Solving Directional Overcurrent Relays Coordination problem using Different Multi-Objective Optimization algorithms with Fuzzy Logic Decision-Making Tool

被引:0
|
作者
Korashy, Ahmed [1 ]
Kamel, Salah [2 ]
Jurado, Francisco [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Jaen, Dept Elect Engn, 23700 EPS Linares, Jaen, Spain
[2] Aswan Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Aswan 81542, Egypt
关键词
Fuzzy logic decision making; Multi-objective Grey wolf optimizer; Multi-Objective Ant Lion Optimizer; Direction overcurrent relays; Multi-objective Salp Swarm Algorithm; GSA;
D O I
10.1109/EEEIC/ICPSEUROPE54979.2022.9854641
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The most complex structure that has developed over the last decade is the network of the electrical system. Protective equipment's main function is to maintain network reliability. Directional overcurrent relays (DOCRs) are generally used in power systems. The target of coordination between DOCRs is to maintain unfaulty parts in service and isolate faulty sections only. In this paper different multi-objective techniques are presented to solve the coordination problem. The first objective function suggested decreasing the total operating time for DOCRs. The second function is suggested to minimize the delay between primary/ backup DOCRs. The feasibility of the proposed algorithms is tested using different systems.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Decision-making problem analysis for multi-objective optimization based on regret-function
    Xu, Qian
    Tang, Sheng-Jing
    Guo, Jie
    Yang, Chun-Lei
    [J]. Beijing Ligong Daxue Xuebao/Transaction of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2010, 30 (07): : 803 - 806
  • [22] A multi-objective decision-making approach to the journal submission problem
    Wong, Tony E.
    Srikrishnan, Vivek
    Hadka, David
    Keller, Klaus
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (06):
  • [23] Solving a multi-objective solid transportation problem: a comparative study of alternative methods for decision-making
    Abdelati M.H.
    Abd-El-Tawwab A.M.
    Ellimony E.E.M.
    Rabie M.
    [J]. Journal of Engineering and Applied Science, 2023, 70 (01):
  • [24] A multi-objective evolutionary algorithms with group fuzzy decision making method
    Qin, Yongfa
    Gong, Qingsong
    [J]. PROGRESS IN INTELLIGENCE COMPUTATION AND APPLICATIONS, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, : 132 - 137
  • [25] Multi-objective optimization of hydrocyclones using meta-heuristic algorithms and preference-informed decision-making
    Tan, Cong
    Hu, Hongwei
    Ye, Qing
    E, Dianyu
    Cui, Jiaxin
    Zhou, Zongyan
    Kuang, Shibo
    Zou, Ruiping
    Yu, Aibing
    [J]. POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 444
  • [26] Towards Many-Objective Optimization: Objective Analysis, Multi-Objective Optimization and Decision-Making
    Zheng, J. H.
    Kou, Y. N.
    Jing, Z. X.
    Wu, Q. H.
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 : 93742 - 93751
  • [27] An injection optimization decision-making tool using streamline based fuzzy logic workflow
    BuKhamseen, Nader Y.
    Al-Najem, Abdullah A.
    Saffar, Ali H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 12 (01) : 171 - 181
  • [28] Multi-objective optimisation of micromixer design using genetic algorithms and multi-criteria decision-making algorithms
    Cunegatto, Eduardo Henrique Taube
    Zinani, Flavia Schwarz Franceschini
    Rigo, Sandro Jose
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROMECHATRONICS, 2024, 7 (03)
  • [29] NSGA Multi-objective Optimization Algorithms and Geographic Decision-making: Principles, State of the Art, and the Future
    Gao, Peichao
    Wang, Haoyu
    Song, Changqing
    Cheng, Changxiu
    Shen, Shi
    [J]. Journal of Geo-Information Science, 2023, 25 (01) : 25 - 39
  • [30] An injection optimization decision-making tool using streamline based fuzzy logic workflow
    Nader Y. BuKhamseen
    Abdullah A. Al-Najem
    Ali H. Saffar
    [J]. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 2022, 12 : 171 - 181