergeometric distribution; W-square test; SAMPLE-SIZE; EQUIVALENCE; TRIALS; POWER;
D O I
10.1080/19466315.2020.1736140
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Randomized clinical trials designed to establish noninferiority of an experimental therapy as compared to a standard (active-control) therapy as measured by binomial proportions are being widely used. Randomization is often stratified by prognostic factors. We propose a Mantel-Haenszel (MH) type test to demonstrate noninferiority in terms of the differences in success proportions and when the noninferiority margin is not necessarily uniform in all strata. It is assumed that the efficacy of the active control is documented in at least one earlier placebo-controlled trial. Derivation of the new test originates from Wittes and Wallenstein, who have discussed asymptotic unconditional power and sample size for the MH test. We provide an easy to calculate formula for sample size. We call the new test as W-square test. It may be an alternative to the one proposed by Yanagawa et al. Yanagawa's Neriproct suppository data are analyzed using the W-square test. A SAS code that calculates the p-value is provided.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 118
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] ASSESSING OCCUPATIONALLY REDUCED FERTILITY WITH THE MANTEL-HAENSZEL METHOD
    DALCORSO, R
    LEVINE, R
    STARR, T
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1982, 116 (03) : 574 - 574
  • [42] Type I Error Inflation in DIF Identification With Mantel-Haenszel: An Explanation and a Solution
    Magis, David
    De Boeck, Paul
    EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2014, 74 (04) : 713 - 728
  • [43] Stratification for Confounding - Part 1: The Mantel-Haenszel Formula
    Tripepi, Giovanni
    Jager, Kitty J.
    Dekker, Friedo W.
    Zoccali, Carmine
    NEPHRON CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2010, 116 (04): : C317 - C321
  • [44] Applying the Mantel-Haenszel procedure to complex samples of items
    Allen, NL
    Donoghue, JR
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT, 1996, 33 (02) : 231 - 251
  • [45] ON THE VARIANCE ESTIMATOR FOR THE MANTEL-HAENSZEL RISK DIFFERENCE - REPLY
    GREENLAND, S
    ROBINS, JM
    BIOMETRICS, 1989, 45 (04) : 1324 - 1324
  • [46] STRATIFIED OR MULTICENTER ANALYSIS WITH EXTENDED MANTEL-HAENSZEL STATISTICS
    SCHINDEL, F
    KWASNY, H
    BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 1991, 33 (06) : 755 - 762
  • [48] APPLICATIONS OF MANTEL-HAENSZEL STATISTIC TO COMPARISON OF SURVIVAL DISTRIBUTIONS
    MUENZ, LR
    GREEN, SB
    BYAR, DP
    BIOMETRICS, 1977, 33 (04) : 617 - 626
  • [49] An empirical Bayes approach to Mantel-Haenszel DIF analysis
    Zwick, R
    Thayer, DT
    Lewis, C
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT, 1999, 36 (01) : 1 - 28
  • [50] Some Mantel-Haenszel tests of Rasch model assumptions
    Verguts, T
    De Boeck, P
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL & STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 54 : 21 - 37