Life cycle assessment of conventional and two-stage advanced energy-from-waste technologies for municipal solid waste treatment

被引:87
|
作者
Evangelisti, Sara [1 ]
Tagliaferri, Carla [1 ,2 ]
Clift, Roland [3 ]
Lettieri, Paola [1 ]
Taylor, Richard [2 ]
Chapman, Chris [2 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Dept Chem Engn, London WC1E 7JE, England
[2] APP, Unit B2, Swindon SN3 4DE, Wilts, England
[3] Univ Surrey, Ctr Environm Strategy, Guildford GU2 7XH, Surrey, England
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Gasification; Pyrolysis; Combustion; Energy-from-waste technology; THERMAL-TREATMENT; GASIFICATION; MANAGEMENT; RECOVERY; CARBON; INCINERATION; STRATEGIES; CONVERSION; FUELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.062
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The EU landfill and Waste Framework directives are driving new approaches to waste management in the UK, away from landfilling and mass-burn incineration, which has been regarded as the main alternative to landfilling. The objective of this study is to compare the environmental impacts of three dual-stage advanced energy-from-waste technologies, i.e. gasification and plasma gas cleaning, fast pyrolysis and combustion and gasification with syngas combustion, with those associated with conventional treatments for municipal solid waste, i.e. landfill with electricity production and incineration with electricity production. Results show that the two-stage gasification and plasma process has a significantly better overall environmental performance than the conventional waste treatment technologies and somewhat better than a more modern incineration plant, exemplified by a plant under commissioning in Lincolnshire in the UK. The benefits of the gasification and plasma process arise primarily from its higher net electrical efficiency. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:212 / 223
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Modular life cycle assessment of municipal solid waste management
    Haupt, M.
    Kagi, T.
    Hellweg, S.
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2018, 79 : 815 - 827
  • [22] Life-cycle assessment of municipal solid waste management
    Mali, Sandip T.
    Patil, Swapnali S.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-WASTE AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, 2016, 169 (04) : 181 - 190
  • [23] Life cycle assessment and life cycle costing of advanced anaerobic digestion of organic fraction municipal solid waste
    Demichelis, F.
    Tommasi, T.
    Deorsola, F. A.
    Marchisio, D.
    Mancini, G.
    Fino, D.
    [J]. CHEMOSPHERE, 2022, 289
  • [24] Critical review on life cycle assessment of conventional and innovative waste-to-energy technologies
    Mayer, Felix
    Bhandari, Ramchandra
    Gaeth, Stefan
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 672 : 708 - 721
  • [25] Waste to energy technologies for municipal solid waste management in Gaziantep
    Tozlu, Alperen
    Ozahi, Emrah
    Abusoglu, Aysegul
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 54 : 809 - 815
  • [26] Comparative streamlined life cycle assessment for two types of municipal solid waste incinerator
    Ning, Shu-Kuang
    Chang, Ni-Bin
    Hung, Ming-Chien
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2013, 53 : 56 - 66
  • [27] Life cycle assessment of the integration of anaerobic digestion and pyrolysis for treatment of municipal solid waste
    Wang, Junqi
    Okopi, Solomon Inalegwu
    Ma, Haoxiang
    Wang, Miao
    Chen, Rui
    Tian, Wangyang
    Xu, Fuqing
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 338
  • [28] Life cycle assessment of pyrolysis–gasification as an emerging municipal solid waste treatment technology
    A. U. Zaman
    [J]. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2013, 10 : 1029 - 1038
  • [29] Life cycle assessment of municipal solid waste treatment to energy options: Case study of KARTAMANTUL region, Yogyakarta
    Gunamantha, Made
    Sarto
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2012, 41 : 277 - 284
  • [30] Life cycle management of municipal solid waste
    Weitz K.
    Barlaz M.
    Ranjithan R.
    Brill D.
    Thorneloe S.
    Ham R.
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 1999, 4 (4) : 195 - 201