Life cycle assessment of conventional and two-stage advanced energy-from-waste technologies for municipal solid waste treatment

被引:87
|
作者
Evangelisti, Sara [1 ]
Tagliaferri, Carla [1 ,2 ]
Clift, Roland [3 ]
Lettieri, Paola [1 ]
Taylor, Richard [2 ]
Chapman, Chris [2 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Dept Chem Engn, London WC1E 7JE, England
[2] APP, Unit B2, Swindon SN3 4DE, Wilts, England
[3] Univ Surrey, Ctr Environm Strategy, Guildford GU2 7XH, Surrey, England
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Gasification; Pyrolysis; Combustion; Energy-from-waste technology; THERMAL-TREATMENT; GASIFICATION; MANAGEMENT; RECOVERY; CARBON; INCINERATION; STRATEGIES; CONVERSION; FUELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.062
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The EU landfill and Waste Framework directives are driving new approaches to waste management in the UK, away from landfilling and mass-burn incineration, which has been regarded as the main alternative to landfilling. The objective of this study is to compare the environmental impacts of three dual-stage advanced energy-from-waste technologies, i.e. gasification and plasma gas cleaning, fast pyrolysis and combustion and gasification with syngas combustion, with those associated with conventional treatments for municipal solid waste, i.e. landfill with electricity production and incineration with electricity production. Results show that the two-stage gasification and plasma process has a significantly better overall environmental performance than the conventional waste treatment technologies and somewhat better than a more modern incineration plant, exemplified by a plant under commissioning in Lincolnshire in the UK. The benefits of the gasification and plasma process arise primarily from its higher net electrical efficiency. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:212 / 223
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Life cycle assessment of conventional and advanced two-stage energy-from-waste technologies for methane production
    Tagliaferri, C.
    Evangelisti, S.
    Clift, R.
    Lettieri, P.
    Chapman, C.
    Taylor, Richard
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 129 : 144 - 158
  • [2] Comparative life cycle assessment of two landfill technologies for the treatment of municipal solid waste
    Ménard, JF
    Lesage, P
    Deschênes, L
    Samson, R
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2004, 9 (06): : 371 - 378
  • [3] Comparative life cycle assessment of two landfill technologies for the treatment of municipal solid waste
    Jean-François Ménard
    Pascal Lesage
    Louise Deschênes
    Réjean Samson
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2004, 9 : 371 - 378
  • [5] Life-cycle assessment (EASEWASTE) of two municipal solid waste incineration technologies in China
    Chen, Dezhen
    Christensen, Thomas H.
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2010, 28 (06) : 508 - 519
  • [6] Environmental Assessment of Municipal Solid Waste by Two-Stage Plasma Gasification
    Ramos, Ana
    Teixeira, Carlos Afonso
    Rouboa, Abel
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2019, 12 (01)
  • [7] Life cycle assessment of waste-to-energy (WtE) technologies for electricity generation using municipal solid waste in Nigeria
    Ayodele, T. R.
    Ogunjuyigbe, A. S. O.
    Alao, M. A.
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 201 : 200 - 218
  • [8] Comparison of municipal solid waste treatment technologies from a life cycle perspective in China
    Dong, Jun
    Chi, Yong
    Zou, Daoan
    Fu, Chao
    Huang, Qunxing
    Ni, Mingjiang
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2014, 32 (01) : 13 - 23
  • [9] Comparative study of municipal solid waste treatment technologies using life cycle assessment method
    Zaman, A. U.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 7 (02) : 225 - 234
  • [10] Comparative study of municipal solid waste treatment technologies using life cycle assessment method
    A. U. Zaman
    [J]. International Journal of Environmental Science & Technology, 2010, 7 : 225 - 234