A Mixed-Methods Protocol to Identify Best Practices for Implementing Pharmacogenetic Testing in Clinical Settings

被引:0
|
作者
Sperber, Nina R. [1 ,2 ]
Cragun, Deborah [3 ]
Roberts, Megan C. [4 ]
Bendz, Lisa M. [5 ]
Ince, Parker [1 ]
Gonzales, Sarah [1 ]
Haga, Susanne B. [6 ]
Wu, R. Ryanne [2 ,6 ]
Petry, Natasha J. [7 ]
Ramsey, Laura [8 ,9 ]
Uber, Ryley [10 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Dept Populat Hlth Sci, Durham, NC 27701 USA
[2] Durham VA Hlth Care Syst, Durham, NC 27705 USA
[3] Univ S Florida, Coll Publ Hlth, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
[4] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, UNC Eshelman Sch Pharm, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[5] Duke Univ Hosp, Dept Pharm, Ctr Medicat Policy & Drug Informat, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[6] Duke Univ, Dept Med, Durham, NC 27701 USA
[7] North Dakota State Univ, Sch Pharm, Sanford Hlth Imagenet, Fargo, ND 58108 USA
[8] Univ Cincinnati, Coll Med, Dept Pediat, Div Clin Pharmacol,Cincinnati Childrens Hosp Med, Cincinnati, OH 45229 USA
[9] Univ Cincinnati, Coll Med, Dept Pediat, Div Res Patient Serv,Cincinnati Childrens Hosp Me, Cincinnati, OH 45229 USA
[10] Geisinger, Ctr Pharm Innovat & Outcomes, Danville, PA 17822 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE | 2022年 / 12卷 / 08期
关键词
pharmacogenomics; coincidence analysis; configurational comparative methods; health services research; implementation science; mixed methods; HEALTH; MEDICINE;
D O I
10.3390/jpm12081313
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Using a patient's genetic information to inform medication prescriptions can be clinically effective; however, the practice has not been widely implemented. Health systems need guidance on how to engage with providers to improve pharmacogenetic test utilization. Approaches from the field of implementation science may shed light on the complex factors affecting pharmacogenetic test use in real-world settings and areas to target to improve utilization. This paper presents an approach to studying the application of precision medicine that utilizes mixed qualitative and quantitative methods and implementation science frameworks to understand which factors or combinations consistently account for high versus low utilization of pharmocogenetic testing. This approach involves two phases: (1) collection of qualitative and quantitative data from providers-the cases-at four clinical institutions about their experiences with, and utilization of, pharmacogenetic testing to identify salient factors; and (2) analysis using a Configurational Comparative Method (CCM), using a mathematical algorithm to identify the minimally necessary and sufficient factors that distinguish providers who have higher utilization from those with low utilization. Advantages of this approach are that it can be used for small to moderate sample sizes, and it accounts for conditions found in real-world settings by demonstrating how they coincide to affect utilization.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Implementing traumatic brain injury screening in behavioral health treatment settings: results of an explanatory sequential mixed-methods investigation
    Hyzak, Kathryn A.
    Bunger, Alicia C.
    Bogner, Jennifer
    Davis, Alan K.
    Corrigan, John D.
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2023, 18 (01)
  • [42] The feasibility of implementing the ichom standard set for hip and knee osteoarthritis: A mixed-methods evaluation in public and private hospital settings
    Ackerman I.N.
    Cavka B.
    Lippa J.
    Bucknill A.
    [J]. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 2 (1)
  • [43] Exploring the Current Landscape of Intravenous Infusion Practices and Errors (ECLIPSE): protocol for a mixed-methods observational study
    Blandford, Ann
    Furniss, Dominic
    Lyons, Imogen
    Chumbley, Gill
    Iacovides, Ioanna
    Wei, Li
    Cox, Anna
    Mayer, Astrid
    Schnock, Kumiko
    Bates, David Westfall
    Dykes, Patricia C.
    Bell, Helen
    Franklin, Bryony Dean
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (03):
  • [44] Implementing Intergenerational Best Practices in Community-Based Settings: A Preliminary Study
    Juckett, Lisa A.
    Jarrott, Shannon E.
    Naar, Jill Juris
    Scrivano, Rachel M.
    Bunger, Alicia C.
    [J]. HEALTH PROMOTION PRACTICE, 2022, 23 (03) : 473 - 481
  • [45] Protection of pregnant women at work in Switzerland: practices, obstacles and resources. A mixed-methods study protocol
    Krief, Peggy
    Zellweger, Alessia
    Mercier, Maria-Pia Politis
    Danuser, Brigitta
    Wild, Pascal
    Zenoni, Michela
    Probst, Isabelle
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (06):
  • [46] A mixed-methods study to identify effective practices in the teaching of writing in a digital learning environment in low income schools
    Jesson, Rebecca
    McNaughton, Stuart
    Rosedale, Naomi
    Zhu, Tong
    Cockle, Victoria
    [J]. COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2018, 119 : 14 - 30
  • [47] Outreach to Facilitate Return to VA Care for Veterans With Serious Mental Illness: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of Best Practices
    Abraham, Kristen M.
    Merrill, Stephanie L.
    Quasarano, Joanna G.
    Mach, Jennifer
    Harrod, Molly
    Takamine, Linda
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICES, 2022, 19 (03) : 573 - 584
  • [48] Developing a best practice framework for musculoskeletal outpatient physiotherapy delegation: the MOPeD mixed-methods research study protocol
    Sarigiovannis, Panos
    Foster, Nadine E.
    Jowett, Sue
    Saunders, Benjamin
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (03):
  • [49] Point of care HIV testing in dental settings in high-income countries: A mixed-methods systematic review
    Doughty, J.
    Tran, C.
    Santella, A. J.
    Fitzgerald, R.
    Burns, F.
    Porter, Stephen
    Watt, Richard G.
    [J]. COMMUNITY DENTISTRY AND ORAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2024, 52 (05) : 648 - 659
  • [50] Best Practices for Mixed Methods Research in the Health Sciences
    Dowding, Dawn
    [J]. QUALITATIVE SOCIAL WORK, 2013, 12 (04) : 541 - 545