Separation of the Effects of Land and Climate Model Errors on Simulated Contemporary Land Carbon Cycle Trends in the MPI Earth System Model version 1

被引:21
|
作者
Dalmonech, Daniela [1 ]
Zaehle, Soenke [1 ]
Schuermann, Gregor J. [1 ]
Brovkin, Victor [2 ]
Reick, Christian [2 ]
Schnur, Reiner [2 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Biogeochem, Biogeochem Integrat Dept, D-07745 Jena, Germany
[2] Max Planck Inst Meteorol, Land Earth Syst Dept, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany
关键词
TERRESTRIAL BIOSPHERE; USE TRANSITIONS; WOOD-HARVEST; CO2; UNCERTAINTY; SENSITIVITY; FEEDBACKS; CMIP5; WATER;
D O I
10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00593.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
The capacity of earth system models (ESMs) to make reliable projections of future atmospheric CO2 and climate is strongly dependent on the ability of the land surface model to adequately simulate the land carbon (C) cycle. Defining "adequate'' performance of the land model requires an understanding of the contributions of climate model and land model errors to the land C cycle. Here, a benchmarking framework is applied based on significant, observed characteristics of the land C cycle for the contemporary period, for which sufficient evaluation data are available, to test the ability of the JSBACH land surface component of the Max Planck Institute Earth System Model (MPI-ESM) to simulate land C trends. Particular attention is given to the role of potential effects caused by climate biases, and therefore investigation is made of the results of model configurations in which JSBACH is interactively "coupled'' to atmosphere and ocean components and of an "uncoupled'' configuration, where JSBACH is driven by reconstructed meteorology. The ability of JSBACH to simulate the observed phase of phenology and seasonal C fluxes is not strongly affected by climate biases. Contrarily, noticeable differences in the simulated gross primary productivity and land C stocks emerge between coupled and uncoupled configurations, leading to significant differences in the decadal terrestrial C balance and its sensitivity to climate. These differences are strongly controlled by climate biases of the MPI-ESM, in particular those affecting soil moisture. To effectively characterize model performance, the potential effects of climate biases on the land C dynamics need to be considered during the development and calibration of land surface models.
引用
收藏
页码:272 / 291
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] An improved land biosphere module for use in the DCESS Earth system model (version 1.1) with application to the last glacial termination
    Eichinger, Roland
    Shaffer, Gary
    Albarran, Nelson
    Rojas, Maisa
    Lambert, Fabrice
    GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 10 (09) : 3481 - 3498
  • [32] A global dataset on subgrid land surface climate (2015-2100) from the Community Earth System Model
    Zhang, Keer
    Lee, Xuhui
    Schultz, Natalie M.
    Zhao, Lei
    He, Chunyang
    Huang, Qingxu
    Liu, Zhifeng
    Chu, Haoran
    Zhao, Jiayu
    GEOSCIENCE DATA JOURNAL, 2023, 10 (02): : 208 - 219
  • [33] Beijing Climate Center Earth System Model version 1 (BCC-ESM1): model description and evaluation of aerosol simulations
    Wu, Tongwen
    Zhang, Fang
    Zhang, Jie
    Jie, Weihua
    Zhang, Yanwu
    Wu, Fanghua
    Li, Laurent
    Yan, Jinghui
    Liu, Xiaohong
    Lu, Xiao
    Tan, Haiyue
    Zhang, Lin
    Wang, Jun
    Hu, Aixue
    GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 13 (03) : 977 - 1005
  • [34] Bergen Earth system model (BCM-C): model description and regional climate-carbon cycle feedbacks assessment
    Tjiputra, J. F.
    Assmann, K.
    Bentsen, M.
    Bethke, I.
    Ottera, O. H.
    Sturm, C.
    Heinze, C.
    GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2010, 3 (01) : 123 - 141
  • [35] Influence of carbon-nitrogen cycle coupling on land model response to CO2 fertilization and climate variability
    Thornton, Peter E.
    Lamarque, Jean-Francois
    Rosenbloom, Nan A.
    Mahowald, Natalie M.
    GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES, 2007, 21 (04)
  • [36] The influence of two land-surface hydrology schemes on the terrestrial carbon cycle of Africa: A regional climate model study
    Anwar, Samy A.
    Diallo, Ismaila
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2021, 41 (S1) : E1202 - E1216
  • [37] The Effects of Dynamic Root Distribution on Land-Atmosphere Carbon and Water Fluxes in the Community Earth System Model (CESM1.2.0)
    Wang, Yuanyuan
    Jia, Binghao
    Xie, Zhenghui
    FORESTS, 2018, 9 (04):
  • [38] Contrasting Local versus Regional Effects of Land-Use-Change-Induced Heterogeneity on Historical Climate: Analysis with the GFDL Earth System Model
    Malyshev, Sergey
    Shevliakova, Elena
    Stouffer, Ronald J.
    Pacala, Stephen W.
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2015, 28 (13) : 5448 - 5469
  • [39] Climate response to physiological forcing of carbon dioxide simulated by the coupled Community Atmosphere Model (CAM3.1) and Community Land Model (CLM3.0)
    Cao, Long
    Bala, Govindasamy
    Caldeira, Ken
    Nemani, Ramakrishna
    Ban-Weiss, George
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2009, 36 : L10402
  • [40] Improving Simulation of the Terrestrial Carbon Cycle of China in Version 4.5 of the Community Land Model Using a Revised V-cmax Scheme
    Wang Yuan-Yuan
    Xie Zheng-Hui
    Jia Bing-Hao
    Yu Yan
    ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC SCIENCE LETTERS, 2015, 8 (02) : 88 - 94