The French Society of Neonatology's Proposals for Neonatal End-of-Life Decision-Making

被引:40
|
作者
Dageville, C. [1 ]
Betremieux, P. [2 ]
Gold, F. [3 ]
Simeoni, U. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp, Div Pediat, Neonatal Intens Care Unit, Nice, France
[2] Univ Hosp, Div Pediat, Pediat & Neonatal Intens Care Unit, Rennes, France
[3] Paris 6 Univ Hosp, Div Neonatol, Paris, France
[4] Assistance Publ Hop Marseille, Div Neonatol & Espace Eth Mediterraneen, Marseille, France
[5] Univ Aix Marseille 2, Marseille, France
关键词
End-of-life decisions; French law; Life-sustaining treatment; INTENSIVE-CARE UNITS; GRONINGEN PROTOCOL; PERSPECTIVE; GUIDELINES; WITHDRAWAL; MEDICINE; INFANTS; EUTHANASIA; VIABILITY; NEWBORNS;
D O I
10.1159/000324119
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Background: Opinions and practice regarding end-of-life decisions in neonatal medicine show considerable variations between countries. A recent change of the legal framework, together with an ongoing debate among French neonatologists, led the French Society of Neonatology to reconsider and update its previous recommendations. Objectives: To propose a set of recommendations on the ethical principles to be respected in the making and application of end-of-life decisions. Methods: A multidisciplinary working group on ethical issues in perinatal medicine composed of neonatologists, obstetricians and ethicists. Results: Withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment may be acceptable, and unreasonable therapeutic obstinacy is condemned. This implies that the child's best interests must always be the central consideration. Although the parents must be involved in the decision process so that they form an alliance with the healthcare team, and a collegial approach is of utmost importance, any crucial decision affecting the patient's life calls for individual medical responsibility. Because every newborn is rightfully an integral member of a human family, his or her dignity must be preserved. The goal of palliative care is to preserve the quality of a life, also at its end. The intention underlying an act has to be analyzed perceptively. Euthanasia, i.e. to perform an act with the deliberate intention to cause or hasten a patient's death, is legally and morally forbidden. Conversely, to withhold or withdraw a life-sustaining treatment can be justified when the intention is to cease opposing, in an unreasonable manner, the natural course of a disease. Conclusions: This statement provides the principles identified by French neonatologists on which to base their decisions concerning the ending of life. Arguments are set forth, discussed and compared with international statements and previously published considerations. Copyright (C) 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:206 / 214
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] PREFERENCES FOR FAMILY INVOLVEMENT IN END-OF-LIFE DECISION-MAKING
    Harlow, Alyssa
    Green, Michael
    Levi, Benjamin
    Schubart, Jane
    Stewart, Renee R.
    Dorantes, Jorge A.
    Lehmann, Lisa S.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2015, 30 : S68 - S69
  • [32] Teaching end-of-life decision-making "Newlywed style"
    Coppola, Kristen M.
    Strohmetz, David B.
    DEATH STUDIES, 2016, 40 (03) : 147 - 153
  • [33] THE RIGHT TO EUTHANASIA: MEDIATION IN END-OF-LIFE DECISION-MAKING
    Gomez, Pilar Munuera
    Martinez-Lopez, Jose Angel
    Lozano, Esther Bodalo
    Aya, Jesus Adolfo Guilla Mon
    PRISMA SOCIAL, 2023, (43): : 262 - 282
  • [34] Adolescent attitudes about end-of-life decision-making
    Lyon, ME
    McCabe, MA
    Patel, K
    D'Angelo, LJ
    JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 2003, 32 (02) : 138 - 139
  • [35] RELIGIOUS INFLUENCE ON AVOIDING END-OF-LIFE DECISION-MAKING
    Idler, E. L.
    Garrido, M. M.
    Leventhal, H.
    Carr, D.
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2010, 50 : 365 - 365
  • [37] Nephrologists' reported preparedness for end-of-life decision-making
    Davison, Sara N.
    Jhangri, Gian S.
    Holley, Jean L.
    Moss, Alvin H.
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2006, 1 (06): : 1256 - 1262
  • [38] The enactment stage of end-of-life decision-making for children
    Sullivan, Jane Elizabeth
    Gillam, Lynn Heather
    Monagle, Paul Terence
    PALLIATIVE & SUPPORTIVE CARE, 2019, 17 (02) : 165 - 171
  • [39] European Models of Regulation of End-of-Life Decision-Making
    Milczarek, Ewa
    PRZEGLAD SEJMOWY, 2023, (05): : 209 - 224
  • [40] Tolstoy on transparency and authority in end-of-life decision-making
    Robert D. Truog
    Intensive Care Medicine, 2011, 37 : 1723 - 1724