The Reliability and Acceptability of RDx-Based Tele- Controlled Subjective Refraction Compared with Traditional Subjective Refraction

被引:2
|
作者
Huang, Jie [1 ,2 ]
Li, Xiaoning [3 ,5 ]
Yan, Tao [4 ]
Wen, Longbo [2 ]
Pan, Lun [2 ]
Yang, Zhikuan [1 ,2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Aier Sch Ophthalmol, Changsha, Peoples R China
[2] Hunan Prov Optometry Engn Technol Res Ctr, Changsha, Peoples R China
[3] Hubei Univ Sci & Technol, Aier Sch Optometry & Vis Sci, Xianning, Peoples R China
[4] Nanchang Aier Eye Hosp, Nanchang, Peoples R China
[5] Changsha Aier Eye Hosp, Changsha, Peoples R China
[6] Cent South Univ, Aier Sch Ophthalmol, 10th Floor,New Century Bldg,198 Furong Middle Rd, Changsha 410015, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
REPEATABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; AUTOREFRACTION; TELEMEDICINE; VARIABILITY; ABERROMETRY; AGREEMENT; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1167/tvst.11.11.16
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the reliability and acceptability of tele-controlled subjective refraction supported by RDx, a new technique that involves optical software designed for controlling phoropters remotely, to traditional subjective refraction. Methods: Sixty-five participants underwent tele-controlled subjective refraction and traditional subjective refraction randomly and nine of them underwent the second tele-controlled subjective refraction measurement on the same day. After their examinations, we distributed a validated satisfaction questionnaire to each participant. The elapsed time taken for refraction, sphere (S), cylinder (C), spherical equivalent (SE), vertical and oblique cylindrical vectors (J(0) and J(45)), and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were compared. Age and refractive error typewere included as covariates. Bland-Altman analysis was used to assess the agreement between both methods of refraction. Results: Themean age was 20.5 +/- 5.9 years for all participants (aged 9 to 40 years); 57% were female participants. The repeatability analysis of tele-controlled method showed no significant differences for all parameters (P > 0.05). We found no statistical differences (P > 0.05) between tele-controlled subjective refraction and traditional subjective refraction for all parameters in either group. The mean difference and 95% limits of agreement for SE, J0, and J45 were -0.03 +/- 0.36 diopters (D), -0.00 +/- 0.57 D, and -0.01 +/- 0.79 D, respectively. The tele-controlled method took more time to perform than the traditional one (P < 0.05). Completed questionnaires were returned by 55 participants (85%), and they showed high satisfaction and acceptance of the tele-controlled method (98%). Conclusions: Tele-controlled subjective refraction results agreed with traditional subjective refraction for all refraction components except for cylinder vectors. In addition, the broad acceptability of tele-controlled subjective refraction means practicability in clinical practice. Translation Relevance: The RDx-based tele-controlledmethod can provide an alternative to subjective refraction, especially in areas that lack experienced optometrists.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Algorithm based subjective refraction compared to conventional subjective refraction
    Benard, Yohann
    Hoffmann, Julia
    Seidemann, Anne
    Eisenbarth, Werner
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2020, 61 (07)
  • [2] Beyond traditional subjective refraction
    Rodriguez-Lopez, Victor
    Dorronsoro, Carlos
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 33 (03) : 228 - 234
  • [3] A Comparison between Automated Subjective Refraction and Traditional Subjective Refraction in Keratoconus Patients
    Carracedo, Gonzalo
    Carpena-Torres, Carlos
    Pastrana, Cristina
    Privado-Aroco, Ana
    Serramito, Maria
    Espinosa-Vidal, Teresa Maria
    Rodriguez-Lafora, Maria
    [J]. OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2021, 98 (06) : 597 - 604
  • [4] The precision of wavefront refraction compared to subjective refraction and autorefraction
    Pesudovs, Konrad
    Parker, Katrina E.
    Cheng, Han
    Applegate, Raymond A.
    [J]. OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2007, 84 (05) : 387 - 392
  • [5] A comparison between aberrometry-based automated subjective refraction and traditional subjective refraction in keratoconus patients
    Carracedo, Gonzalo
    Torres, Carlos Carpena
    Pastrana, Crisitna
    Privado, Ana
    Serramito, Maria
    Vidal, Teresa Espinosa
    Lafora, Maria Rodriguez
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2021, 62 (08)
  • [6] Efficacy of aberrometry-based binocular refraction compared with subjective refraction in keratoconus patients
    Carracedo, Gonzalo
    Carpena Torres, Carlos
    Serramito, Maria
    Privado Aroco, Ana
    Rodriguez Lafora, Maria
    Espinosa Vidal, Teresa
    Batres Valderas, Laura
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2019, 60 (09)
  • [7] Efficacy and repeatability of aberrometry-based binocular refraction compared with subjective refraction.
    Carracedo, Gonzalo
    Batres, Laura
    Serramito, Maria
    Gonzalez, Anahi
    Carpena-Torres, Carlos
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2018, 59 (09)
  • [8] Comparison Between Aberrometry-Based Binocular Refraction and Subjective Refraction
    Carracedo, Gonzalo
    Carpena-Torres, Carlos
    Serramito, Maria
    Batres-Valderas, Laura
    Gonzalez-Bergaz, Anahi
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL VISION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 7 (04):
  • [9] Agreement of wavefront-based refraction, dry and cycloplegic autorefraction with subjective refraction
    Bamdad, Shahram
    Momeni-Moghaddam, Hamed
    Abdolahian, Milad
    Pinero, David P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OPTOMETRY, 2022, 15 (01) : 100 - 106
  • [10] COMPARISON OF SMARTPHONE-BASED AND AUTOMATED REFRACTION WITH SUBJECTIVE REFRACTION FOR SCREENING OF REFRACTIVE ERRORS
    Ee, Chye Li
    Samsudin, Amir
    [J]. OPHTHALMIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2022, 29 (05) : 588 - 594