Agreement of wavefront-based refraction, dry and cycloplegic autorefraction with subjective refraction

被引:8
|
作者
Bamdad, Shahram [1 ]
Momeni-Moghaddam, Hamed [2 ,3 ]
Abdolahian, Milad [1 ]
Pinero, David P. [4 ]
机构
[1] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Poostchi Ophthalmol Res Ctr, Shiraz, Iran
[2] Zahedan Univ Med Sci, Hlth Promot Res Ctr, Zahedan, Iran
[3] Mashhad Univ Med Sci, Sch Paramed Sci, Dept Optometry, Mashhad, Razavi Khorasan, Iran
[4] Univ Alicante, Dept Opt Pharmacol & Anat, Alicante, Spain
关键词
Auto-refraction; Subjective manifest refraction; Wavefront refraction; Cycloplegic refraction; IMAGE QUALITY; OBJECTIVE REFRACTION; MANIFEST REFRACTION; HUMAN EYE; ABERRATIONS; REPEATABILITY; ACCURACY; ABERROMETRY; PRECISION; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.optom.2020.08.008
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the agreement of dry, and cycloplegic autorefraction and wavefront-based refraction with subjective refraction. Method: 83 subjects aged 19-57 years were included in this cross-sectional study. Refractive status was determined using four methods including subjective refraction, wavefront-based refraction, dry and cycloplegic autorefraction. Refractive data were recorded as sphere, cylinder and spherical equivalent (SE). Power vector components were used to compare the astigmatism obtained using the different methods of refraction. Results: The more negative spherical, cylindrical and SE components were obtained using dry autorefraction, wavefront-based refraction and dry autorefraction, respectively. The less negative spherical, cylindrical and SE components were obtained using cycloplegic autorefraction, subjective refraction and cycloplegic autorefraction, respectively. Considering the spherical component, there was a statistically significant hyperopic shift (0.12 +/- 0.29 D, p = 0.001) with cycloplegic autorefraction and a significant myopic shift (-0.17 +/- 0.32 D, p < 0.001) with dry autorefraction compared to subjective refraction, while the difference between wavefront-based and subjective refraction was not significant statistically (p =0.145). The calculated cylindrical component using subjective refraction showed statistically significant difference with dry auto-refraction (p < 0.001), cycloplegic auto-refraction (p = 0.041) and wavefront refraction (p < 0.001). The highest correlation with subjective refraction in sphere, cylinder and SE was observed for cycloplegic auto-refraction (r(s)=0.967), dry auto-refraction (r(s)=0.983) and cycloplegic auto-refraction (r(s)=0.982), respectively. Conclusions: As subjective refraction is gold standard in our study, sphere in cycloplegic autorefraction and astigmatism in dry auto-refraction showed better agreement and correlation. (C) 2020 Spanish General Council of Optometry. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U.
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 106
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Agreement and Repeatability of Noncycloplegic and Cycloplegic Wavefront-based Autorefraction in Children
    Rauscher, Franziska G.
    Lange, Heike
    Yahiaoui-Doktor, Maryam
    Tegetmeyer, Helmut
    Sterker, Ina
    Hinz, Andreas
    Wahl, Siegfried
    Wiedemann, Peter
    Ohlendorf, Arne
    Blendowske, Ralf
    [J]. OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2019, 96 (11) : 879 - 889
  • [2] Comparisons of wavefront refraction, autorefraction, and subjective manifest refraction
    Lin, Hong-Zin
    Chen, Chien-Chung
    Lee, Yuan-Chieh
    [J]. TZU CHI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 25 (01): : 43 - 46
  • [3] The precision of wavefront refraction compared to subjective refraction and autorefraction
    Pesudovs, Konrad
    Parker, Katrina E.
    Cheng, Han
    Applegate, Raymond A.
    [J]. OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2007, 84 (05) : 387 - 392
  • [4] Agreement and variability of subjective refraction, autorefraction, and wavefront aberrometry in pseudophakic patients
    Ruiss, Manuel
    Findl, Oliver
    Draschl, Petra
    Harrer-Seely, Annette
    Hirnschall, Nino
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 47 (08): : 1056 - 1063
  • [5] Cycloplegic autorefraction versus subjective refraction: the Tehran Eye Study
    Hashemi, Hassan
    Khabazkhoob, Mehdi
    Asharlous, Amir
    Soroush, Sara
    Yekta, AbbasAli
    Dadbin, Nooshin
    Fotouhi, Akbar
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 100 (08) : 1122 - 1127
  • [6] A comparison of wavefront-based objective refraction without cycloplegia against subjective refraction with cycloplegia in children
    Mueller, Jonas
    Chen, Xiaoqin
    Li, Lihua
    Ohlendorf, Arne
    Wahl, Siegfried
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2023, 64 (08)
  • [7] Autorefraction versus subjective refraction
    Brown, SM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2005, 31 (12): : 2243 - 2244
  • [8] Autorefraction versus subjective refraction - Reply
    Pesudovs, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2005, 31 (12): : 2244 - 2244
  • [9] The Pentacam® AXI, Wave provides a reliable wavefront-based objective refraction when compared to manifest subjective refraction: A prospective study
    Balparda, Kepa
    Acevedo-Urrego, Andrea
    Silva-Quintero, Laura
    Herrera-Chalarca, Tatiana
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 70 (05) : 1533 - +
  • [10] Agreement Between Autorefraction and Subjective Refraction in Keraring-Implanted Keratoconic Eyes
    Al-Tuwairqi, Waleed S.
    Ogbuehi, Kelechi C.
    Razzouk, Haya
    Alanazi, Mana A.
    Osuagwu, Uchechukwu L.
    [J]. EYE & CONTACT LENS-SCIENCE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2017, 43 (02): : 116 - 122