Multi-criteria Decision-Making Approaches to Agricultural Land Suitability Classification of Malda District, Eastern India

被引:19
|
作者
Mistri, Prakash [1 ]
Sengupta, Somasis [2 ]
机构
[1] Kishore Bharati Bhagini Nivedita Coll Coed, Dept Geog, Kolkata 700060, India
[2] Univ Burdwan, Dept Geog, Bardhhaman 713104, India
关键词
Land suitability classification (LSC); Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM); Composite ranks; Composite Z-score; Analytical hierarchy process (AHP); Weighted principal component analysis (WPCA); Agricultural efficiency (AE); GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION-SYSTEMS; HIERARCHY PROCESS; GIS; AHP; CULTIVATION; PROVINCE; PATTERN; REGION; CROPS; WHEAT;
D O I
10.1007/s11053-019-09556-8
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Land suitability classification (LSC) is an approach of land evaluation, which measures the degree of appropriateness of land for a specific land use. LSC is governed by a myriad of factors at the local and regional level including physiographic, pedologic and a host of socioeconomic and infrastructural determinants. This has called for the application of different multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques in agricultural LSC. The present study has attempted and compared various MCDM-based agricultural LSCs for Malda District in Eastern India. The study is based on multiple parameters governing agriculture, considering not only the physiographic and pedological attributes (e.g., relief, slope, soil fertility, soil organic carbon, etc.) but also the socioeconomic ones (e.g., the percentage of people engaged in agriculture, cultivator-labor ratio, degree of electrification, etc.). Four major MCDM algorithms have been applied, i.e., composite ranks, composite Z-scores, analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and weighted principal component analysis (WPCA). The results were also compared with the crop productivity-based agricultural efficiency. It was observed that about 15.44% of the area of Malda District is highly suitable for agriculture, whereas limited suitability is displayed by about 12.68% of area. The remaining part falls under moderate and marginal suitability classes. Furthermore, WPCA and AHP are superior to the nonparametric techniques of MCDM, namely composite ranks and composite Z-score. Moreover, the results of WPCA are superior to those of AHP. Due to the inherent limitations of the AHP approach, this study proposes the use of WPCA in the domain of agricultural LSC.
引用
收藏
页码:2237 / 2256
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Land-use suitability assessment for urban development using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Analysis in the Himalayan districts of Shimla, Nainital, and Darjeeling, India
    Neeraj Suthar
    Dip Das
    Jyotirmoy Mallik
    [J]. Discover Environment, 2 (1):
  • [32] Special Issue on Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approaches
    Delibasic, Boris
    Ribeiro, Rita
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 7 (01) : IV - V
  • [33] An extension of fuzzy decision maps for multi-criteria decision-making
    Elomda, Basem Mohamed
    Hefny, Hesham Ahmed
    Hassan, Hesham Ahmed
    [J]. EGYPTIAN INFORMATICS JOURNAL, 2013, 14 (02) : 147 - 155
  • [34] Assessment of agricultural land suitability for irrigation with reclaimed water using geospatial multi-criteria decision analysis
    Paul, Manashi
    Negahban-Azar, Masoud
    Shirmohammadi, Adel
    Montas, Hubert
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2020, 231
  • [35] A land use suitability model for rainfed farming by Multi-criteria Decision-making Analysis (MCDA) and Geographic Information System (GIS)
    Kazemi, Hossein
    Akinci, Halil
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 116 : 1 - 6
  • [36] A comparison of two multi-criteria decision-making techniques
    Akhavi, F
    Hayes, C
    [J]. 2003 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN AND CYBERNETICS, VOLS 1-5, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 956 - 961
  • [37] MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING (MCDM) TECHNIQUES IN PLANNING
    MASSAM, BH
    [J]. PROGRESS IN PLANNING, 1988, 30 : 1 - &
  • [38] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making for Heterogeneous Multiprocessor Scheduling
    Saroja, S.
    Revathi, T.
    Auluck, Nitin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2018, 17 (05) : 1399 - 1427
  • [39] A comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision-making methods
    Ceballos B.
    Lamata M.T.
    Pelta D.A.
    [J]. Progress in Artificial Intelligence, 2016, 5 (4) : 315 - 322
  • [40] Modified approach to PROMETHEE for multi-criteria decision-making
    Radojicic, Miroslav
    Zizovic, Malisa
    Nesic, Zoran
    Vasovic, Jasmina Vesic
    [J]. MAEJO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 7 (03) : 408 - 421