INTRAVITREAL BEVACIZUMAB AND/OR MACULAR PHOTOCOAGULATION AS A PRIMARY TREATMENT FOR DIFFUSE DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA

被引:42
|
作者
Solaiman, Kamal A. M. [1 ]
Diab, Mohammad M. [2 ]
Abo-Elenin, Mostafa [3 ]
机构
[1] Zagazig Univ, Fac Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Zagazig, Egypt
[2] Ain Shams Univ, Fac Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Cairo, Egypt
[3] Tanta Univ, Fac Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Tanta, Egypt
关键词
intravitreal bevacizumab; macular photocoagulation; diffuse diabetic macular edema; VEGF; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; GRID LASER PHOTOCOAGULATION; TRIAMCINOLONE ACETONIDE; VISUAL-ACUITY; AVASTIN; RETINOPATHY; OUTCOMES; RETINA; TRIAL; MG;
D O I
10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181e1ed07
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal injection of bevacizumab (IVB) followed by modified grid laser photocoagulation (MGP) versus each alone as a primary treatment of diffuse diabetic macular edema. Patients and Methods: A randomized 3-arm clinical trial in which 62 eyes of 48 patients with diffuse diabetic macular edema were enrolled. Eyes were randomly distributed to 1 of 3 study groups: 19 eyes underwent MGP (MGP group), 21 eyes received 1.25 mg of IVB (IVB group), and 22 eyes received IVB followed by MGP (combined group). All eyes underwent a complete ophthalmic examination including fluorescein angiography and optical coherence tomography at baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months, after treatment. Fluorescein angiography was performed at the 3 and 6 months follow up visits. The outcome measures were the change compared with baseline in central macular thickness (CMT), changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), changes in fluorescein angiography leakage, and any reported complication. A P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: One month after treatment, the reduction in the mean CMT versus baseline as 49.88 mu m (10.45%) in MGP group, 150.92 mu m (31.30%) in IVB group, and 110.30 mu m (23.77%) in the combined group, with a corresponding improvement in the mean BCVA. At 1 month, the improvement in CMT was better than baseline in all groups, yet only significant in the IVB group (P < 0.05) and the combined group (P < 0.05). The improvement in mean BCVA was significant in the IVB (P < 0.05) and the combined groups at 1 month (P < 0.05). At 3 months, the mean CMT was still better than baseline in all groups but this improvement was significant only in the combined group (P < 0.05). The improvement in the mean BCVA was significant only in the IVB and the combined groups (P < 0.05). Six months after treatment, the reduction in the mean CMT was significant in the combined group only (P < 0.05) and there was no significant improvement in the mean BCVA in all groups (P > 0.05). The BCVA did not deteriorate below baseline in all eyes included in the study, except three eyes in the MGP group. No complication related to the intravitreal injection was reported in the injected eyes. Conclusion: Combined therapy with IVB and sequential MGP 3 weeks later appeared to be superior to MGP or IVB alone in reducing macular thickening and improving visual acuity. However, no significant improvement in BCVA occurs 6 months after treatment. A combination of IVB and sequential MGP could be used as an initial treatment of diffuse diabetic macular edema. RETINA 30:1638-1645, 2010
引用
收藏
页码:1638 / 1645
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Macular grid photocoagulation after intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for diffuse diabetic macular edema
    Kang, SW
    Sa, HS
    Cho, HY
    Kim, JI
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2006, 124 (05) : 653 - 658
  • [12] INTRAVITREAL BEVACIZUMAB AS AN ADJUNCT TO LASER FOR DIFFUSE DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA
    Nawaz, Shah
    Shaveta
    Sofi, Ishfaq Ahmad
    Querishi, Tariq
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2015, 4 (82): : 14258 - 14262
  • [13] Intravitreal Bevacizumab for Diffuse Diabetic Macular Edema: Early Results
    Uslu, Ceylan
    Gulkilik, Gokhan Ibrahim
    Oba, Ersin
    Arslan, Banu
    [J]. TURK OFTALMOLOJI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2010, 40 (03): : 145 - 150
  • [14] Comparison of intravitreal bevacizumab with macular photocoagulation for treatment of diabetic macular edema: a systemic review and Meta-analysis
    Xiang-Dong Liu
    Xiao-Dong Zhou
    Zhi Wang
    Hong-Jie Shen
    [J]. International Journal of Ophthalmology, 2014, (06) : 1048 - 1055
  • [15] Outcomes of intravitreal bevacizumab and macular photocoagulation for treatment of diabetic macular edema in a tertiary care eye hospital at Karachi
    Jafri, Adil Salim
    Aziz-ur-Rehman
    Mirani, Abdul Haleem
    Memon, Saleh
    [J]. PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2017, 33 (05) : 1215 - 1219
  • [16] Effect of Intravitreal Bevacizumab with or without Macular Photocoagulation for Diabetic Macular Edema: A Meta-Analysis
    Kang Xiao
    Shi-Jia Weng
    Shen-Zhi Liang
    Jiong Wang
    Cheng Qian
    Guang-Ming Wan
    [J]. Diabetes Therapy, 2018, 9 : 2369 - 2381
  • [17] Comparison of intravitreal bevacizumab with macular photocoagulation for treatment of diabetic macular edema: a systemic review and Meta-analysis
    Liu, Xiang-Dong
    Zhou, Xiao-Dong
    Wang, Zhi
    Shen, Hong-Jie
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2014, 7 (06) : 1048 - 1055
  • [18] Effect of Intravitreal Bevacizumab with or without Macular Photocoagulation for Diabetic Macular Edema: A Meta-Analysis
    Xiao, Kang
    Weng, Shi-Jia
    Liang, Shen-Zhi
    Wang, Jiong
    Qian, Cheng
    Wan, Guang-Ming
    [J]. DIABETES THERAPY, 2018, 9 (06) : 2369 - 2381
  • [19] Comparison of Intravitreal Bevacizumab versus Triamcinolone for the Treatment of Diffuse Diabetic Macular Edema
    Kreutzer, Thomas C.
    Al Saeidi, Rashid
    Kook, Daniel
    Wolf, Armin
    Ulbig, Michael W.
    Neubauer, Aljoscha S.
    Haritoglou, Christos
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2010, 224 (04) : 258 - 264
  • [20] Intravitreal bevacizumab versus combined bevacizumab-triamcinolone versus macular laser photocoagulation in diabetic macular edema
    Faghihi, H.
    Roohipoor, R.
    Mohammad, S. -F
    Hojat-Jalali, K.
    Mirshahi, A.
    Lashay, A.
    Piri, N.
    Faghihi, Sh.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2008, 18 (06) : 941 - 948